Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TexasPat. Show TexasPat's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    How many other NFL teams have not won the SB since 2007?  Were all of them involved in Spygate too?

    Seems he sounds like the Pats, unlike the rest of the NFL, are a lock to win the SB every year and when they don't, people like him blame Spygate forgetting the Pats overall W-L record since is better than before.



         It's all those idiot Patriot haters have.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    Faulk is a jerk but he pretty much speaks for fans outside of New England. Living in Seattle as a Pats fan and Spygate gets shoved in my face all the time. Would be nice to win one after spygate but it doesn't look promising with an aging Brady.



    It's true, but what does it say that those people don't have all the information?  Seattle fans are clearly jealous, which is why they ignore the people like Bill Cowher who said he did what BB did.

     



    You're riight but the average fan outside of NE will always use Spygate against NE fans. They don't care about true facts. If the Pats can win a SB outside of Spygate then there will be a response that we can throw in their faces. After watching Brady though I can't see it.




    don't worry about Brady worry about ur Swiss cheese defense

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bustify. Show Bustify's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to 42AND46's comment:

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    Faulk is a jerk but he pretty much speaks for fans outside of New England. Living in Seattle as a Pats fan and Spygate gets shoved in my face all the time. Would be nice to win one after spygate but it doesn't look promising with an aging Brady.



    It's true, but what does it say that those people don't have all the information?  Seattle fans are clearly jealous, which is why they ignore the people like Bill Cowher who said he did what BB did.

     



    You're riight but the average fan outside of NE will always use Spygate against NE fans. They don't care about true facts. If the Pats can win a SB outside of Spygate then there will be a response that we can throw in their faces. After watching Brady though I can't see it.




    don't worry about Brady worry about ur Swiss cheese defense



    Umm, NE's  D was arguably the best in the AFC through Week 5 or 6 prior to all of the injuries.

    Far from swiss cheese. They were lights out.  Talib was the DPOY until the injury in the Saints game and he still took out Jimmy Graham.

    Have you seen your team lately? Who do you think you are?  Your team has missed the playoffs TWO YEARS in a row due to cap hell, Tuck is gone, others will go as well.

    Your team is a sucky mess.  



    And yet the Giants have two SBs since the Pats have won one...

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bustify. Show Bustify's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to Bustify's comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to 42AND46's comment:

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to wasecl's comment:

    Faulk is a jerk but he pretty much speaks for fans outside of New England. Living in Seattle as a Pats fan and Spygate gets shoved in my face all the time. Would be nice to win one after spygate but it doesn't look promising with an aging Brady.



    It's true, but what does it say that those people don't have all the information?  Seattle fans are clearly jealous, which is why they ignore the people like Bill Cowher who said he did what BB did.

     



    You're riight but the average fan outside of NE will always use Spygate against NE fans. They don't care about true facts. If the Pats can win a SB outside of Spygate then there will be a response that we can throw in their faces. After watching Brady though I can't see it.




    don't worry about Brady worry about ur Swiss cheese defense



    Umm, NE's  D was arguably the best in the AFC through Week 5 or 6 prior to all of the injuries.

    Far from swiss cheese. They were lights out.  Talib was the DPOY until the injury in the Saints game and he still took out Jimmy Graham.

    Have you seen your team lately? Who do you think you are?  Your team has missed the playoffs TWO YEARS in a row due to cap hell, Tuck is gone, others will go as well.

    Your team is a sucky mess.  



    And yet the Giants have two SBs since the Pats have won one...



    That's great.  You were gifted those 2 SBs because to humans dropped the ball in each case. YOu should be writing thank you notes to Samuel and Welker.  

    BUt, moving forward, for years and years to come, the mediocre Eli's bloated contract and your cap hell, we will see the Giants middling in mediocrity.



    Your jealousy is delicious. Still upset that the Pats were outplayed and outcoached twice in the big game? 

    And given how the NFC East is, it wouldn't be surprising if the Giants were back in the playoffs next year.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    How many other NFL teams have not won the SB since 2007?  Were all of them involved in Spygate too?

    Seems he sounds like the Pats, unlike the rest of the NFL, are a lock to win the SB every year and when they don't, people like him blame Spygate forgetting the Pats overall W-L record since is better than before.



    See, that is the other irrational premise they use.  It just proves my point.  NE is held to a separate standard than all other 31 NFL teams, and it's because people are jealous they formed a dynasty and continue on being successful with chances at more rings.

    It's amazing to me how the people interviewing these morons don't bitchslap them more on this. They let people like Faulk, Warner, etc, off the hook every time.

    At best, NE would have needed to be missing the playoffs or going 500 or worse for that premise to even have a shot at making sense.



    This "event" occurred in the 1st week of the 2007 season... a season in which the Pats went 18 - 0 before losing in the SB.  If there was anything to this crap, how did they go 18 - 0 then?  As most of us noted, it is the jealousy of how succesful the Pats have been that continually sees this matter brought up as a reason the Pats haven't "won anything" since 2007. When you are that kid on the playground that is always losing to the "better" kid on the playground, you simply stomp up and down yelling: " Cheater, Cheater, Cheater!".

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bustify. Show Bustify's posts

    Re: Marshall Faulk - Patriots Haven't Won SB Since Spygate

    No, I just like trolling you because your Bustchise obsession is hilarious.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share