Re: Is there ANYONE on the Pats that can cover?
posted at 10/14/2012 11:25 PM EDT
In response to Spetznaz24's comment:
In response to Bunker Spreckels' comment:
You guys are morons. Two questionable PI calls and 2 lucky completions deep with offensive holding not being called means we have no one who can cover.
Look around the league. Take the 2004 SB DVD out of your DVD players, kids.
Do you get angry when the coverage is good for 80% of the game? lmao
Those were the correct PI calls. What 2 "lucky" completions? Are you that blind that you refuse to even aknowledge that the secondary absolutely sucks? It is always excuses with this secondary. They make Joe Flacco look like Peyton Manning or Drew Brees in every game. Next week Sanchez will throw for 300 yards against this garbage secondary.
Russell Wilson threw for 300 yeards and 3 td's. What more can be said? The fact that the Seahawks came out throwing the ball lets everyone know what Pete Carrol thought of this secondary.
The only QB that this secondary can successfully play against is Tim Tebow.
Where is Belichick and his brilliant defense? Where are the exotic blitz packages. The Pats play a vanilla defense the whole game and the QB aren't scared to throw the ball. Watching the Packers tonight, it seems like even they have improved their secondary alot since last year.
It is really scary to think what would happen to the Pats if they actually were in a tougher division and played against the likes of the Packers, Falcons, or the Saints. While most of you were happy about not facing the tough schedule, I wished we had a schedule like last years Giants so we could learn more abou the team. Could this defense hold up aganst an elite offense? Not a chance. It is clear that this crappy secondary cannot even hold up against Joe Flacco or Russel Wilson, let alone Brees or Rodgers.