Reiss roster projections

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from msteven. Show msteven's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    I think Bolden is out and Ridley is in.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from digger0862. Show digger0862's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    Reiss is not wavering with his surprise cut of Ridley but I think Ridley is a lock. He's the best rusher on the team. There are going to be some tough cuts.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    I would still be surprised if Ridley is gone. 

    Things will possibly change between now and week five as an injury or performance could make all the difference to Tyms. I wonder whether he should make it anyway. 

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    Ridley runs violently... he has tremendous collisions and just that alone will be the impetus for a bigger chance to fumble.

    I'm with msteven Bolden is out and Ridley is in.

    Just a hunch but I think Butler goes and T. Wilson stays.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Tydog. Show Tydog's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    No way Bolden stays over Ridley. Unless BB gets a sweet deal on a trade ala TRich to Indy.

    "I swear it upon Zues the most exceptional runner cannot be the equal of an average wrestler"  Socrates

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from fatsam72. Show fatsam72's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:

    Ridley runs violently... he has tremendous collisions and just that alone will be the impetus for a bigger chance to fumble.

    I'm with msteven Bolden is out and Ridley is in.

    Just a hunch but I think Butler goes and T. Wilson stays.



    If Butler goes, I'll eat my hat

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    If Ridley goes and James White stays man-o-man am I missing something.  I've not really see White do much of anything here.  I see Ridley staying, Bolden going and Finch staying over White.   Why? Just a hunch.  Butler over Wilson - hmm, interesting.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:

    Ridley runs violently... he has tremendous collisions and just that alone will be the impetus for a bigger chance to fumble.

    I'm with msteven Bolden is out and Ridley is in.

    Just a hunch but I think Butler goes and T. Wilson stays.



    Four CBs is not enough. One gets hurt and they're scouring the waiver wire and not likely to find one as good as Butler, who will get picked up, probably by Rex. Wilson, on the other hand, would probably go unclaimed and make it to the PS.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from zbellino. Show zbellino's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to rkarp's comment:

    Examining the New England Patriots' roster:

     

    QUARTERBACKS (3)

     

    Tom Brady
    Ryan Mallett
    Jimmy Garoppolo

     

    Might be the best quarterback depth chart, from top to bottom, in Bill Belichick's 15 years as coach.




    Haha. What's up Rkarp.

     

    Don't you think 2001 might have to take that prize. Anytime Drew Bledsoe in his prime is coming to back up Tom Brady, you are doing alright. But I do like how good Jimmy G looks. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    In response to ghostofjri37's comment:

    Ridley runs violently... he has tremendous collisions and just that alone will be the impetus for a bigger chance to fumble.

    I'm with msteven Bolden is out and Ridley is in.

    Just a hunch but I think Butler goes and T. Wilson stays.



    Four CBs is not enough. One gets hurt and they're scouring the waiver wire and not likely to find one as good as Butler, who will get picked up, probably by Rex. Wilson, on the other hand, would probably go unclaimed and make it to the PS.



    Perhaps Butler stays for 4 weeks and then goes when Browner returns. Based on the thinness at LB I think they will keep extra safeties for their sub packages. The safeties in question Wilson, Ebner and Chung all play on ST's so my guess is 2 of those 3 will stay. I could be wrong but we shall see soon enough.

     

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from xXR3S1NXx. Show xXR3S1NXx's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

     

    Id replace Ebner with T.Wilson. Besides maybe special teams Ebner is totally useless. 

     

     

     

    At the end of your rope                                                                                                     

    Hanging by a thread

    He'd give anything for this to just go away

    This grip is only so strong

     

    I try to hold on tightly

    But it's all slipping through my fingers

    In a fleeting moment 

    Aspirations bled dry

    Eyes that once beamed with hope now only stare in remorse.

     

    -Times of grace

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Paul_K. Show Paul_K's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    I just checked out ProFootballFocus's top preseason players over the first three weeks.  Preseason ratings are badly skewed by whether a player was playing against starters or third stringers, and sometimes whether a veteran got much time at all on the field.  For what it's worth, here's who stood out for New England.

    #1 in the NFL, by a mile, at wide receiver:  Tyms.  Tyms may be sitting for four weeks but if he's not playing in week five, 20 or more NFL teams will want a look at him.

    #2 in the NFL at offensive tackle:  Cameron Fleming.  Now that's a fourth round pick!

    #3 in the NFL at running back:  Finch.  In my opinion, ProFootballFocus has lousy metrics that don't take enough off for fumbles.  Other than the fumbles, Finch put up a good number of missed tackles and ran like crazy.

     

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    I really only have 3 questions:

    1st - Gray and Bolden over Ridley? I know fumbles drives BB nuts but if he cuts the best pure runner on the team for a JAG backup and a rook who has shown as much as that JAG backup (but with some upside) then to me that's a fundamental flaw in the feeling zero fumbles but not nearly as effective running is more important than a fumble every 4 games but a much more effective running game. Bolden is not even a BJGE, so downgrading that much because of a couple fumbles is going backwards not forwards.

    2nd - Why not just keep Tyms around? Doesn't hurt the roster and after week 4 it's much easier for him to pass through waivers for PS duty (which I believe is allowed with the new rules)

    3rd - Why Vellano? He hasn't shown much and I think BB is much more endeared with Worthy as a player he liked in the draft and looked just as good as Vellano in his 1 preseason game so far. Just wondering why the love for Vellano over someone with more potential in Worthy who you traded for.

    The rest I think Reiss is dead on about but those questions I do have to wonder. My surprise cut would be Mallett. To me it's clear, Garp is going to be the better QB long term, he looks comfortable out there, and really if Brady goes down I don't think there is much difference if Garp is in there vs Mallett so why waste the roster spot? Lose Mallett and keep an extra S, LB, RB, or DL

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from msteven. Show msteven's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    I think Wilson stays.  My surprise cut would be Slater.  Hard to keep Wilson and Ebner if Slater stays.  All three are special teams players.  Wilson has not looked as bad a Chung.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from NoMorePensionLooting. Show NoMorePensionLooting's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to digger0862's comment:

    Reiss is not wavering with his surprise cut of Ridley but I think Ridley is a lock. He's the best rusher on the team. There are going to be some tough cuts.




    Yes, which is why I think 3 QB is a waste of 1 very valuable roster spot.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to msteven's comment:

    I think Wilson stays.  My surprise cut would be Slater.  Hard to keep Wilson and Ebner if Slater stays.  All three are special teams players.  Wilson has not looked as bad a Chung.




    [object HTMLDivElement]

    I can't agree with that. Slater is consistently voted as one of the top STers in the league. If you are keeping a player for his ST ability (which BB loves his STers) you keep one of the best in the league over STers you hope don't see the field in backup duty

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to msteven's comment:

    I think Wilson stays.  My surprise cut would be Slater.  Hard to keep Wilson and Ebner if Slater stays.  All three are special teams players.  Wilson has not looked as bad a Chung.




    Slater is an All-Pro caliber ST player, I'd be absolutely shocked if he got whacked.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to mbeaulieu07's comment:

    In response to msteven's comment:

    I think Wilson stays.  My surprise cut would be Slater.  Hard to keep Wilson and Ebner if Slater stays.  All three are special teams players.  Wilson has not looked as bad a Chung.




    Slater is an All-Pro caliber ST player, I'd be absolutely shocked if he got whacked.



    As would I.  He is truly an impact player on ST.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from user_4160947. Show user_4160947's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    Reiss has probably heard a thing or two about how the team is shaping up.  I can easily see Ridley getting cut but a trade would be better.  He is powerful but teams are gunning for him.  To my eyes, his effort to hold on to the ball has slowed him down a bit.  Finally, this is a walk year and BB won't resign him anyways (think BJGE and Danny Boy).  A Bolden/Gray combo can probably hold the fort.

    Chris Jones is a JAG! Vellano, too.  I'm really surprised that Kelly got cut for these guys.  If the Kelly cut means that Worthy has shown something, shouldn't he make the final 53 and the other mutts go to the PS?  There's also the theory that BB is building for the future.  YUK!  The future is right now, today.

    I like Tyms much more than Boyce.  He'll get scooped if exposed to waivers but Boyce will go through waivers without a sniff.

    I'd cut Mallet and slot JG for the #2 QB.  Just keep a pool of QBs in the Rolodex.  Without Brady, we're sunk anyways.

    Final thought is that the LBs look real weak after the starters.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    Not sure Ridley is the best we have.  If so, that's not saying much for our backs.

    Look at it this way, when he does run, it's against normally a weak run D as most teams are more afraid of the pass.  He's only had two runs for 30 yards in 3 years.  That's pretty poor.  He can't catch a cold.

    Putting that all together, I'm not sure it's worth all the fumbles, some of which cost us games.

    Might be time to give someone else a try.  Grey, Vereen, White and ???? with devlin, may be enough.

       He won't be here next year.


    "The worse New England has gotten on defense, the better Brady has been forced to become -- with 109 touchdowns, 20 interceptions and a 39-9 record the past three seasons. "

    CLARK JUDGE______7/13/13_____________________________________
                                  

                             

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from crazy-world-of-troybrown. Show crazy-world-of-troybrown's posts

    Re: Reiss roster projections

    In response to NoMorePensionLooting's comment:


    In response to digger0862's comment:


    Reiss is not wavering with his surprise cut of Ridley but I think Ridley is a lock. He's the best rusher on the team. There are going to be some tough cuts.





    Yes, which is why I think 3 QB is a waste of 1 very valuable roster spot.



    Agree with this, you take a chance. To lose Ridley and keep Mallet hurts the team. Ridley contributes now. Mallet you just don't know. Jimmy G, about same position.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share