Just Three More Years Of Brady

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from patthepatriot666. Show patthepatriot666's posts

    Just Three More Years Of Brady

    So Mallett and Brady are both going to be on 4 year contracts- It makes sense that if Mallett is an acceptable starter  (at least a top 15 type qb) and if brady still has significant trade value after three years- that brady is gone. If Mallett is pretty good how does belichick hold onto a 37 year old qb instead of going with the future.
    i think this is a fact: if belichick likes mallett 3 years from now he will be made the starter . doesnt this make sense?
    hoyer (maybe) and cassel were both made into successful qbs- doesnt it stand to reason that belichick will do more with the more talented arknsas qb that can throw 80 yards?
     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    In Response to Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady:
    Time to step away from the corn squeezins dood. That white lightning is rotting your brain. BB won't be here in 3 years and neither will Mallet.
    Posted by BabeParilli


    I guarantee you that Belichick will be coaching the Pats until he calls it quits. Who's better out there? Who would you rather have coaching the Patriots? Take your time picking any one of the other 3 time Superbowl winning coaches...-_-

    And even if BB is gone, no GM or HC is going to trade a young prospect and keep a 37 year old. 
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    So everyone says, you have to win now while you can.  Everyone is right, but its not that easy.  When Brady was managing games, the pats had a legendary defense.  When QB's have to "take over" games, imo, its not a good sign.  That's too much pressure to do it all, and they frequently fall short. 

       So  this includes manning to, cause you only use bradys name?I think this is a good post and well thought out

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    Once brady and manning are done the rivalry is dead .

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    In Response to Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady:
    Babe, Brady's demonstrating exactly what the board pans Manning for.  In the last 5 years Brady has been a phenomenal QB with 2 MVP's, but there are no rings during that time.  So everyone says, you have to win now while you can.  Everyone is right, but its not that easy.  When Brady was managing games, the pats had a legendary defense.  When QB's have to "take over" games, imo, its not a good sign.  That's too much pressure to do it all, and they frequently fall short.  The more I watch the more I am convinced that a team needs to be good on both sides of the ball, but the defense needs to be the better of the two.  Does this always work, no.  If it did, then I'd one might expect the Ravens to have another title or except when you recognize how strong Pittsburgh is.   Just my 2 cents.
    Posted by UD6


    I certainly do not think Brady is "SOLELY" responsible for the Pats not winning SBs since 2005. No different than saying Manning is responsible for the Colts only winning one SB. It IS a TEAM game!
     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    Wow see how good  debates go without rusty around lol
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    Babe has a realistic look at it,everyone is replaceable even if your the best at your job, but dont show results anything can happen.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from bubthegrub2. Show bubthegrub2's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    It makes no sense to fire BB just because he hasn't won a SB. This team has the highest winning percentage in the league. As for the deficiencies on defense, I agree to a point. But they were also only two plays away from having 5 rings instead of 3 (I'm assuming, of course, that they could have beat the Bears in SB41). When you lose guys like Bruschi, Harrison, McGinest, Seymoure, and Vrable you are going to have to do some rebuilding. But Kraft is no fool. There is no other coach who could do any better with this group of guys. And no available personnel guy who can do much better than BB has. As for this last draft being "loaded with talent", that's subjective. There were a lot of talented guys who never helped their team like Ryan Leaf, Jamarcus Russell, Vernon Gholston, and many more. But all that "talent" means squat! Maybe they'll win another Lombardi and maybe not. But if they were to replace BB I doubt they would be as strong a contender as they currently are. Most owners don't fire guys who win 11-14 games a year. Other than Marty I cannot recall a single one. I also see this defense being a top squad with a little more experience. As for passing on the "talent" in the draft, I expect they had reasons. I also doubt they would trade a 37 year old Brady to start Mallett. Unless he sustains a major injury or his skills completely erode I believe he will retire in NE. Sure, Joe Montana was traded at the end of his carreer, but Mallet is no Steve Young! Unless he turns out to be I expect Brady to play in Foxboro until he's ready to hang it up. Kraft wants to win, but he also wants to make money. And unless Brady starts playing live Favre did in his last years in GB the fans would not like him being traded, and that could hit Kraft in the wallet. We'll see, but I think any trade speculations for Brady or BB getting canned are way off base!

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ender587. Show Ender587's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    Your crazy babe.. Krafts not letting Tom or BB go any time soon.  I think your forgetting that last year was supposed to be a rebuilding year and we should have been a wild card for theplayoffs.  Instead we dominated the entire season, especially the end when it got tough.  Everything just catches up to us in the playoffs for some reason. 

    We need a better Defense, and we need it asap!  McCourty and Dowling should help that situation, but we desperatley need a quality Free Agent pass rush.  A difference maker. 

    You know how many teams win atleast 1 SB every 6 years???? I dont have a clue, but the group he has right now has done it multiple times.  Krafts sticking with whats already proven.
     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from sfpat. Show sfpat's posts

    Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady

    In Response to Re: Just Three More Years Of Brady:
    Babe has a realistic look at it,everyone is replaceable even if your the best at your job, but dont show results anything can happen.
    Posted by lippa


    Per Babe, everyone is replaceable except TB, who will play forever.  Tell me how many SB's (which seems to be Babe's only criteria) Brett Favre won in the last 10 years of his career?
     
Sections
Shortcuts