"Patsman 3", thanks for registering recently. Because they released Ty Warren. I just said that. They see more value in the DE spot in a 3-4 and the fact he can play interior 4-3. Meanwhile, Roth, while a very good run stopper as a mostly an OLB 3-4, Plus, if you value the DE Ellis move more, that limits what you can pay a Roth, especially if you want also increase competition at the 4-3 starter or sub rush role by paying/adding ANderson and Carter. Roth upped his price, which is apparently, 3 million, which leads one to believe NE figured they could budget for him under that number, not wanting to wait for that with Roth. I still think he'd be a great addition to lock down a 3-4 set at OLB, but if he's playing games, I always want BB to call the bluff. Team first. It could be Roth is adamant on the 3 mil number and is willing to sit around. If so, so be it. Ellis is a good move as are Anderson and Carter, to see which players fall where in the mix. They didn't have a starting DE outside of a recovering Ron Brace or a concussed Mike Wright.  With Gerard Warren they could have, but felt Ellis was more versatile and has the deeper 3-4 experience.  So, they add both under the cap. As if this is an issue? Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Posted by RidingWithTheKing

I just think it's interesting you just re-registered after being banned and now coincidentally sort of sound like a more polite version of Phat Rex, follwing JUST ME, around this board. Weren't you also the guy who said the pre-cap era was harder than the cap era NFL? Remember? And then you started to sound just like Phat Rex, getting all angry. Now, Phat Rex disappears as McCheaters, and you're starting to post. Also, if you just came back, how would you know I was Rusty?
Posted by RidingWithTheKing

In Response to Re: Roth : Rusty still up to your old habits of not reading posts?  I wasn't banned I was away for about 4 months and my account became in-active so I signed back up.  Sorry for letting the real world get in the way of my posting. How would I know you were Rusty?  Are you serious?  Besides everyone else on here still referring to you as Rusty? no one else posts like you do Rusty.  I could be gone for 50 years, come back, read a few posts, and know immediately which posts were your's no matter what name was used.  Your umm "unique" that way. Oh and I posted in the Oh Albert thread where you were not so sorry to disappoint you that I am not following you around.  Thou since you post in about every single thread its hard not to come across you.
Posted by Patsman3

Excellent answer.  Way to prove your limits once again.
Posted by UD6

How in the he!! would you know if the account doesn't go dormant?  LOL.  I'd imagine you haven't taken a dump in months because you won't let a moment go by without a post.  Or do you just stay on the toilet all day?   I am an active poster on this board and in half the time of your last incarnation you've more than doubled my posting count. 
Posted by UD6

It doesn't go dormant, because I originally registered here in 2007, left until 2009 and still had my original handle.  What a shock!  Underpants is wrong again. Patsman 3 lied just like Phat Rex does. Trust me when I say it's Phat Rex/McCheaters. He plays the poseur Pats fan role and tries to be subliminal, but he's not fooling anyone. It's a nice try, but it's still too obvious. Also, the name "Patsman" is so generic, he's on his 3rd one and the fact he chose that name is so forced, he wants you to think he's really a Pats fan. Again, obvious. He's been blistered so many times off these threads, he can't take the beating anymore, so is trying a different troll technique. Pathetic? Yup.
Posted by RidingWithTheKing

In Response to Re: Roth : Doggy What is your purpose here? You're like a little kid that constantly taunts his sibling for no apparent reason. Do you have delayed developmental syndrome?  (Assuming you are not a child) Please get help and a life somewhere other than a BDC forum.
Posted by pezz4pats

In Response to Re: Roth : I am not saying that King is correct that patsfan3 and phatrex are the same, but I was inactive for over 6 months, and still have my name.
Posted by gln826

In Response to Re: Roth : Sounds great, Phat Rex. Maybe because you thought no one could call you out/your Phat Rex alter ego as Patsman wouldn't be remembered? You know it's funny when McCheaters cools it for 2 days and then you quietly try to sneak in to threads. Your flaw is that you followed my comments around just as Phat Rex does, almost exclusively. Nice try.
Posted by RidingWithTheKing

In Response to Re: Roth : Pezz - I take a bit of an issue with what you are saying.  Yes, I taunt Rusty, but doesn't he do that to nearly everyone in nearly every post unless he agrees completely with the person to whom he is responds?  And as for you, I sense your need to rescue Rusty from me.  Unfortunately, you don't come by being nice. And interestingly, you weren't nice yesterday when you butted in.  Remember yesterday?  We had a long discussion where you kept trying to deflect the conversation to a point where you could hopefully be right, and then you just gave up.  I am still waiting on your response there.  The fact is Pezz, that my comments are generally in response.  And frequently, not unlike you, I attempt to attack attacks.  Unless, of course, its the redhead.
Posted by UD6

In Response to Re: Roth : I didn't give up, merely went to go do something with the kiddos.  Then again, you do have a habit of saying and seeing things that aren't true. Your responses are mostly opportunities to get in a dig with Rusty or Tex or Brady or BB and the Pats as a whole. (trolling) Thanks for bring attention your thread response.  Having 2100+ posts on another teams forum in less than a year is quite odd and only solidifies my impression of you. In responses to your deflected statements. I do not believe Dung knew nothing about taping teams especially since it's legal.  Therefore I think he is a liar. I also do not believe Dung didn't know about or condone any thing his expert signal stealer was doing, to include taping.   He was the head coach and is responsible for what is happening outside of the lines too.  Why have a safe cracker on the payrol if you never plan on cracking safes. He knew exactly what was going on, if not, he's the only HC in the World that didn't. As far as Rusty goes, LOL. He does not need my help.  His does a fine job of slapping you around all by his lonesome. And if you didn't appreciate me calling you out for being a troll, well all I can say is, don't act like one.  I'm sure I'm not the first or last to do so. I call it as I see it!
Posted by pezz4pats