not Pats related, but SB related?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from rkarp. Show rkarp's posts

    not Pats related, but SB related?

    Seahawks lose Browner for the year and Thurmond for 4 games...does this cost them home field in the playoffs and cost them a SB berth?

    7 guys suspended for PED's since 2011....PeteC, what the heck is going on up there?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    A coach from California..  'nuff said.  Hey man, want a tote?  LOL

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    A coach from California..  'nuff said.  Hey man, want a tote?  LOL




    I dub thee... PED Petey

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    It certainly won't help them. If they lose homefield then there is will most def mak it harder to get to the SB. Look at NO and Carolina, massive homefield advantages there

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Iceman4. Show Iceman4's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?


    how about drug testing Sherman

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?


    It certainly doesn't help, and with their remaining schedule being saints, at niners, at gints, arizona, and a fighting st louis rams team, I would say it's realistic they lose 2 more games. 

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from capecodwilly. Show capecodwilly's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    A coach from California..  'nuff said.  Hey man, want a tote?  LOL




    Not sure why he would want a tote? Well ... excuse me while I go take a toke.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from rkarp. Show rkarp's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    In response to melswitt's comment:

    In response to Iceman4's comment:


    how about drug testing Sherman




    Wasn't he already nabbed for PED's once before?  I think he was, either for PED's or drugs/alcohol...



    I believe he was the 8th guy nabbed for PED's but he beat the accusation and had the stuation over turned

    it seems to me that most feel the SB will go thru Seatle and the Hawks can't be beat at home, but these suspensions may cost them home field

    I could see the Saints beating the Hawks in New Orleans

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from NYPatsFan12. Show NYPatsFan12's posts

    Re: not Pats related, but SB related?

    weed

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share