Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from mississippipatfan. Show mississippipatfan's posts

    Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    Ravens have released both.  What you guys think?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from NoMorePensionLooting. Show NoMorePensionLooting's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    I'll kick the tires on anybody...why not...

    Huff can play at CB or Safety..

    I wanted the Pats to get Spears from Dallas....

    Likely both were available yesterday so no takers...

    They are done or Baltimore is going nowhere fast?

     

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    Yes, can I please have an order of Huff, with a side of Spears. If I dont like them I will just let them go and be right back where I started from.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    Neither.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:

    Neither. I warned RKrap Huff sucked which was why Oakland walked from him.  RKrap was on here saying BB blew it by not targeting Huff.

    LMAO

    I believe he also was saying BB blew it with Spears.  RKrap caught again.

     



    Troll much?

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bungalow-Bill. Show Bungalow-Bill's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:

    In response to Eldunker's comment:

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:

    Neither. I warned RKrap Huff sucked which was why Oakland walked from him.  RKrap was on here saying BB blew it by not targeting Huff.

    LMAO

    I believe he also was saying BB blew it with Spears.  RKrap caught again.

     



    Troll much?



    I am troll for being mocked when I was right again with my original premise, troll boy? Get back to the lame NBA boring Celts board.

     



    Its better than this one. You don't post there.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bungalow-Bill. Show Bungalow-Bill's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:

    Neither. I warned RKrap Huff sucked which was why Oakland walked from him.  RKrap was on here saying BB blew it by not targeting Huff.

    LMAO

    I believe he also was saying BB blew it with Spears.  RKrap caught again.

     



    Ya, every time a team walks from someone its because the player sucks. Except when BB does it because he's one step ahead of the curve. LMAO @ U.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from TripleOG. Show TripleOG's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

     

    Good news is, in spot duty as a rookie, Harmon looks comfortable. That's a good sign.

     

    Is It really though Rusty? Last years rookie Tavon Wilson looked even better getting 4 INTs and playing a much bigger role and he has been buried on the bench this year and hasnt even logged a special teams tackle in half a season!  LMAO!  Sounds promising!

    Now to be clear. I like Ryan and Harmon has looked ok but Im not gonna use that to say its a good sign. He could completely S*ck next year like  a lot of Dbs here in year 2. McCourty, Bodden, Ellis Hobbs, Meriweather,etc. Sorry , bad example

     

    and this gem...

     

    Chris Jones has outproduced Sheldon Richardson, for example..

     

    Lol,. Really! we know you hate the jets but cmon buddy. This is trolling by YOUR definiton.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    Twice as many sacks for Jones in about half the playing time. I'd say that's better.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from TripleOG. Show TripleOG's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

     

    Twice as many sacks for Jones in about half the playing time. I'd say that's better.

     




    How is he vs the run?

     

    Its nice when teams want to pass but d lineman need to stop the run. He gets pushed around in that regard and last I checked we were last in the league in run defense. Yea I'll take Richardson over C.J.?  Take off the glasses muz

     

    C.J. has been doubled a lot lately which has freed up C.Jones to make plays but you cant ignore him being pushed 5 yards back on running plays. A team will never look to pass if they run all day on you.

    I dont know stats of other teams,.I know we lost to the Jets and they were all over brady. I know The Jets have 3 Very Good D lineman and that someone else could be making plays based on Richardson getting attention. Who knows. So yes C.Jones may have been more productive in numbers but lots of variables in that. I know what player I would take. Lets ask the scouts

     

    Jets Are #1 vs the Run. Thats his value.

    Does C.Jones have the Pats at # 1 vs the pass??

    NOPE!  Case closed

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsLifer. Show PatsLifer's posts

    Re: Marcus Spears or Michael Huff interested or not

    In response to Harvey-Wallbanger's comment:

    Umm, 5 sacks in 5 games, Shizzles? Hmm? That's better than Richardson.

    26 tackles and more tackles for loss than Richardson.

    Case closed. Yes, he is outproducing Richardson and in fewer games. Shizzles exposed not doing his homework and listening to pro Jets ESPN hype instead. lmao

     

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/15955/chris-jones

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/15811/sheldon-richardson



    I posted on another thread jones vs Richardson. If we use stats alone, Russ is correct. Jones has more tackles and sacks than Richardson When you normalize the stats for games played. 

    I know dt's are asked to do different things/assignments so hard to say which one is better? Vw didn't get many sacks but I would love to have him right about now. 

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share