In response to kansaspatriot's comment:
Trade him , and bring Cassell back.
The talk is that KC is working to trade Cassel to Ariz.
Re: Need to trade Mallett
posted at 2/28/2013 11:01 AM EST
In response to kansaspatriot's comment:
Trade him , and bring Cassell back.
This post has been removed.
Re: Need to trade Mallett
posted at 2/28/2013 11:17 AM EST
In response to PatsEng's comment:
I agree, if we can get a top 50 pick trade him now. If it's not a top 50 I might keep him just because it would costs us that much just to replace him
Mallett does not have either of those things yet.
Re: Need to trade Mallett
posted at 2/28/2013 12:00 PM EST
In response to nomadfan's comment:
In response to kansaspatriot's comment:
Trade him , and bring Cassell back.
The talk is that KC is working to trade Cassel to Ariz.
Re: Need to trade Mallett
posted at 2/28/2013 10:08 PM EST
In response to leatherhelmet's comment:
In response to Godvernment's comment:
In response to leatherhelmet's comment:
In response to Godvernment's comment:
just because he is signed til age 40 doesn't mean he will be playing for NE til age 40. if BB see's a rising star in mallett he will have no problems shipping brady if his play declines in the next couple seasons.
Brady didn't take a low salary to be traded
brady doesn't own or run the new england patriots. he's a player.
Together Kraft/BB/ Brady turned us from Patsies to perennial champs.....Brady DID NOT sign this contract thinking BB or Kraft would screw him. I guess the word Loyalty wasn't floated in your household...
Lasting or existing for a long or apparently infinite time; enduring.
We are by no means perenial champs. Contenders yes....champs no