1. You have chosen to ignore posts from natesubs. Show natesubs's posts

    Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:44 PM EDT

    i really wanted this guy. he is a smart team captain and a very hard worker! and has a pretty good history rushing the passer
     

  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:46 PM EDT

    I had him converting to the "sam" linebacker for us, ironic with the Hightower signing, but this is another solid linebacker pick.

    Great shuttle, average to poor forty but big.
     

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:49 PM EDT

    Loading up
     

  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:51 PM EDT

    I could see that useless 2/4/5 defense working if Jones and Bequette are real gamers on the edge... interesting.
     

  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from natesubs. Show natesubs's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:51 PM EDT

    now if we can just get

    Kashif Moore, WR, U Conneticut
    Height: 5-9. Weight: 194.
    40 Time: 4.41.
    Vertical: 43.5.
    Projected Round (2012): 4-5.

    Coryell Judie, CB, Texas A&M

    Height: 6-0. Weight: 194.
    40 Time: 4.44. 10-Yd Split: 1.51.
    Vertical: 37. Broad: 10-6.
    Arm: 30 1/4.
    Projected Round (2012): 4-5.


    Ryan Miller, G, Colorado
    Height: 6-7. Weight: 321.
    40 Time: 5.27.
    Bench: 32.
    Arm: 33 1/8.
    Projected Round (2012): 6


    Louis Nzegwu, DE/OLB, Wisconsin
    Height: 6-4. Weight: 253.
    40 Time: 4.54.
    Bench: 22.
    Arm: 33 3/4.

    41.5” vertical jump!
    Projected Round (2012): 7-FA

     

  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from tcal2-. Show tcal2-'s posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:51 PM EDT

    and his name sounds kinda like Jacqueline Bisset



     

  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:51 PM EDT

    we might be switching to a 4-4...we sure have enough OLB/DE to do so, and we are still weak at safety...give the QB 2 seconds to throw and then have him on his back...who knows.  It might work.  Weakness becomes team strength.
     

  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from No-Mercy-Defence. Show No-Mercy-Defence's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:54 PM EDT

    Im hoping nzegwu is picked up by pats hes the One player i really want the pats to draft
     

  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:54 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    we might be switching to a 4-4...we sure have enough OLB/DE to do so, and we are still weak at safety...give the QB 2 seconds to throw and then have him on his back...who knows.  It might work.  Weakness becomes team strength.
    Posted by fl+adam,


    exactly!

    we coulda gone dt, cb, wr  o line.

    thomnpson, hilton (and others), hosely, etc

    why so many edge players?
     

  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:55 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    and his name sounds kinda like Jacqueline Bisset
    Posted by tcal2-


    Yowzer, I remember well her scuba diving in a white t-shirt scene from The Deep, that's pretty hot, who does that?
     

  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 10:56 PM EDT

    Bring Bequette up to 290 and Jones to 290 in 2 years and you have two very good ends, or leave one at 275 and the other bulks up to 290 and that's a DE LB combo to be scared of
     

  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:00 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    Bring Bequette up to 290 and Jones to 290 in 2 years and you have two very good ends, or leave one at 275 and the other bulks up to 290 and that's a DE LB combo to be scared of
    Posted by PatsEng


    At that size we're running a 4/3, more likely they stay lean and learn how to drop into coverage 10% of the time.  As long as they get to the QB I don't care how much they weigh or what position they play.

     

  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from CaptnFoxboro. Show CaptnFoxboro's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:01 PM EDT

    Jake Baquette ? ....

    THANK GOD !

     I thought Mayock said we selected Josh Beckett .

    After BB's Wilson pick ...you never know.
     

  14. This post has been removed.

     

  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from MoreRings. Show MoreRings's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:08 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    and i still had hopes for jermaine cunningham....
    Posted by ricky12684


    What do you think is going through his head right now?
     

  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from tcal2-. Show tcal2-'s posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:09 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes! : Yowzer, I remember well her scuba diving in a white t-shirt scene from The Deep, that's pretty hot, who does that?
    Posted by wozzy


    I was like 13 when the Deep came out and that scene was like pure erotica.  Still have that image burned in my gray matter
     

  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from leatherhelmet. Show leatherhelmet's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:09 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    and his name sounds kinda like Jacqueline Bisset
    Posted by tcal2-


     Y does this pic make me wanna smoke some Camels........
     

  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from tcal2-. Show tcal2-'s posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:11 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes! :  Y does this pic make me wanna smoke some Camels........
    Posted by leatherhelmet


    lol....exactly
     

  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:13 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    Bring Bequette up to 290 and Jones to 290 in 2 years and you have two very good ends, or leave one at 275 and the other bulks up to 290 and that's a DE LB combo to be scared of
    Posted by PatsEng



    let jones be the lean one and use that sleek frame!
     

  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:14 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes! : What do you think is going through his head right now?
    Posted by MoreRings



    i hope if im on teh team for the whole year.
    i wonder if another team is interested in me.
    call my agent... help me out here. im losin it!
     

  21. This post has been removed.

     

  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:22 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes! : At that size we're running a 4/3, more likely they stay lean and learn how to drop into coverage 10% of the time.  As long as they get to the QB I don't care how much they weigh or what position they play.
    Posted by wozzy

    Well 290 with power is a good size for a 5 tech. Bequette has the frame to add the extra 15lbs so I can see him bulking up and becoming a 5 tech that can also be a heavy 43 DE. Jones I think will remain in the 270 range as BB's elephant

     

  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from ZachRudy. Show ZachRudy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:24 PM EDT

    I remember reports from last year that claimed Cunningham was beefing up.  It will be interesting to see what he weighs coming into camp.
     

  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from elDunker2. Show elDunker2's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:27 PM EDT

    In response to "Re: Jake bequette! yes!":
    and his name sounds kinda like Jacqueline Bisset Posted by tcal2-
    I like the way your twisted brain works tcal2 That camel toe would stop anyone including Trent Richardson off left tackle
     

  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Jake bequette! yes!

    posted at 4/27/2012 11:33 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes!:
    In Response to Re: Jake bequette! yes! : Well 290 with power is a good size for a 5 tech. Bequette has the frame to add the extra 15lbs so I can see him bulking up and becoming a 5 tech that can also be a heavy 43 DE. Jones I think will remain in the 270 range as BB's elephant
    Posted by PatsEng
     

    I think Bequette will stay where he's at weight wise and play outside linebacker/rush end in the 2/4/5 and inside Sam possibly if my projections pan out. He had good shuttles and made a lot of tackles for an end, we'll see... either way we just got a lot deeper at linebacker.