Rusty Banned AGAIN?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from danemcmenamin. Show danemcmenamin's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:

     

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

     

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

     

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

     

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    I'm actually trying to figure out what changed on this forum.  I think he made it to over 10k posts on RidingWithTheKing and that was over at least a year.  Now he gets banned every few months at the most.  Are more people reporting him?  Does he insult people more now? Or are the mods just paying more attention?  I wonder what it is.

     




    It's the 10 people or so I take on who all wildly report and overload the mods.  Once that happens, they stop deleting my posts, post by post, they eliminate the entire account.

     

    It's the same story every time.  Babe can call names, I can't, etc.  Babe is a mod/has connections.

    It's impossible that he hasn't been banned as he calls people "dumbkoff".  The overblown obvious nature of his/their hypocrisy is worth getting banned.

     

     




    As usual you have NO CLUE junior. You're really the only one I call names. That's the difference. You call anybody who disagrees with you names. LMAO@U

     

     



    The funniest part is that he was telling me just a few days ago to go and get a life and yet he himself can't stand to be away from an internet forum for 24 hours. And he continues to talk about the hypocrisy of others

     

     



    I am pretty sure I was talking about how you claim to be at BC/in college and are here monitoring others' opinions.

     

    Me having a window open as I work isn't hard to do. In fact, that's what I envision MOST people do here anyway.

    YOU, on the other hand are IN COLLEGE, or you claim to be.  I wasn't in front of a computer monitoring adults' comments in the early days of the interwebs like a dork like you are right now, I can tell you that.

    You're a millenial with weak social skills, 6 video game consoles, an addiction to texting, and a sense of entitlement.  I hope you can get past all that by the time you hit 30, though. Good luck.

     

     



    Yeah make up things in your head, Rusty by all intents and purposses there wasn't much of an internet when you went to college so you'd have had a hard time "monitoring" it., I have a shortcut tab brings me right here. I'm sure others do as well, it takes me seconds. Sometimes i'm on here when i'm in the middle of typing something up, other times i'm just on here to pass some time. Have you really been to college? there's quite a bit of down time and I can hardly go partying at 1 o clock in the day. 

    Hey if you can talk like that so can I, I have great social skills Rusty people seem to like me in the real world you'd be shocked to hear furthermore I have all of zero games consoles, i've never been into them. I'm quite bad at them you see. I don't have an addiction to txting because i'm not a girl ,do you think 20 year old guys spend all day txting their friends? I have 4 best friends and i've had them since I was 12, if i txt any of them to see how there day had went or whatever else i'd never hear the end of it! Finally I don't want to go into but I am not entitled i'm a da mn hard worker and I wouldn't come from what you'd call a mansion far from it in fact 3 bed 1 bath terraced house. I hope you can get over your addiction to this forum and whatever else it is you're at online before your 80th, it's the next big one isn't it OLD MAN

     

     



    Can you even name one thread about football here where you made a good point or contributed to a discussion? No, you can't. Case closed.

     

     

     



    Yeah and you'd ever admit if I made a good point, that'd really happen the only good points to you are the ones that are carbon copys of your points. You only agree with people who agree with you. I was right about adderall for one, you could never admit that so you kept switching the argument to the hypocrisy of the matter over HGH (which was a fine point and one I wasn't aware of but it doesn't change the fact cheating is cheating, it doesn't matter to what level the cheating is on). Also what case are you talking about you OLD MAN did you just bring this case and close it yourself? Well done!!! Talking to yourself must be great, you'll never argue again

     

     



    No, you weren't right about Adderrall at all.  Caffeine, Ritalin, Adderall does not give any athlete a distinct advantage and they certainly aren't masking agents like you claimed.

     

    In fact, when I proved to you it's not, that's when you flew off the handle all insecure. You also didn't understand cocaine could be seen as an upper like Adderall, but cocaine is listed under a different category, as a non-performance enhancer.  Something to keep me awake has no bearing on performance on the field.

    Further, you also see no hypocrisy in Goodell testing for Adderall of all things and and ignoring the NFL STILL not testing for HGH.  You didn't like my counter-points because it supported my contention of Goodell being a hypocrite in fear of brand name drugs my pharmaceutical companies but allowing the union to call the shots with HGH.

    I can't conceded a point to any kid who is wrong and thinks he knows everything. 

     

     

    Adderall is on the list of banned substances because the NFL considers it a performance enhancing drug (increases focus and provides an energy boost).  Here's the official list if you're interested:

    http://images.nflplayers.com/mediaResources/files/Banned%20Substance%20List.pdf

     

    A comment on Adderall's performance-enhancing effects from a NY Times article on the use of the drug among athletes:

     

    Dr. Leah Lagos, a New York sports psychologist who has worked with college and professional athletes, said she had seen patients who have used Adderall. She said she believed the rise in its use by professional athletes mimicked the use by college students. Just a few years ago, she said, it was estimated that 1 in 10 college students was abusing stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin. That estimate, Lagos said, has almost doubled.

    “It’s certainly a performance-enhancing drug,” Lagos said. “College kids call it the Superman drug. Take someone who is tired after a long practice, give them a stimulant. It amps up their mood and energy. It really enhances their focus, and for football players, that’s crucial.

    “Athletes are often taking it to fight fatigue and exhaustion. It’s almost like taking 100 cups of coffee. They can take it during training camp when their bodies are especially fatigued, and the other is right before a game, to boost them. Those are two patterns that are being reported most frequently. But there is the party scene, too, and that’s happening on a larger level.”

     




     

    Yep. I mentioned this on those debates, Prolate. In fact, I mentioned I have friends who like to pop one from time to time.

    I am well aware of the affects of the drug. But, if someone wanted to drink a couple gallons of coffee before a game, it's not illegal. 

    The fact is, that's a drug they don't abused. If it is abused and the drugs runs amuck across the NFL, then they're negligent and open to a lawsuit so they put it on the list to cover themselves.

    Macmanenimin and TFB12s premise that it was a masking agent for steroid, which is false.

    I don't put Ritalin, Adderall or 100 cups of coffee into the same class as HGH or anabolic steroids that are out there. I know the NFL does, but they were wrong in saying it was a masking agent.

    It is absolutely a college thing. Kids take it to stay up to cram for tests, good or bad.

    Is that an advantage? I don't think so.

     



    Hey Prolate if you want the real story, Rusty claimed Vodka and Red bull or 5 or so cups of coffee would do the same thing as adderall. Rusty you're so wrong, comparing 2 different drugs AGAIN! Caffeine and Amphetamines, come on man you never see anyone have 10 cups of coffee then head to a club. It wouldn't be the same at all. I find it funny he invents these mistakes he's made and also left out the stupidest thing i've ever heard him come out with, stop saying I called it a masking agent I never did that was never my point. I don't even know where you got it from to be honest, must be that Old brain of yours

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from digger0862. Show digger0862's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    Deja vu?

    Hey Phizzledickus and RussGriswold, time to put on the gloves and end this feud!**UPDATE** ITS OVER! POLLS R CLOSED! Russgriswold is the most annoying poster! Thanks for voting!

    Edit: Phizzeldickus, MatildaWanna and JerrySpringer are the same poster.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    ^^^^

    Junior, TRIM THESE REPLIES DOWN. I'm sure with your 154 IQ you can manage that. People don't want to have to scroll down half a page to see your latest idiotic comment.

     



    Wait, I thought Rusty's IQ was 152?  Is this what happens when Geaux-Tigres gives Rusty his 2 "sense."   :-)

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to GEAUX-TIGRES's comment:

     

    You know, supporting Russ isn't all a bad thing because it's easy to see at times that the Pats should have more balance offensively. If some of the more physical teams can both stop the run and apply pressure on TB with a four man front, than the point is moot. There's very little semblance of play action when the opposing D stymies the run attack and dictates that TB beats them with his arm. This scenario usually occurs when NE starts climbing those rungs and find themselves in the POs with the same recurring theme each year. Believe me I understand that the Giants have definitely diminished their ability to chase you down and injuries are no excuse. They pretty much sucked this year, I accept it and move on. One word. Physicality. Either through the draft or free agency, the Pats need a bad boy on both sides of the ball. They have holes, but so do nearly all NFL franchises. If they can address those needs and be lucky enough to find those diamonds in the rough, that could spell SB. Until then, they could remain bridesmaids and TB loses sight of ever winning the big one. That would be shameful.

     




    its apparent that they made a point to be more balanced during the regular season and even in the texans game....they totally went away from it in the ravens game however....if brady was more successful in the intermediate passing game, they wouldnt have missed the running game that much....but since they werent, the lack of running the ball really showed up big. obviously ridley got knocked out and made it tougher to run from that point forward.

     




    Spoken like a true Rustyclone.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to GEAUX-TIGRES's comment:

     

    You know, supporting Russ isn't all a bad thing because it's easy to see at times that the Pats should have more balance offensively. If some of the more physical teams can both stop the run and apply pressure on TB with a four man front, than the point is moot. There's very little semblance of play action when the opposing D stymies the run attack and dictates that TB beats them with his arm. This scenario usually occurs when NE starts climbing those rungs and find themselves in the POs with the same recurring theme each year. Believe me I understand that the Giants have definitely diminished their ability to chase you down and injuries are no excuse. They pretty much sucked this year, I accept it and move on. One word. Physicality. Either through the draft or free agency, the Pats need a bad boy on both sides of the ball. They have holes, but so do nearly all NFL franchises. If they can address those needs and be lucky enough to find those diamonds in the rough, that could spell SB. Until then, they could remain bridesmaids and TB loses sight of ever winning the big one. That would be shameful.

     




    its apparent that they made a point to be more balanced during the regular season and even in the texans game....they totally went away from it in the ravens game however....if brady was more successful in the intermediate passing game, they wouldnt have missed the running game that much....but since they werent, the lack of running the ball really showed up big. obviously ridley got knocked out and made it tougher to run from that point forward.

     

     




    Spoken like a true Rustyclone.

     




    your replies are always so well thought out.....not.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    ^^^^

    Junior, TRIM THESE REPLIES DOWN. I'm sure with your 154 IQ you can manage that. People don't want to have to scroll down half a page to see your latest idiotic comment.

     



    Wait, I thought Rusty's IQ was 152?  Is this what happens when Geaux-Tigres gives Rusty his 2 "sense."   :-)

     




    I gave him an extra two points for "the voices".

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

     i guarantee you we have some socially awkward folks in this forum based on their over-infatuation with one player or players and their over-distain for other parts of the team.

     

     


    Oh, you mean like Rusty salivating over every bad draft pick BB makes?

     




    just in the past three drafts, he has drafted hightower, spikes, mccourty, jones, gronkowski, hernandez, ridley, vereen, and solder.....thats bad drafting?

     

     




    Gronk was a great pick despite his injury at the worst times issue. Solder was a solid pick, but should be considering where he was taken. Hernandez was good for the 4th round. Vereen so far looks like a fairly poor second round pick. Ridley is okay for a 3rd rounder, so far.

     

    But all the defensive picks have yet to show themselves as being outstanding.

     

    I don't see great drafting there. I see average at best.

     



    yep, its official....you are on crack.

     

     




    I'm on crack because I call a RB who just averaged .2 ypc more than the league average and did not get it done too often when the going was tough "okay"?

     

    I'm on crack because I called a TE that can't really be an effective TE nor an effective WR a "good" pick for the 4th round?

     

    Looks like you're the one on crack.

     



    hernandez has been a very effective tight end in the league already and it was only his third year, same with gronk. many believe hern is even a top 5 tight end in the league when healthy, so yea he is a pretty damn good 4th round pick. he also would have been drafted higher had he not been caught smoking a blunt. BB doesnt care about players' pasts as long as they perform well and behave while they are patriots....i.e talib, harrison, dillon, ocho...

     

    as far as ridley, he had more yards and a higher YPC average than ray rice this year, oh yeah hes just average...cut it out.




    So I said Hern was a good pick, you say I'm on crack for saying that, then you say it was a good pick. Alrighty then.

    Then you try and portray Ridley's .2 ypc over the league average as something wildly better than my "okay" assessment by pulling out the worst year Ray Rice has ever had for comparison. Alrighty again.

     

    Maybe somebody out there with a brain will find your spin compelling. I doubt it.

     

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

     i guarantee you we have some socially awkward folks in this forum based on their over-infatuation with one player or players and their over-distain for other parts of the team.

     

     


    Oh, you mean like Rusty salivating over every bad draft pick BB makes?

     




    just in the past three drafts, he has drafted hightower, spikes, mccourty, jones, gronkowski, hernandez, ridley, vereen, and solder.....thats bad drafting?

     

     




    Gronk was a great pick despite his injury at the worst times issue. Solder was a solid pick, but should be considering where he was taken. Hernandez was good for the 4th round. Vereen so far looks like a fairly poor second round pick. Ridley is okay for a 3rd rounder, so far.

     

    But all the defensive picks have yet to show themselves as being outstanding.

     

    I don't see great drafting there. I see average at best.

     



    yep, its official....you are on crack.

     

     




    I'm on crack because I call a RB who just averaged .2 ypc more than the league average and did not get it done too often when the going was tough "okay"?

     

    I'm on crack because I called a TE that can't really be an effective TE nor an effective WR a "good" pick for the 4th round?

     

    Looks like you're the one on crack.

     



    hernandez has been a very effective tight end in the league already and it was only his third year, same with gronk. many believe hern is even a top 5 tight end in the league when healthy, so yea he is a pretty damn good 4th round pick. he also would have been drafted higher had he not been caught smoking a blunt. BB doesnt care about players' pasts as long as they perform well and behave while they are patriots....i.e talib, harrison, dillon, ocho...

     

    as far as ridley, he had more yards and a higher YPC average than ray rice this year, oh yeah hes just average...cut it out.

     




    So I said Hern was a good pick, you say I'm on crack for saying that, then you say it was a good pick. Alrighty then.

     

    Then you try and portray Ridley's .2 ypc over the league average as something wildly better than my "okay" assessment by pulling out the worst year Ray Rice has ever had for comparison. Alrighty again.

     

    Maybe somebody out there with a brain will find your spin compelling. I doubt it.

     

     




    you said hern was "good for a 4th round pick"

    hernandez was a good pick, PERIOD.

    and ridley had a very good year this year and will only get better.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheExaminer. Show TheExaminer's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    I've never understood why he keeps getting banned either to be honest. I agree with a lot of what he says, and although he can be bellicose (even moreso than I am), it's rare that he really goes over the line. He stands up for what he beleives, I'll give him that. Generally I'd say its better to leave well enough alone with him. If he's attacking you personally then by all means fire back. But a lot of the fights that get picked with him are third and fourth posters that come into arguments that someone else started. If you get blasted by him then, it's your own fault. I personally have never had a run in with him, and have agreed with him more than I disagreed--probably somewhere between 60-70% of the time I agree he has valid points.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to UD6's comment:

    What amazes me is that Babe doesn't also get banned given some of his responses.  Makes me wonder if Babe is the one to report him.  They get into it so frequently, that it wouldn't surprise me. 




    LOL, nah babe wouldn't do that

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    Come on Babe. You both have legitimate points and gripes. I call them as I see them. And I'm no one's clone. Please don't tell me to learn the game. I'd spent countless hours viewing and reveiwing tape. I was a special teams coach years ago in what I call SEC country. High school level or not. Don't carry this hate you have for Russ with you to your grave. It's infantile.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to GEAUX-TIGRES's comment:

    Come on Babe. You both have legitimate points and gripes. I call them as I see them. And I'm no one's clone. Please don't tell me to learn the game. I'd spent countless hours viewing and reveiwing tape. I was a special teams coach years ago in what I call SEC country. High school level or not. Don't carry this hate you have for Russ with you to your grave. It's infantile.



    he was replying to me

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

     i guarantee you we have some socially awkward folks in this forum based on their over-infatuation with one player or players and their over-distain for other parts of the team.

     

     


    Oh, you mean like Rusty salivating over every bad draft pick BB makes?

     




    just in the past three drafts, he has drafted hightower, spikes, mccourty, jones, gronkowski, hernandez, ridley, vereen, and solder.....thats bad drafting?

     

     




    Gronk was a great pick despite his injury at the worst times issue. Solder was a solid pick, but should be considering where he was taken. Hernandez was good for the 4th round. Vereen so far looks like a fairly poor second round pick. Ridley is okay for a 3rd rounder, so far.

     

    But all the defensive picks have yet to show themselves as being outstanding.

     

    I don't see great drafting there. I see average at best.

     



    yep, its official....you are on crack.

     

     




    I'm on crack because I call a RB who just averaged .2 ypc more than the league average and did not get it done too often when the going was tough "okay"?

     

    I'm on crack because I called a TE that can't really be an effective TE nor an effective WR a "good" pick for the 4th round?

     

    Looks like you're the one on crack.

     



    hernandez has been a very effective tight end in the league already and it was only his third year, same with gronk. many believe hern is even a top 5 tight end in the league when healthy, so yea he is a pretty damn good 4th round pick. he also would have been drafted higher had he not been caught smoking a blunt. BB doesnt care about players' pasts as long as they perform well and behave while they are patriots....i.e talib, harrison, dillon, ocho...

     

    as far as ridley, he had more yards and a higher YPC average than ray rice this year, oh yeah hes just average...cut it out.

     




    So I said Hern was a good pick, you say I'm on crack for saying that, then you say it was a good pick. Alrighty then.

     

    Then you try and portray Ridley's .2 ypc over the league average as something wildly better than my "okay" assessment by pulling out the worst year Ray Rice has ever had for comparison. Alrighty again.

     

    Maybe somebody out there with a brain will find your spin compelling. I doubt it.

     

     

     




    you said hern was "good for a 4th round pick"

     

    hernandez was a good pick, PERIOD.

    and ridley had a very good year this year and will only get better.



    You think Hern would be a good pick if he were 1st or 2nd round? I don't. That high he would be a "meh" pick.

    And your spin on Ridley is cute and all but it doesn't change the fact he averaged .2 ypc more than average.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from palookaski. Show palookaski's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    ;)

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    there is no point in banning people on this site, they can just make new accounts and be right back on the forum in no time.




    LOL, rusty pulled clark of the bench. Looks like Clark's been around for 3 years just sitting around collecting dust

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to GEAUX-TIGRES' comment:

    Come on Babe. You both have legitimate points and gripes. I call them as I see them. And I'm no one's clone. Please don't tell me to learn the game. I'd spent countless hours viewing and reveiwing tape. I was a special teams coach years ago in what I call SEC country. High school level or not. Don't carry this hate you have for Russ with you to your grave. It's infantile.




    I don't recall telling you to learn the game. I don't recall having any problems with you in general rather than an exchange a week ago or so where your agenda was manifesting itself. Generally, you shoot pretty straight. His points are weak.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

     



    Did you just say you were objective?  You're the same guy last year that called BB an "average" GM which was actually LAST YEAR's excuse for Brady for you.

     

     



     

    When a GM spends 12 of 16 first and second round picks on defense over half a decade and that defense ranks near the bottom of the league in yards given up, many would say calling him above average was being far too kind.

     

    As a matter of fact, I would say if Rexy's jets had done exactly the same thing you would be crucifying them from the rooftops for their incompetence.

     

    In contrast, I can admit Brady did not play well against the Ravens, but simply note everybody else played worse which affected his play. Objectivity. That's what I have and you don't dumbkoff.

     

     




    well, you might be making some progress.

     

     

    baby steps.




    as are you.

     

    micro steps.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: Rusty Banned AGAIN?

    Thanks Babe.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share