Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Roth

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Macrawn. Show Macrawn's posts

    Re: Roth

    There was a point where he was really a missing piece. Now he's not with the line signings. We have a linebacker core currently that can get the job done without Roth. He would be a nice pickup but he has no leverage because we really don't need him anymore. 
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: Roth

    In Response to Re: Roth:
    Excellent answer.  Way to prove your limits once again.
    Posted by UD6


    Doggy
    What is your purpose here?
    You're like a little kid that constantly taunts his sibling for no apparent reason.
    Do you have delayed developmental syndrome?  (Assuming you are not a child)
    Please get help and a life somewhere other than a BDC forum.
     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from gln826. Show gln826's posts

    Re: Roth

    In Response to Re: Roth:
    How in the he!! would you know if the account doesn't go dormant?  LOL.  I'd imagine you haven't taken a dump in months because you won't let a moment go by without a post.  Or do you just stay on the toilet all day?   I am an active poster on this board and in half the time of your last incarnation you've more than doubled my posting count. 
    Posted by UD6


    I am not saying that King is correct that patsfan3 and phatrex are the same, but I was inactive for over 6 months, and still have my name.
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from gln826. Show gln826's posts

    Re: Roth

    UD6, I didnt say his didnt go dormant, I said mine didnt.  Also, did I say those 2 were the same person?  I think not, so read what I said before jumping into a reply.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: Roth

    In Response to Re: Roth:
    In Response to Re: Roth : Pezz - I take a bit of an issue with what you are saying.  Yes, I taunt Rusty, but doesn't he do that to nearly everyone in nearly every post unless he agrees completely with the person to whom he is responds?  And as for you, I sense your need to rescue Rusty from me.  Unfortunately, you don't come by being nice. And interestingly, you weren't nice yesterday when you butted in.  Remember yesterday?  We had a long discussion where you kept trying to deflect the conversation to a point where you could hopefully be right, and then you just gave up.  I am still waiting on your response there.  The fact is Pezz, that my comments are generally in response.  And frequently, not unlike you, I attempt to attack attacks.  Unless, of course, its the redhead.
    Posted by UD6


    I didn't give up, merely went to go do something with the kiddos. 
    Then again, you do have a habit of saying and seeing things that aren't true.
    Your responses are mostly opportunities to get in a dig with Rusty or Tex or Brady or BB and the Pats as a whole. (trolling)
    Thanks for bring attention your thread response.  Having 2100+ posts on another teams forum in less than a year is quite odd and only solidifies my impression of you.
    In responses to your deflected statements. I do not believe Dung knew nothing about taping teams especially since it's legal.  Therefore I think he is a liar.
    I also do not believe Dung didn't know about or condone any thing his expert signal stealer was doing, to include taping.   He was the head coach and is responsible for what is happening outside of the lines too.  Why have a safe cracker on the payrol if you never plan on cracking safes.
    He knew exactly what was going on, if not, he's the only HC in the World that didn't.
    As far as Rusty goes, LOL. He does not need my help.  His does a fine job of slapping you around all by his lonesome.
    And if you didn't appreciate me calling you out for being a troll, well all I can say is, don't act like one.  I'm sure I'm not the first or last to do so.
    I call it as I see it!
     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from PMacPatFan. Show PMacPatFan's posts

    Re: Roth

    Finally....someone prepared to talk about Roth! Hey, thanks for getting back to football!
     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts