No Ground Game

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    DaPrince - thanks for clarifying.  I absolutely agree with your now-clear-to-me position. 

    Just because Maroney was more a bust than a find doesn't mean they shouldn't look for a quality RB on the first day of the draft.  Not necessarily, 1st round.  Or have they changed the draft so that only the first round is done on the first day?  Obviously not clear on this.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from isurfvb35. Show isurfvb35's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    ahh lets end this argument here really quick, when the pats won there 3 sbs who were the running backs? clock killin corey dillon,antoine smith, jr redmond,faulk,patrick pass.....antoine smith and corey dillon were big bruising backs who ran downhill, faulk one of the best 3rd down backs in the business, my point is these guys were pretty dammned solid backs, cant say the same for the group now, so yeah i would say we have a weak/no running game and need to get back to pounding the ball, controlling the clock, and taking some pressure off of brady because play action makes him almost unstoppable, and we cant run any type of play action now with the backs we have.
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from isurfvb35. Show isurfvb35's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    In Response to Re: No Ground Game:
    In Response to Re: No Ground Game : when the Pats won 3 SB's they had a defense that allowed the offense to play ball control. they do not have that luxury this year
    Posted by rkarp


    absolutly had the best defensive units in pats history, and your argument is invaild with the point im making, but im sure you know that bjge,woodhead and morris would get the same results as dillon,smith or faulk did on that team, yeah they had a great defense and a great running game, this pats team has neither bro!!!
     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    I think some posters here are confused, not having a ground game is substantially different than choosing not to run. 

    It implies we don't have the personel to do certain things, anyone who thinks we have less talent than we did in 2001 is daft.  We are more talented now than ever before, certainly as close offensively as 2007; the bench mark that gets the fantasy geeks drooling.

    Bad play calling, unbalanced offense... that's it, that's all. 

    Weis gave guys like Jermaine Wiggins and Patrick Pass careers, O'Brien can't get it done with Moss, Welker et al... 
     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from james32. Show james32's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    Patriots problem is they will not run.Give the ball to Woodhead 20 times and he will get you 100 yards.And keep the defense off the field. mark ingram = over rated
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    Ask Peyton Manning where his ground game is. The Colts can run the ball if they please, but they choose to pass as much as they can. 


    Our offense suks! No true elite QB needs a running game to be productive, not even in our pass first era. Drew can win without a running game, Peyton can and Rodgers can, why can't Tom? 

    It's because he has scrubs at his WR positions. Who was our RB in 2007? Laurence eff'ing Maroney. Wes is not a good WR without a deep threat to pull coverage, Deion Branch was never a really good WR when he was here. He was a guy you could count on to be open at the right spot and time(a Jabar Gaffney if you will), but never a true number 1 receiver. Tate is basically a rookie and Edelman is only a slot receiver.  

    Most of the WRs on the Pats offense became useless once they traded Moss away. They all get single covered and the other defense plugs the box. Even if Welker beats his coverage the LBs and Safeties are usually waiting for him. 

    Before we get a RB I suggest we get a deep threat WR. BJE and Woodhead are fine. 
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    In Response to Re: No Ground Game:
    Ask Peyton Manning where his ground game is. The Colts can run the ball if they please, but they choose to pass as much as they can.  Our offense suks! No true elite QB needs a running game to be productive, not even in our pass first era. Drew can win without a running game, Peyton can and Rodgers can, why can't Tom?  It's because he has scrubs at his WR positions. Who was our RB in 2007? Laurence eff'ing Maroney. Wes is not a good WR without a deep threat to pull coverage, Deion Branch was never a really good WR when he was here. He was a guy you could count on to be open at the right spot and time(a Jabar Gaffney if you will), but never a true number 1 receiver. Tate is basically a rookie and Edelman is only a slot receiver.   Most of the WRs on the Pats offense became useless once they traded Moss away. They all get single covered and the other defense plugs the box. Even if Welker beats his coverage the LBs and Safeties are usually waiting for him.  Before we get a RB I suggest we get a deep threat WR. BJE and Woodhead are fine. 
    Posted by 49Patriots


    Wow dude.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    In Response to Re: No Ground Game:
    In Response to Re: No Ground Game : Wow dude.
    Posted by TrueChamp


    I hate our offense! I've been vocal about it for a while, THEY SUK!!!
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Tcal2. Show Tcal2's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    In Response to Re: No Ground Game:
    Patriots problem is they will not run.Give the ball to Woodhead 20 times and he will get you 100 yards.And keep the defense off the field. mark ingram = over rated
    Posted by james32


    Don't get me wrong here, I love me some Head but if you give the guy 20 carries he will end up looking like Beef Stew.  He's a very good change of pace back but remember he has the body frame of an 8th grade girl.
     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from newenglanderinexile. Show newenglanderinexile's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    In Response to Re: No Ground Game:
    Ask Peyton Manning where his ground game is. The Colts can run the ball if they please, but they choose to pass as much as they can.  Our offense suks! No true elite QB needs a running game to be productive, not even in our pass first era. Drew can win without a running game, Peyton can and Rodgers can, why can't Tom?  It's because he has scrubs at his WR positions.
    Posted by 49Patriots


    I guess this is why of all the teams you name, New England has the best winning percentage.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from zbellino. Show zbellino's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    The Pats have a ground game, it just isn't dominant. They aren't a team that can line up against a good run defense and simply rush it down their throats.

    The Pats don't do anything dominantly this season. They just do good enough most of the time, and focus on exploiting matchups as so many other teams are less complete than they. 
     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from zbellino. Show zbellino's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    Umm. I would say that the Steelers have a dominant run defense. They only allow sixty ypg. conversely the Chiefs have been pretty dominant on the ground, rushing for nearly 180 ypg. 

    NE doesn't have that "one phase" that is dominant, although when Chung is healthy I think you could say they have dominant special teams. 

    But they do everything ok, which means (what I mean) that a team that cannot "impose its will" in any one aspect like NE, relies on good coaching, and choosing where the other team might have a chink in its armor. 

    A Jack of All Trades can defeat a King of one suit if he can leverage the King's weaknesses and minimize the impact of his advantages.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: No Ground Game

    I agree with the original post...the ground game is week. When you have the threat of Brady, a runner in this offense shouldn't be seeing eight men in the box and have some room to run. I think Law Firm is a good back up, but nothing more because he can't break it outside and has to many games with pedestrian numbers. Woodhead was a huge pick up, but he has to be the smallest back I've ever seen and I think if you give him the rock too much he'll be less effective, get hurt or fumble. Taylor is an injury waiting to happen and is old (same for Morris except not as good).
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share