In response to RidingWithTheKingII's comment:
In response to patsbandwagonsince76's comment:
What is the logic of giving Ozzie Newsome a B for never having egg on his face (in the past) when you are grading this year?
Green Bay gets an A- for not opening the checkbook yet..
They gave pleny of teams I - incomplete and mentioned the PAts were incomplete but could not resist dolling out the D+ whne it is clear there are pleny of moves to come.
Meanwhile: the Jets get a C for thrifty moves, a decimated defense, and what was left of the skill offense positons leaving and hope for keeping Revis.
A lot of guys who helped QB Mark Sanchez be effective in the past — Keller, RB Shonn Greene and RG Brandon Moore are gone — and a once-proud defense has been decimated. But an overhaul is needed, hence new GM John Idzik's thrifty moves. He better hope keeping all-pro CB Darrelle Revis around and letting him get healthy works out to both parties' advantage.
It's the anti-BB media bias. There is no other explanation for it. I'll keep posting stuff like this to prove it exists.
This is why any time the general consensus by the media in analyzing the Pats is likely utter garbage, which is also why it's comical we have adult fans here buying into it. That means you RKarp and Mt Hurl and all the other Debbie Downer types who apparently don't get it yet.
It's literally 90% anti-BB media and 10% accurate, fair and objective Pats media.
The average fan is reaading that on a flight from Providence to Pittsburgh will read it and believe it as being accurate.
NFLN ran a piece with Casserly (hates BB from his Skins days) and Darren Sharper (trying t protect Packer legacy and deflect from current awful Packers D) making awkwad arguments as to why the D isn't improved or why NE's window is closed. LOL
Meanwhile, this writer gives Denver an A for losing their entire starting LB group, not improving the Safety spot (or CB) at all and btoching the Dumveril deal, allowing teams to bid to drive price, holding up other moves they SHOULD be making?
Cannot be made up. People are morons in this world or have such an unhealthy agenda, it's so obvious that it supersedes basic logic.
In the end, I look at this analysis as FEAR that BB is nailing the FA period. Basically, it's Felger/Mazz analysis, so take the opposite angle to whatever they say and you're good.
RIght now, I'd give BB a B+/A-. If he gets Abraham and does some of the other things I mention above, it shoots right up to an A+.
Would dwarf his 2010 one by a mile.
the anti bb media oes exist...in your head
Their are tons of people who dislike Belichek. Some guy came on Dennis and Callahan and said Belichek would be a 500 coach without Brady. (Which is silly because he went 11-5 without him). Man I wish I could remember that guys name. I don't believe that there is some over arching anti-BB conspiracy, I just think some people don't like him.