Jets

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from HelmetofLeather. Show HelmetofLeather's posts

    Re: Jets

    In response to Section136's comment:

    In response to HelmetofLeather's comment:

     

    In response to Bustchise's comment:

     

     

     

    Pig latin?  What are you, twelve?

     

     



    So the new board DB has revealed himself.............

     

     

     




    Did so weeks ago - where ya been?

     



    Banned :-)

     Let me guess........He hides behind the anonymity of the internet to name call and act like the forum tough guy, constantly putting down other peoples opinions while rarely voicing an original thought...........I.E the TRUE definition of a troll.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from IrishMob7. Show IrishMob7's posts

    Re: Jets

    In response to Bustchise's comment:

    In response to IrishMob7's comment:

     

    In response to Bustchise's comment:

     

     

    In response to seawolfxs' comment:

     

     

     

    The jets are better than thought in pre season

    I knew there Dline was good and will be good - but they still didn't get pressure

    I think they are 2 LBS, 2 safeties and 1 cb aways from being really good

    They have fewer skill position players on Offense than anyone in the nfl

    Geno - has an arm , has very good mobility but the question is - how accurate is he?

    The jet OC called a horrible game-  just like ours


    Pat's Fan lost in Jet Land

     

     

     



    I disagree about the calling of the game.  They ran with success, they had receivers open when passing, it was a good mix of run/pass.  

     

     

     

     

     



    Yeah, the offensive playcalling was superb.  The nice "mix" led to a whopping 10 points against the "last ranked Patsie D."  It's so cute how you like to have it both ways. 

     

     

     

     



    If you're not Queenie, you are every bit the idiot.  The Jets offense, turnovers notwithstanding, clearly outplayed the patsies offense.  No team is going to win throwing three picks right to the DBs.  So yes, 32 runs and 35 passes was a nice mix.  Moron.

     




    What's the objective of an offense again? 

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share