Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

     

    In response to 42AND46's comment:

     

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

     

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

     

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

     

    why do people keep falling for these trolls bait tactics?

     




    change your avatar, palestine is made up. they are eqyptians

     

     



    yeah yeah yeah i've heard that BS plenty of times save it for someone who doesn't know any better. 

     

     



    you keep that avatar...oklahoma is probably one of those midwestern redstaters who thinks God is an American and has glenn beck's autograph so u can just ignore him

     

     



    no he's a newt gingrich lover. sheldon adelson pays newt very well to say things like that. rather than work towards peace newt and his handlers would rather dehumanize palestinians and prop us israeli as god's chosen people doing god's work expanding settlements as seen here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KK6basfKMk and here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHWJWJocD6A

     

    thankfully there are also peaceful jews with integrity like gal beckerman who is able to counter newt and adelson making them look like fools. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_jezW2AK8M&list=LLUbb484EiputGY3ZAjLBX5w&feature=mh_lolz

     




    adelson is scum...should be thrown out of this country

    then again many americans are just too dumb and all they know about the middle east they get from the media which is bought and sold and not just fox noize either

    israel say jump america say how high

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    DontQuestionBB

    The Pats should consider trading Wilfork for Picks and/or players.  Kyle love and Deadrick could do the job for alot less

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from auchhhhhhhhhhh. Show auchhhhhhhhhhh's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to DontQuestionBB's comment:

    The Pats should consider trading Wilfork for Picks and/or players.  Kyle love and Deadrick could do the job for alot less.  With that free money, the Pats can keep Talib, look at players like Cromartie, maybe even a William Moore from Atlanta to fill the safety position.

    The Pats passing D is close to last in the league, might as well get something for Wilfork while the value is still there and spread the wealth around.




    Kyle love and Deadrick could do the job   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     

    HA

    HAHA

    HAHA

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from zeitgeist49. Show zeitgeist49's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to DontQuestionBB's comment:

    The Pats should consider trading Wilfork for Picks and/or players.  Kyle love and Deadrick could do the job for alot less.  With that free money, the Pats can keep Talib, look at players like Cromartie, maybe even a William Moore from Atlanta to fill the safety position.

    The Pats passing D is close to last in the league, might as well get something for Wilfork while the value is still there and spread the wealth around.



    The PATS D consists of Wilfork, Nink, linebackers with poor coverage skills and midget DB's with poor coverage skills. They have an inept pass rush and one of the league's worst secondaries. In sum, you have Wilfork, Nink and a bunch of Jags. This D's only strength is against the run. And you want to implode that strength ? BB has demonstrated he is unable to field a solid D without help from prior front office moves. I have no confidence in BB building a D, even around Wilfork. BB trying to build a D without Wilfork. Now that's a scary thought !
     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    Probably one of the more bizarre threads on the forum but hey this forum is many things on occasion and bizarre is certainly one of 'em.  

    Trade Vince?  Good way to make an inconsistent defense consistently bad.

    And up pops the Palestinian/Israeli conflict?  E frigg1n gad.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    "Unsubscribe."

    lol

    it's too bad we can't trade some of our forum posters...

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    on the bright side, the Jets said they wouldn't trade Revis to us but you can bet they'd trade Cromartie for Wilfork. Great suggestion...

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from FLY2K. Show FLY2K's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    Really???????

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

     

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

     

    why do people keep falling for these trolls bait tactics?

     




    change your avatar, palestine is made up. they are eqyptians

     

     



    yeah yeah yeah i've heard that BS plenty of times save it for someone who doesn't know any better. 

     




    Palestinian Nationalism is about as old as Zionism.  Palestinian just refered to some one living in the area not an Arab living in the area until the Pan-Arab movement during the British mandate. Arabs in the Palestine in 1834 killed off most of the Palestinian Jews. This made the Jew a very small minority until Zionism, like less than 10 percent, but even they were just Arabs not Palestinians. To claim they are a people like the Native American forced off their land by murderous coloniziere does really tell the full story.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hetchinspete. Show Hetchinspete's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

     

    Palestinian Nationalism is about as old as Zionism.  Palestinian just refered to some one living in the area not an Arab living in the area until the Pan-Arab movement during the British mandate. Arabs in the Palestine in 1834 killed off most of the Palestinian Jews. This made the Jew a very small minority until Zionism, like less than 10 percent, but even they were just Arabs not Palestinians. To claim they are a people like the Native American forced off their land by murderous coloniziere does really tell the full story.

    [/QUOTE]

    This site is for sports talk not anti-semetic politics. If you want to talk politics go to another site where it's part of the agenda. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In most cases Wilfork has to be double teamed which can only free up another down D lineman. He's big and strong enough to sure the middle of that D line. They may have to go to totally different defensive look. I really don't see him departing NE for awhile. He's their rock.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to DontQuestionBB's comment:

    The Pats should consider trading Wilfork for Picks and/or players.  Kyle love and Deadrick could do the job for alot less.  With that free money, the Pats can keep Talib, look at players like Cromartie, maybe even a William Moore from Atlanta to fill the safety position.

    The Pats passing D is close to last in the league, might as well get something for Wilfork while the value is still there and spread the wealth around.



    Actually, I thought the Pats should have traded Tom Brady years ago.  Oh, wait, this is a joke string isn't it?  Trade your best, and one of the league's best D lineman.. to satisfy a fan whim??!!  yeah, right! 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Homecheese. Show Homecheese's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to harleyroadking1's comment:

    ahhh you make me......

     



    +1 Lol

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Salcon. Show Salcon's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    What...wait, trade big Vince for a Palestinian?

    What kind of nonsense are we talkin' about here?

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from patsbandwagonsince76. Show patsbandwagonsince76's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

     

    Also, besides his impact in the most important defensive position him being a size and strength based player has a longer life span in the NFL than speed and agility based players.

    Not that he isn't very athletic, he will keep that, and quick, he will keep that...but "losing a step" in his world does not mean the same thing as for a wide reciever , RB or CB.

    I think he will be good for a while still.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Pats should consider trading Wilfork.

    In response to Hetchinspete's comment:

     

    Palestinian Nationalism is about as old as Zionism.  Palestinian just refered to some one living in the area not an Arab living in the area until the Pan-Arab movement during the British mandate. Arabs in the Palestine in 1834 killed off most of the Palestinian Jews. This made the Jew a very small minority until Zionism, like less than 10 percent, but even they were just Arabs not Palestinians. To claim they are a people like the Native American forced off their land by murderous coloniziere does really tell the full story.

    This site is for sports talk not anti-semetic politics. If you want to talk politics go to another site where it's part of the agenda. 

    [/QUOTE]

    That post was not antiSemitic at all and it was in response to earlier chatter. It was hardly politic unlike the past too post, it was just historical. 

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share