Re: National Media Back on Pat's Jocks
posted at 11/3/2010 5:27 PM EDT
In Response to Re: National Media Back on Pat's Jocks
[QUOTE]Oh and Rusty - apparently you can't prove that the Jets were caught in 06 because you decided to delete that post. Why do that? Oh and why not answer me as to why Belichick was taping on the sidelines? And why didn't belichick heed the memo? If belichick didn't understand the memo, why didn't he ask for clarification from the league?
Posted by Indylove[/QUOTE]
Delete what post?
NY was asked to shut down. FACT
I could post fact after fact after fact here and it won't matter with you. You are flat out retarded.
Here is it is:http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3151217
EVen if you read thisk, this proves that the location and why it's specified, is there to protect against the tape being pulled out or it digitially being viewed in the game that day.
The tape was not taken out.
The Jets tape, used from the sidelines, in an inappropriate spot. Hence, why they were shut down, not because NE decided against it. That's false. NE can't control the road team's filming, unless it is deemded inappropriate by the NFL.
The bottom line as to why NY was involved in Spygate is, NE started heckling Manboobs in January 2006, playing to the fact NE was at home and asked NFL to shut them down.
Technically, the NFL can't do that UNLESS they are in an incorrect spot.
This is a fact, because the rule states the home team must provide a spot, so it's considered fair. Otherwise, the NFL wouldn't have shut Manboobs's camera down. Team personnel cannot execute that request, the NFL officials on gameday handle that, just like they handle the communications.
So,when Sept 2007 rolled around and NE never bothered to ask, Manboobs and Tannenbaum saw it as their chance to attack and smear, knowing Goodell would have to act, especially if the Jets used the media.
Read up, kid. You are barking up trees, you'll never climb.