i hope bb used that as motivation for tb and the team. thats how biases work. u start with guys you know hate the pats or are already predisposed that way and then act like you are doing an objective survey on who's the better qb ever. first they picked parcells. sorry, no way no how is he picking against belichick and tb. he's only said that like 300 times on a national basis. y would he change now on brady? then they mention that their other expert JOE "please stop running the score on me"Gibbs picked peyton, no shocker there.
TO GIBBY, ANYONE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THe decadent belicheck is better. lastly, they ask Don "we was robbed by John Smith" Shula. yep, next time they should include "neutral" charlie weis and tony dungy or ask "neutral" GMs like Scott Paoli or Dimitroff or Billy Polian. guess if Scott thought the Pats got a raw deal in carolina? to me, you ask a guy like Herm Edwards, Dick Vermeil (perhaps he's still smarting from 2001), or anyone without legit koolaid love for us/tb or peyton/colts..
if they were predisposed to brady or pats, they would have picked 2 guys with legendary leanings to us. instead they slanted it blatantly towards peyton. none of the 3 were remotely OBJECTIVE! That survey just reinforced management and their panelists' biases.. period! should get updates TODAY for the record!