Rkarp

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Getzo. Show Getzo's posts

    Rkarp

    Patriots placed DT Tommy Kelly on injured reserve with a knee injury, ending his season.

    Kelly had missed the last three games due to the injury and may have suffered a setback after attempting to practice on a limited basis this week. With Vince Wilfork already out for the year, his loss leaves New England without both of their starting defensive tackles for the rest of the season. The Patriots will now go with a rotation of Isaac Sopoaga, Chris Jones, and Joe Vellano. OL Josh Kline has been promoted from the practice squad to replace Kelly on the active roster.  

    He called it guys....

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from seawolfxs. Show seawolfxs's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Good get by rk arprk arp

    am disappointed

    I think what was giving me hope was that he went back in the game after being injured and then they took three weeks

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Uncle Rico. Show Uncle Rico's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    I am here to bear witness that indeed rkarp called it.  All praise to rkarp.

     

    Anyone see Harvey?

    He is probably forumulating a plan to counteract this ownage by rkarp.  He is probably in secret talks with the other guy, guagmire, who was also owned because of this development.  When I first started posting here Quagmire seemed cool and then started bashing everyone, becoming, do I dare say, a lo t like Harvey.  Harvey is probably going to come back and either act like nothing happened, which is what all crazy people due, or he is waiting for a negative league story to come out about a player, team, coach, or owner and then he will try and draw all attention to that story and the "mistakes" that player, team, coach has made.

    Harvey, turn in your man card because you are sitting with the grold, brvs

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Rkarp is the real deal and one of the few quality on this board.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Just four hours ago rusty was ridiculing rkarp for posting the thread regarding Kelly, he went so far to say Kelly would of been placed on injured reserve long ago if he had a serious knee injury at his playing weight (per usual he used his own unscientific logic system that never works). Well rkarp was right again and rusty was wrong per usual. This one though was down right surgical...he called this one to a T...perfection. Can you believe rusty and his boy toy quagmire won't give this guy any credit, or slack? It's sick, it really is.

    Rusty 0....rkarp 10000. It's getting embarrassing folks! The warnings were out people! Thanks Bill Belichick...thank you.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:

    I am here to bear witness that indeed rkarp called it.  All praise to rkarp.

     

    Anyone see Harvey?

    He is probably forumulating a plan to counteract this ownage by rkarp.  He is probably in secret talks with the other guy, guagmire, who was also owned because of this development.  When I first started posting here Quagmire seemed cool and then started bashing everyone, becoming, do I dare say, a lo t like Harvey.  Harvey is probably going to come back and either act like nothing happened, which is what all crazy people due, or he is waiting for a negative league story to come out about a player, team, coach, or owner and then he will try and draw all attention to that story and the "mistakes" that player, team, coach has made.

    Harvey, turn in your man card because you are sitting with the grold, brvs

     



    +1

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from user_483130. Show user_483130's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Rkarp - nice job, who is your source?

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: Rkarp


    Rkarp works for the media, my guess is NY media as he knows a lot about the jets, either that or he covers N.E sports but is a Jets fan. He usually has some info before it hits the news so he has some insid3 ties, but he undoubtedly is a Patriot hater and has consistently taken subtle shots at BB, Kraft, and the Patriot organization.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from palookaski. Show palookaski's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Kudos to Rkarp. I appreciate rkarps' well informed contributions, nice job!

    Yes, Rkarp called it about T. Kelly and a few others as well. Rusty, on the other hand was theoretically correct in assuming that if Kelly was done, he would have been put on IR already if not immediately. I think BB knew all along but did'nt want the info disclosed, at that time. I think many, including myself, here were hoping and thinking, just like Rusty. We were wrong, no apologies needed. The foolish name calling is another thing ......

    BB cerainly has his plate full now and if any Coach can still get us to the dance -under these extreme circumstances; BB is the man.

    Thanks to RKarp and all the other real good posters whom make the board, nice reading.... ;-))

     

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from HelmetofLeather. Show HelmetofLeather's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Rkarp need not respond. The fact the a lot in here skewered him after Kelly was "at" practice speaks volumes about the average poster/poser on this board.........Quick to judge usually is a sign of a lack of intelligence........

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    well I am one who owes an apology to Rkarp. I thought you were throwing sh1t against the wall to see what would stick. You were right on TK, but man I am hoping you are wrong on Aquib Talib!

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    "he undoubtedly is a Patriot hater and has consistently taken subtle shots at BB, Kraft, and the Patriot organization."

    hmm well Rusty takes broadside shots on Brady all the time, I assume he is a Patriot hater also? 

    bottom line is "hate" as you define it is subjective, what is not subjective is rkarp brings info into this forum that is accurate and he brings it sooner than others.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    Hey, credit where credit is due.  The guy told us that he had heard rumblings this one was coming and what he reported came to pass.  Take every comment on this board for what it's worth; some have credibility others do not.  Thanks for the heads-up, rkarp. 

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to TrueChamp's comment:


    Rkarp works for the media, my guess is NY media as he knows a lot about the jets, either that or he covers N.E sports but is a Jets fan. He usually has some info before it hits the news so he has some insid3 ties, but he undoubtedly is a Patriot hater and has consistently taken subtle shots at BB, Kraft, and the Patriot organization.



    C'mon Champ . . . he's no Patriot hater.  He just speaks it like he calls it . . . and he's often right, despite the flack he takes from certain Patriots-can-do-no-wrong homers.

    I think Rkarp works for ESPN in event set-up if I'm not mistaken and seems to focus on the Boston area. Said he had his own company that was bought by ESPN.  That gives him access beyond what most people would have, so his information is often based on more facts than the average poster here could possibly have access to.  

     

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from fatsam72. Show fatsam72's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to TrueChamp's comment:


    Rkarp works for the media, my guess is NY media as he knows a lot about the jets, either that or he covers N.E sports but is a Jets fan. He usually has some info before it hits the news so he has some insid3 ties, but he undoubtedly is a Patriot hater and has consistently taken subtle shots at BB, Kraft, and the Patriot organization.



    Weak

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to rkarp's comment:

    Whoa. Let's slow down here. I only repeated what some one told me. there were MANY legit journalists that also were 100% on top of this thru hard work. Their hands were tied in reporting anything thru a legit outlet until it was double confirmed. Extremely hard to do around a BB team. There were countless hard working people who knew this info. I feel their frustration in covering this team when it comes to supplying the fans any info

     



    That's good to know, because I always kind of thought that the media around here was just utterly clueless regarding this team...I mean I can't remember the last time something was reported before it actually happened. Truthfully I don't read anything from anyone around here locally anymore - if I want information on the team I'll come here because someone would of found some sort of link to an outside article. I can't imagine what it must be like covering this team, personally I wonder why they all don't just get together and start approaching it differently...I mean what could the pats do to them? How could they make it worse on them? I guess they could ban them from press conferences, but they get nothing there anyway.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    RKarp: Why can't a sportswriter report what he heard, as long as he qualifies it as unverified, as you did? We're not talking national security here.  No lives would be lost if Joe Reporter comes out and reports that the word is Tommy Kelly is done for the year, but that the team hasn't verified it.

    If that's what he heard, then it's a true statement. What's the problem?

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    RKarp: Why can't a sportswriter report what he heard, as long as he qualifies it as unverified, as you did? We're not talking national security here.  No lives would be lost if Joe Reporter comes out and reports that the word is Tommy Kelly is done for the year, but that the team hasn't verified it.

    If that's what he heard, then it's a true statement. What's the problem?



    Legitimate news outlets just don't operate like that.  You can get those kinds of rumours reported on blogs, but any outlet that wants to maintain its reputation as a credible source of information isn't going to report things that are unconfirmed.  If your brand is based in part on your credibility, you aren't going to risk that brand by reporting heresay and rumour. 

    Also, your sources may clam up if you start reporting whatever they say . . .

     

     

     

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from CatfishHunter. Show CatfishHunter's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    RKarp: Why can't a sportswriter report what he heard, as long as he qualifies it as unverified, as you did? We're not talking national security here.  No lives would be lost if Joe Reporter comes out and reports that the word is Tommy Kelly is done for the year, but that the team hasn't verified it.

    If that's what he heard, then it's a true statement. What's the problem?



    Legitimate news outlets just don't operate like that.  You can get those kinds of rumours reported on blogs, but any outlet that wants to maintain its reputation as a credible source of information isn't going to report things that are unconfirmed.  If your brand is based in part on your credibility, you aren't going to risk that brand by reporting heresay and rumour. 

    Also, your sources may clam up if you start reporting whatever they say . . .

     

     

     




    "Legitimate" news outlets put their "rules" aside all the time.  They don't wait for a 2nd source when there is a big story breaking.   The Boston Bombings and the LA Airport shooting are 2 examples that leap immediately to mind.  The race to get the info out before the competition is more important than getting it double-sourced.  Then they apologize later and say "well, that's what we were told".   Did anyone watch John King from CNN falling all over himself getting everything wrong in the Boston Bombings?  I'm pretty sure CNN is still in business and King is still in their employ.

    If TK's injury was a life/death major story (well, maybe it is for some Pats fans) the media would be much more lax with their "rules".

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Rkarp

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    RKarp: Why can't a sportswriter report what he heard, as long as he qualifies it as unverified, as you did? We're not talking national security here.  No lives would be lost if Joe Reporter comes out and reports that the word is Tommy Kelly is done for the year, but that the team hasn't verified it.

    If that's what he heard, then it's a true statement. What's the problem?



    Legitimate news outlets just don't operate like that.  You can get those kinds of rumours reported on blogs, but any outlet that wants to maintain its reputation as a credible source of information isn't going to report things that are unconfirmed.  If your brand is based in part on your credibility, you aren't going to risk that brand by reporting heresay and rumour. 

    Also, your sources may clam up if you start reporting whatever they say . . .

     



    I'm not talking about hearsay and rumor, I'm talking about credible sources but just not verified by the team.

    I get that sources may clam up, but I see reports ALL THE TIME that say things like "Word is..." or "I'm hearing that...." or "I'm told that..." Not on blogs either, I'm talking about ESPN, etc. As long as it's qualified and you're not saying it's fact, I don't see the problem.

    It seems that media covering the Pats are intimidated by BB. They'll run that sort of unverified story about other teams all the time, but not about the Pats. I guess it's a question of courage. But if you're not getting anything from BB anyway (and you're not), what do you risk by running the sort of story that gets run about other teams routinely? Is he going to give you a longer scowl?

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share