In response to BurtonMercer's comment:
1. I don't think understanding the English language and word differences means I made "an assumption".
2. That's correct. I felt that was the official and complete NFL rule, as did Sheldong. I am not on trial here. I told him I appreciated the second source because it clarified it. All I was saying was what he sourced didn't' clarify it based on how it was worded. It's true. It didn't. My job isn't to research the official NFl rules which is why I asked YESTERDAY if anyone knew.
Your belligerence on this board since you had your Welker induced meltdown has been atrocious, PatsEng.
You also thought I was Phat Rex yesterday with the Phat Rex version of Bunker Spreckels. I get your embarrassed about that a bit and now are following me around, but just drop it. I have made myself ABUNDANTLY clear above.
You stated something as fact when you admit it was confusing and needed clarity is the very definition of assumption:
"the act of taking for granted or supposing"
You took for granted that your definition of the statement was true without varifying your claim. That's assumption.
Additionally I don't know what other thread you asked but you did not ask on this thread for clarification and this is the thread you made the statement in so I responded to that statement in this thread. If you wished to point to another thread in which you made that statement provide a link.
since Welker I have not been banned once for attacking posters, how about you? So maybe I'm not the one being belligerent here
You are right I mistook the fact Bunkers with the real one. I should have known the real one got banned while the fact one still exists. How embarrassing for me that I didn't realize the real one getting banned