In Response to Re: Multiple reports, Receivers Running by and Getting Free of Mccourty Consistently at Camp
[QUOTE]ALL : I'm gonna hopefully try to make this my last post on here (hopefully; been posting here for many years, so losing that great hobby/now addiction, ain't gonna be easy). I can't prove this...but I WILL offer you the very same facts that I've worked with in order to draw this conclusion: BDC's own forum member Bredbru , I'm pretty certain (and in an utterly flabergasted and extremely disappointed way)- Is Greg Bedard . Last name's sorta close, huh? <And yea, I was initially just as at odds with this decree, as you ceratinly are- The "he can-NOT be this pretty dang decent NFL reporter, is the that subjective presumption of the 2 guys, which is the 7 ton unbelievable sole, yet MASSIVE column of stone, which is keeping me still at odds...despite all the evidence to the contrary, which I AM ceratin about; Crazy...); This monolith of self-wrought & self-determined unbelievability based on my preformed pretentions ("he is HIM?!?"), I AM unceratin about... I however, am not "unceratin" about the following: ~~ Greg Bedard during his start-up time penning Pats articles here, I had very much regarded as An extremely objective and true-to-facts, writer and reporter based on Pats happenings... -Excepting on 1 sorta bewildering player that Bedard slighted OVER and over and over...went to GREAT lengths to simply tee-off the guy...again & again, derisive comments on said player's skills simply randomly thrown in to those Op-Ed articles which were not based on any of that time's current surrounding play nor games (or lack thereof), and negative player-in-question-here slight- 1 after another, after another, after another, forwarded almost NEVER in, those specific instances of exact case-in-point plays which occured on the game field or the practice field... Those "He's just crvmmy..."-(i.e. minus, for an infinitely greater number of these slights, the very same exacting 'case in point' examples that he (and usually every decent reporter) forwards from specific plays in question...again, direct & exact cases in point based on specific plays in practices and/or games). Who was the NE player that Bedard never failed to specifically lambast using unspecific words on events, over and over and over last year? A: Devin McCourty. You may believe that I'm a liar right here, regarding what I'm about to say...the very same thing I stated was in print a few mornings back, In BOTH: ESPN's practice reports, Pats.com's Practice breakdowns, AND especially (because I use this sight 1000X more than the former 2)- Right here in Bedard's SEVERAL NE Practice breakdowns within the Extra Points section on BDC's NE frontpage. They are missing now... Q: "WHAT exactly is missing now, Laz?" ~What is missing is SEVERAL seperate positive quick 1 line blurbs from SEVERAL of The Pats Practices they've only had up until now, Regarding SEVERAL seperate EXACT plays within this MULTIPLE write-ups, having to do with specific cases regarding Devin McCourty making a good play in practice somewhere (including the quick info on the receiver, the play, DMC's good play during that matchup- As is the standard case offered on these Practice reports). I saw 'em... I READ them. I know I did. I can offer entire CONVERSATIONS in exacting measures that I've had with any person, even when it ocvcured months prior. I was a 3.0+ Double major @ UConn...and even split up 1 of these into a set of halves <English-Philosophy/Linguistics />. Lol, "pragmatism" aside, I'm a pretty smart m#th#-f##ka...I am- Still managed to pledge and hold rank in the top Frat at that time, and was President of the Undergraduate English Association during my time at university. I saw them, and I read them...HERE. Because it was only after "bredbru's" early morning yesterday <and oddly, VERY specific slam on McCourty based on completely NON and UN-specific plays of his during practice />, THAT only THEN did I venture onto those other sights during this span of time that NE's been practicing, in order to give credence to my claim yesterday that "bredbru" was being-Mmmm="less than even a barely considered Average amount of honesty in the claims he was forwarding... Oh, THEY still have the positives AND negatives (and far more positives on DMC in practice...DMC btw, who has been tasked with FAR more of the #2 WR coverage matches-Stallworth, Branch, Davis...as opposed to Lloyd; BB apparently sees it as a schematic advantage to give DMC the isolated 1-1, but on the #2 WR, while offering Dennard/Moore the #1 wideout (i.e. Lloyd) match-up WITH Safety help over the top... Read the reports on this, 'cause I've had it in attempting to forward any degree of honesty or accountablity on here...Done). 2 more observations: 1 /> Doesn't what Bredbru wrote months back, which almost verbatum was: "Dowling (he's not a good judge of talent, so we'll simply say- Dennard & then maybe Dowling)- should be looked at as currently NE's #1 CB, and that it was far more likely, that he'd take McCourty's starting spot, while DMC remains on the bench." -THAT sentiment was forwarded... I've heard nearly WORD for WORD from Bedard in his Extra Points column this very day. 2 /> Hey, maybe he called it GREAT, right? Question: How was bredbru able to "call right" stating the exact ambiguous take on DMC's completely non-specific play yesterday morning, PRIOR TO Bedard's column discusing the very same Completely non-specific slighting on McCourty's "practice play"...which became available and apparent to every member on here's viewing pleasure...Upon Greg Bedard's column finally coming up on this site @ 7:30 in the Evening? ~Whole bunch'a very oddly parralleling coincidences involved based on this lone subject alone here, huh? Ya know- The 1 in a million "call" from Bredbru to Bedard? Theee, ability to prognasticate the future words and future reporting in nearly EXACTLY the same words & grammar used? Theee, "Bredbru" over and over and over, outspoken words against McCourty no matter when, where, what, or ANY-thing that happened in the span of time surrounding these remarks, Ad the "Bedard" over and over and over again, slants to the same guy time and time again...in the same words...and offering the very same zero degree of events afforded by any one of his 1000 negative & VASTLY great overall amount of unspecified specific play in question, comments he'd throw out at any given time. Theee, sorta strange degree of total amnesia I apparently have...about reading Bedard's practice reports SPECIFICALLY eyeing Secondary play (Both my fav position, and under my understanding of Bredbru's witchhunt on this messageboard towards McCourty- beginning several days prior in the Ras I-McCourty thread <pretty decent memory, huh? />...Oh, also this "amnesia" of mine is based off of not 1 report...But several of these seperate practice reports, most of which I re-read in light of the newest practice analysis which came on. Weird, weird...REALLY, really, reaaaally weird series of similarities on this.
Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]
first, i want to say, redemption is possible
see bottom for my new message.
no way to message you directly so its gonna be here.
attempted to paste the post for reference, where you called me a liar for posting media reports you thought were made up by me, but i saw you erased it. maybe this is a sign that this can move toward reconciliation. lets see what (if) you have to say iin response to below
my reply is still there, reposting here for reference:
"wow laz i just wrote a lengthy response and reference about your questions and post, then i read your " you lie very regularly ".
i never saw or experienced such lack of respect from you.
so i erased my response. you wont get anything from me or response. i'll gladly respond to others who dont go out of the way to be so disrespectful.
fyi, i am not such a self loathing, self hating, miserable with my life, person to take even 1 second to go on some internet site and post lies "for whatever reason". i dont know what you are harboring feelings about, i dont think you are that unintelligent to believe what you said. if so, i was wrong. peace to you in your life, and goodbye."
and your reply to that started with
"try not to take it personally."
MY CURRENT RESPONSE
by the way, if i have an observation or opinion that is the same as, or similar to, anyone here or any sports writer, even if i express that observation first, it does not make me them.
my understanding of the definitionion of the word "lie", is words used to communicate something known by the communicator to be untrue or words used with an intent to deceive
2.)your responses partly seem to indicate a defense of certain players. while i do not dislike anyone who does no harm to others (not including with the rules of football), especially a member of our team, i can understand the feeling sometimes of wanting to "protect" a player's image. however when we take that to a point of attack, and or, false accusation, maybe we want to look at ourselves a little and ask what is going on.
3.) your reasoning in your original response uses a good many assumptions (about my motivations and such for posting reports, having opinions, etc)and comes to conclusion using faulty reasoning. a person can decide anything they want and tell themselves anything, in order to believe something is true.
4.) i had no anger toward you as a result of your post. i was quite surprised at what you wrote. that was my emotion.
5.) to continue a relationship (ie a communication) with someone who holds no respect for you, is to disrespect oneself. in order for someone to disrespect themselves, they have to feel bad about or inadequate about themselves. i do not have this problem. i am able to hold others in respect and hold myslef in respect (no implication made about anyone else).
6. if you slipped, made a mistake or feel you are in error (let me know):with the "liar" accusation (that i make up media reports that i post),
FORGIVENESS IS A POSSIBILITY.
i have not heard an apology to this point.
if an apology does not feel true, or is not forthcoming, i dont see continued communication, responses to your posts etc.
wishing you well.