Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from SandyRowBelfast. Show SandyRowBelfast's posts

    Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    Same old Paties. Cream puff division+ cream puff schedule = cake walk to playoffs. Same thing every year. They get manhandled when they face a good team. Same results every year. Makes to Super Bowl apperence not so deserving.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattC05. Show MattC05's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    IF the Pats had beaten Arizona, Arizona would currently be 3-4... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had beaten Seattle, Seattle would currently be 3-4... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Jets, the Jets would currently be 4-3... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Broncos, the Broncos would currently be 4-2... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Bills, the Bills would currently be 4-3... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from getdrunkstupit. Show getdrunkstupit's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    man handled??? 1 point 1 point 2 point games are being man handled....

    you are so brainy

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    lmao they havent been close to manhandled

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    In response to SandyRowBelfast's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Same old Paties. Cream puff division+ cream puff schedule = cake walk to playoffs. Same thing every year. They get manhandled when they face a good team. Same results every year. Makes to Super Bowl apperence not so deserving.

    [/QUOTE]


    Please show me where they got manhandled?  I would say all 3 games they lost by a total of 4 points combined, they beat themselves.  I think SandyRowBelfast has sand in is V.......!

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from pcmIV. Show pcmIV's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    Raiders troll talking smack.  LMAO.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from pcmIV. Show pcmIV's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    How did that trade for Carson Palmer work out.  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from CablesWyndBairn. Show CablesWyndBairn's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    That's the best thing you could come up with for your 48th post?  Time to go back into hiding SRB. 

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from FrnkBnhm. Show FrnkBnhm's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    The issue is not winning teams, the Patriots have lost to good defenses... 

    Losses to defenses ranked 17th, 4th and 3rd.

    Wins versus defenses ranked 18th, 21st, 31st and 32nd.

    Five games left versus top ten defenses...

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from GoUconn13. Show GoUconn13's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    Look at teams that havent beat much of winning teams.

    Baltimore = 1-2 against winning team

    Houston = 1-1 against winning team

    Pats = 0-3 against winning team.

    Bears = 0-1 against winning team

    Giants = 1-0 against winning team

    SF = 2-2 against winning team

    GB = 2-2 against winning team.

    So there are not much teams that have been dominating anyone.  Yes SF/GB played four wnning teams so far, but that will change by week 17!!!

    Pats got Houston, and SF.  Soon to be Denver will become a winning team where PAts could be 1-3.   But at least Pats played more winning teams than anyone in the AFC!!

    We should be happy to see that!!

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from FrnkBnhm. Show FrnkBnhm's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    In response to GoUconn13's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Look at teams that havent beat much of winning teams.

    Baltimore = 1-2 against winning team

    Houston = 1-1 against winning team

    Pats = 0-3 against winning team.

    Bears = 0-1 against winning team

    Giants = 1-0 against winning team

    SF = 2-2 against winning team

    GB = 2-2 against winning team.

    So there are not much teams that have been dominating anyone.  Yes SF/GB played four wnning teams so far, but that will change by week 17!!!

    Pats got Houston, and SF.  Soon to be Denver will become a winning team where PAts could be 1-3.   But at least Pats played more winning teams than anyone in the AFC!!

    We should be happy to see that!!

    [/QUOTE]

    Is the point that the Ravens, Texans, Giants, 49ers and Packers are all better against teams over .500?

    I still think the issue is losing to good defenses... I think that at the end of the year, the Jets and Broncos will count as quality wins. 

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from digger0862. Show digger0862's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    In response to MattC05's comment:
    [QUOTE]IF the Pats had beaten Arizona, Arizona would currently be 3-4... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had beaten Seattle, Seattle would currently be 3-4... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Jets, the Jets would currently be 4-3... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Broncos, the Broncos would currently be 4-2... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."

    IF the Pats had lost to the Bills, the Bills would currently be 4-3... "Omg, the Pats haven't beaten a team with a winning record."
    [/QUOTE]

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Pats 0-3 vs Winning Teams.

    Ah, SPIN...  don't you love it??!! 

     

Share