Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from yakv. Show yakv's posts

    Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    Micahel Bush is a guy under the radar
    Much better runner than BJGE ,
    we could get him cheaper ,
    i dont think the raiders will sign him.
    BJGE could go to the chiefs no problem 
    but at 3-4M rather sign BUSH , not as a full time starter 
    but 15-20 carries with ridley , vereen ,
    and woodhead in hurry up .
     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from yakv. Show yakv's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    Also Very fast out of the backfield receiving  
    much better hand than BJGE ,  
    i like BJGE but he aint that good with the screens 
    bush is much better
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bspikes55. Show Bspikes55's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    I would not mind this at all hes a good power back
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TSWFAN. Show TSWFAN's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    Does he fumble?
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from yakv. Show yakv's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    one fumble  last year 
    four the entire career 

    STATS 
    ATT YDS AVG LNG TD FD REC YDS AVG LNG TD FUM LST 
    256 977 3.8 44 7 53 37 418 11.3 55 1 1 1 
    632 2,642 4.2 67 21 122 91 879 9.7 55 1 4 4
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Brawny27. Show Brawny27's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    In response to "Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!": [QUOTE]Micahel Bush is a guy under the radar Much better runner than BJGE , we could get him cheaper , i dont think the raiders will sign him. BJGE could go to the chiefs no problem  but at 3-4M rather sign BUSH , not as a full time starter  but 15-20 carries with ridley , vereen , and woodhead in hurry up . Posted by yakv[/QUOTE] How good is he? Does he fumble because Benny never did!
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from yakv. Show yakv's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    No Fumble - 1 yard gain 
    1 fumble all year - big plays breaking tackles and better backfield reciever 

    so arian foster fumbles is BJGE> FOSTER 
     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from anonymis. Show anonymis's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    Patriots also have a need to improve run blocking too. Last year, #9 in rushing, this year at #20.

    So, either they need to improve on the OL technique and personnel or get extra help either at TE of a FB type blocker.
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from TexasPat. Show TexasPat's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    In Response to Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!:
    [QUOTE]Micahel Bush is a guy under the radar Much better runner than BJGE , we could get him cheaper , i dont think the raiders will sign him. BJGE could go to the chiefs no problem  but at 3-4M rather sign BUSH , not as a full time starter  but 15-20 carries with ridley , vereen , and woodhead in hurry up .
    Posted by yakv[/QUOTE]

         Bush is not "under the radar", nor will he come "cheaper" than BJGE.
    But, he is better. Here are his stats: http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/10544/michael-bush.

         Here are Bennie's stats: http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/11754/benjarvus-green-ellis 
     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from sporter81. Show sporter81's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    In Response to Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!! : Umm, if I suggested Bush to come here last year, before his off field legal issues, then why wouldn't I know what Bush's skill set is? Bush is a "fantasy monster"? Oh great, another teenage kid Pats fan who is clueless using fantasy leagues as jusitification as to why Bush would fit here. lol Bush backs up McFadden, so Bush is more of a back up than what BJGE is.   Also, Oakland runs the most dumbed down system possible, while NE does not. Bush would need to be cheap for it to make sense, which he likely would not. I love being lectured by 17 year old kids named "Ricky" on a messageboard. lmao
    Posted by RustyGriswold[/QUOTE]

    I'm with you on trading for MJD. He can do it all, and is a great team guy as well, durable, right build for a back, and only 26. Just his presence back there would open up the offense against anyone. He's definitely worth trading the 31st pick for.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from sporter81. Show sporter81's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    Right, they could give up one of the 2nds, hopefully theirs and not Oaklands. Woodhead ok too as they would be set at back and have to get a real kickoff return man. With their cap space they could address some of their other needs and be in great shape for next year, dominating. BB has done great GM work in rebuilding this team and setting up for next season.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Paul_K. Show Paul_K's posts

    Re: Michael Bush Cheaper And Better Than BJGE!!

    BJGE comes cheaper because he's a restricted free agent.  If the Patriots slap the high offer on him, no other team will part with a first rounder and a third rounder too, on top of a lot of cash for bidding him way up.

    Going the other way, Michael Bush might well cost the Patriots a first rounder and a third rounder too, plus the bucks.  Better to draft a fresh guy.
     
  25. This post has been removed.

     

Share