The last 6 of 7 teams to win the Super Bowl all had good to very good WRs...except for Pittsburg..Its well documented over and over that the NFL has become a passing league...So we are fortunate enough to have one of the greatest QBs to play the game and a very mediocre WR corp..makes no sense! Bradys window is very small...get him some playmaking WRs and give us a chance to win another trophy..before its too late and Brady is either traded or leaves ...Go Pats in 2013!

The last 6 of 7 teams to win the Super Bowl all had good to very good WRs...except for Pittsburg..Its well documented over and over that the NFL has become a passing league...So we are fortunate enough to have one of the greatest QBs to play the game and a very mediocre WR corp..makes no sense! Bradys window is very small...get him some playmaking WRs and give us a chance to win another trophy..before its too late and Brady is either traded or leaves ...Go Pats in 2013!

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

More backpedaling?  Let me understand what you are now saying - because earlier you said that Brady's picks led to short field scores.  So, because the patsies were down 14-13 starting the 4th quarter, yet gave up a TD immediately starting the 4th qtr, Ridley fumbles on the next drive and that turns into TD pretty quickly for Baltimore, changing the score to 28-13, it was Brady's pick at the 7 minute mark that "changed momentum"?

Somehow, it still shocks me just how dumb one person can be.

Our WR are all the same type WR's possesion guys...we need WR that can seperate ...M Wallace would be nice...i would let Welker go for a guy like Wallace...teams flood the zone n our offense goes limp...i had hoped Lloyd would have been the answer but he wasnt...just another possesion type WR

the offense has really let them down over the past several post seasons.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

Hey, remmember when BB use to make half time adjustments?  That was awesome.  Why did he stop doing that?

He does and still does as a defensive coach. If it takes firing McDaniels or pulling Brady from having carte blanche with audibles, I am all for it.

Why adjust what is working well? You're a moron. 

NE shut fown Baltimore's offense in the 1st half. It was until 2 turnovers did Baltimore get going in the 4th qtr.

I get you like Brady sucking in the postseason, but real Pats fans have had enough watching it.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

Hey, remmember when BB use to make half time adjustments?  That was awesome.  Why did he stop doing that?

He does and still does as a defensive coach. If it takes firing McDaniels or pulling Brady from having carte blanche with audibles, I am all for it.

Why adjust what is working well? You're a moron. 

NE shut fown Baltimore's offense in the 1st half. It was until 2 turnovers did Baltimore get going in the 4th qtr.

I get you like Brady sucking in the postseason, but real Pats fans have had enough watching it.

You too are claiming that it was two turnovers that put Baltimore ahead? Do any of you patsie fans watch the games?

Have you ever read a book? Where did anyone, including me, say "2 NE turnovers put Batlimore ahead"?

2 turnovers, gave Balt two more drives a lot faster than they would have earned otherwise, MORON.

All of a sudden in close game in the 4th, a turnover is a good thing?

LMAO

Yes, the Ridley fumble or Brady INT each helped Baltimore in the second half.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

Oh, I thought the Jets "created" those turnovers. 

I know you don't actually watch the games. I can tell from the really dumb things you post.  For example, only one of those scores in the Jets/ patsies game came from a turnover.  It was the botched awful fake punt call by BB.  That was hilarious.  Regardless, here you are again, absolving that patsie D from taking the ball away from turnover prone Mark Sanchez and blaming Brady for not putting up 30 points on a good D.

BB botched the fake punt or a player did?  He faked the punt because Brady was garbage and he was trying to get something, anything, going. Pretty clear.  NE's offense was putrid, unwilling to adjust or change via Brady's on field management. 

Again, the one gift you'll ever see from the Pats. Enjoy that SB win even if the NFL knows it wasn't the actual SB. lol

We've been enjoying annual bludgeonings with the Jetsies the last 2 years with more to come. LMAO

Rex Ryan and Sanchez together again in 2013. Cannot be made up.

LOL

Clearly it was a horrible panic call.  Only down 7-3 in the first half against turnover prone Mark Sanchez, a fake punt with a safety with bad hands on his own 40 with A MINUTE TO GO IN THE HALF against one of the best special teams in the NFL in 2010?  Oh, yeah, great call! Is anything ever BB's fault?  A heavy dose of passing calls?  Not BB, but Brady.  Leaving a fumble prone back like Ridley in the game to fumble? Not BB, Ridley.  Drafting a CB in the first round who was so bad in man D that he had to be moved to safety? Not BB, McCourty's fault. 

You can't make this stuff up.

I am pretty sure any RB who took a whack like Ridley did would also have let the ball go.

A long way from Shonn "FUmbles" Greene who put the ball on the ground if breathed on.

Hey, do you think they'll resign that bust, or do you think they'll pretend Bilal Powell (another draft disappointment) along with, superstar all purpose back Joey McKnight, can handle the load for Marky Mark and Co in 2013?

LMAO

PS Ronnie Lott was moved from CB to Safety after a great rookie year in 1981. Bill Walsh thought he'd be better there.  Yeah, Bill Walsh sucked. The 49ers should have hired the Rex RYan of the era, Jerry Glanville instead.

You just can't win, can you?  lol All of a sudden where you play on defense means you aren't a good player.

Cannot be made up. Can't be.

Hey, do you think the new GM trades Revis or Cromartie? Good thing you drafted one overrated money grabbing primadonna, signed another for no reason and then drafted a nickelback BUST in dwarf, Kylie Wilson. Superb planning!

LMAO

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

Oh, I thought the Jets "created" those turnovers. 

I know you don't actually watch the games. I can tell from the really dumb things you post.  For example, only one of those scores in the Jets/ patsies game came from a turnover.  It was the botched awful fake punt call by BB.  That was hilarious.  Regardless, here you are again, absolving that patsie D from taking the ball away from turnover prone Mark Sanchez and blaming Brady for not putting up 30 points on a good D.

BB botched the fake punt or a player did?  He faked the punt because Brady was garbage and he was trying to get something, anything, going. Pretty clear.  NE's offense was putrid, unwilling to adjust or change via Brady's on field management. 

Again, the one gift you'll ever see from the Pats. Enjoy that SB win even if the NFL knows it wasn't the actual SB. lol

We've been enjoying annual bludgeonings with the Jetsies the last 2 years with more to come. LMAO

Rex Ryan and Sanchez together again in 2013. Cannot be made up.

LOL

Clearly it was a horrible panic call.  Only down 7-3 in the first half against turnover prone Mark Sanchez, a fake punt with a safety with bad hands on his own 40 with A MINUTE TO GO IN THE HALF against one of the best special teams in the NFL in 2010?  Oh, yeah, great call! Is anything ever BB's fault?  A heavy dose of passing calls?  Not BB, but Brady.  Leaving a fumble prone back like Ridley in the game to fumble? Not BB, Ridley.  Drafting a CB in the first round who was so bad in man D that he had to be moved to safety? Not BB, McCourty's fault. 

You can't make this stuff up.

I am pretty sure any RB who took a whack like Ridley did would also have let the ball go.

A long way from Shonn "FUmbles" Greene who put the ball on the ground if breathed on.

Hey, do you think they'll resing that bust, or do you think they'll pretend Bilal Powell (another draft disappointment) along superstar all purpose back Joey McKnight can handle the load for Marky Mark and Co in 2013?

LMAO

Ah yes, when made to look like the fool you are deflect and defelct some more. I'm not sure about resinging, mostly becasue I don't know what it means.  Who are you calling a bust? 

Yes, Powell has been another 4th round draft disapointment. What does that mean for 2nd round pick Vereen who had half as many yards?  All out bust?

Looks like Rusty just got bludgeoned again.  Will he delete another account?

What does "defelct" mean?

Vereen looks good to me as he does to all Pats fans or teams that look to use more than RB in their offense.  At least Vereen will back in the playoffs next year why McKnight (if they keep that bust) and Powell won't again.

But, you enjoy!

Now is a good time for you to log out as Phatty Virgin and log in as "Frank158", don't ya think? That way, you can try to make it appear, you have a Pats fan as an ally with you here.

It's such a swell troll tactic by you and it has everybody fooled!  Yay!

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Umm, down 14-13 to start the 4th. with our offense not having much of anything since the 2nd qtr, is not on the defense.   The D couldn't save the offense again, yes. 

That's called waiting for the offense to do something more than 13 points. The fact they didn't do anything before halftime other than botch the 2 minute goal line offense, settling for a FG, and then doing NOTHING in the second half, means NE deserved to lose, 21 points allowed in the second half or not. It's a moot point. If they actually scored more than 13 points or had threatened too, earlier, then you's have a leg to stand on.

The Pats offense simply couldn't get the ball past mid field for MOST of the game.

It's no different than you thinking your poory built Potemkin Village Jets in 2010 did something spectacular on offense. NE's offense put 11 points on your D through 3 qtrs, a month after scoring 45. They didn't. You were handed the situation on a silver platter. Good job in them taking it.

Handing your team short fields, or Balt short fields, with them feeling they have nothing to lose, is a bad recipe for the home team.

Our offense SUCKS in the postseason. Sucks.  Worse than yours. At least you made a commitment to run it to minimize the touches for that bust Sanchez.

Oh, I thought the Jets "created" those turnovers. 

I know you don't actually watch the games. I can tell from the really dumb things you post.  For example, only one of those scores in the Jets/ patsies game came from a turnover.  It was the botched awful fake punt call by BB.  That was hilarious.  Regardless, here you are again, absolving that patsie D from taking the ball away from turnover prone Mark Sanchez and blaming Brady for not putting up 30 points on a good D.

BB botched the fake punt or a player did?  He faked the punt because Brady was garbage and he was trying to get something, anything, going. Pretty clear.  NE's offense was putrid, unwilling to adjust or change via Brady's on field management. 

Again, the one gift you'll ever see from the Pats. Enjoy that SB win even if the NFL knows it wasn't the actual SB. lol

We've been enjoying annual bludgeonings with the Jetsies the last 2 years with more to come. LMAO

Rex Ryan and Sanchez together again in 2013. Cannot be made up.

LOL

Clearly it was a horrible panic call.  Only down 7-3 in the first half against turnover prone Mark Sanchez, a fake punt with a safety with bad hands on his own 40 with A MINUTE TO GO IN THE HALF against one of the best special teams in the NFL in 2010?  Oh, yeah, great call! Is anything ever BB's fault?  A heavy dose of passing calls?  Not BB, but Brady.  Leaving a fumble prone back like Ridley in the game to fumble? Not BB, Ridley.  Drafting a CB in the first round who was so bad in man D that he had to be moved to safety? Not BB, McCourty's fault. 

You can't make this stuff up.

I am pretty sure any RB who took a whack like Ridley did would also have let the ball go.

A long way from Shonn "FUmbles" Greene who put the ball on the ground if breathed on.

Hey, do you think they'll resign that bust, or do you think they'll pretend Bilal Powell (another draft disappointment) along with, superstar all purpose back Joey McKnight, can handle the load for Marky Mark and Co in 2013?

LMAO

PS Ronnie Lott was moved from CB to Safety after a great rookie year in 1981. Bill Walsh thought he'd be better there.  Yeah, Bill Walsh sucked. The 49ers should have hired the Rex RYan of the era, Jerry Glanville instead.

You just can't win, can you?  lol All of a sudden where you play on defense means you aren't a good player.

Cannot be made up. Can't be.

Hey, do you think the new GM trades Revis or Cromartie? Good thing you drafted one overrated money grabbing primadonna, signed another for no reason and then drafted a nickelback BUST in dwarf, Kylie Wilson. Superb planning!

LMAO

Hmm Greene 4 fumbles, Ridley 4 fumbles.... what were you saying again? 

Ridley a 3rd pick, Greene a 2nd rd pick. Also, Ridley had a much better second year than Greene.

How many TDs? How many carries and touches for each up against the 4 fumbles?

LMAO

You lose again, ticket taker.

Ah yes, when all else fails, lie.  Earlier in the year, you claimed that Wilkerson was in his 3rd year, thus he was a bust.  Now, you're claiming Greene was a 2nd rounder? Why so you can try to make 2nd round bust Vereen look better?  Are you this stupid?  In this case, reading a book may actually help.  The name of the book is "What round was Shonn Greene Drafted In?

You are not only dumb, but ignorant.  Learn the game. Moron!