Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheFantasyBaron. Show TheFantasyBaron's posts

    Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money

    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money:
    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money : Wrong - they drafted Hughes because he was the best player on the board that fit their scheme.  Additionally, Freeney has been dinged up the last few years (was not 100% for the SB).  As Freeney and Mathis get older, its important to have players in the pipeline for when they finally leave, but also to spell them once in a while while still on the team.  Finally, Hughes fits because they let Raheem Brock go which opened a spot. 
    Posted by underdoggggg


    Your comment of Hughes in the pipeline to replace Freeney is the same sort of pie in the sky dreaming I did in the NE SB YEARS. I used to think all the Pats were replaceable and I learned that some are but the specials ones aren't. Actually no one is going to replace Freeney and your team is darned lucky to have him.
     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from ebuddha. Show ebuddha's posts

    Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money

    Hey, Russ.... you a Black Crowes fan by any chance? Hmmmm......
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from unclealfie. Show unclealfie's posts

    Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money

    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money:
    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money :      What?? You don't remember that? More selective amnesia on your part, Dog(gggg)??        Conference Championship - Patriots @ Colts: Face Guarding is when a pass defender blindly (not looking back for the ball) throws up his arms in an attempt to block a pass or disrupt the receivers line of sight on the ball. Someone should notify officials that there is no rule against Face Guarding in the NFL. So when Patriots CB Ellis Hobbs was called for a Face Guarding pass interference late in the 3rd quarter; in reality, it was NFL Officials giving a late Christmas gift to the Colts in the form of a first and goal at the one yard line. But the NFL will remind us fans that they're right 98% of the time, or whatever the latest bogus claim is. Fact...a free trip to the one yard line in a tight conference championship game directly impacts the outcome. Sure would be nice to have big games decided by the players, not the officials.
    Posted by TexasPat3


    How odd that dogturd "couldn't remember" the one particular play that led directly to the colts one and only SB win of the jughead era. Especially given that he claims to remember every real or imagined holding, PI, offsides or illegal motion called against the colts since the beginning of time. 

    Regarding the "they're right 98% of the time" number; it that according to the NFL's own judgment? Is so, I'd seriously be questioning that number. That's like asking dogturd how many of the PI calls against the colts (assuming there's ever beem done, I can't rememeber) were correct. 
     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from bradleyBliss. Show bradleyBliss's posts

    Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money

    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money:
    In Response to Re: Report: Colts' Mathis wants new contract, Mathis skips OTAs over money : Interesting theory.  Sure to get you a lot of local backslaps until its pointed out that these so-called nutless players have beaten the New England nutted ones 5 of the last 6 times.  How are you liking Mankin's nuts today? 
    Posted by underdoggggg



    Hey doggiedodo! How many of those games were in NE???? May be very different over the next 3-4 years...if there is no post Super Bowl loss effect.
     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts