RUSTY'S BEST YET???

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    He waa wrong about the defense, but it didn't help that half of that defense got injured during the game.



    Kid, look..Do your homework. You're young, but some advice: Do your homework first.

     



    Ha well it was jints who made the thread so it may be taken with a grain of salt. But all I'm saying is that you may have been wrong about the chiefs defense, but a big part of that was due to the injuries. That isn't fair? 

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    He waa wrong about the defense, but it didn't help that half of that defense got injured during the game.



    Kid, look..Do your homework. You're young, but some advice: Do your homework first.

     



    Ha well it was jints who made the thread so it may be taken with a grain of salt. But all I'm saying is that you may have been wrong about the chiefs defense, but a big part of that was due to the injuries. That isn't fair? 



    Umm, I wasn't wrong if the Chiefs D was superior all year to the Colts.  So, you make no sense.

    Why did you turn so dumb?  Seriously. You are promoting Gunty as he spreads wrong information.

    Suggestion: Do not support trolls.

     



    C'mon now, you are smart enough to know I'm not supporting jints here. Obviously the chiefs had a better defense than the colts during the regular season, but that doesn't change what I said. The chiefs imploded on defense vs the colts due in large part to numerous injuries.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    [/QUOTE]

    While i agree it is pretty humorous it is pretty much neck and neck with this thread...

    FEAR NOT JINTS WILL WIN 10 GAMES

    [/QUOTE]

    the difference Ghosty is I will not only own up and have some fun with it but rarely if ever post things like this (and this was only half serious to begin with)

    ol Russ posts nonsense in declarative tones all the time, never admits mistakes or being wrong and rarely makes anything fun

    his reputation and behavior makes the above funnier than ever

    [/QUOTE]

    the differene is this; at least Rusty is a Patriots fan and belongs in this forum. Your a Gints fan trolling here. You dont have the right to judge Rusty or anybody else in here.  

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from crazy-world-of-troybrown. Show crazy-world-of-troybrown's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:

    While i agree it is pretty humorous it is pretty much neck and neck with this thread...

    FEAR NOT JINTS WILL WIN 10 GAMES



    the difference Ghosty is I will not only own up and have some fun with it but rarely if ever post things like this (and this was only half serious to begin with)

    ol Russ posts nonsense in declarative tones all the time, never admits mistakes or being wrong and rarely makes anything fun

    his reputation and behavior makes the above funnier than ever



the differene is this; at least Rusty is a Patriots fan and belongs in this forum. Your a Gints fan trolling here. You dont have the right to judge Rusty or anybody else in here.  



Agree.

 
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from glenr. Show glenr's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    About half the media 'experts' were wrong on all their picks last weekend so at least rusty has plenty of company.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from MoreRings. Show MoreRings's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:

    While i agree it is pretty humorous it is pretty much neck and neck with this thread...

    FEAR NOT JINTS WILL WIN 10 GAMES



    the difference Ghosty is I will not only own up and have some fun with it but rarely if ever post things like this (and this was only half serious to begin with)

    ol Russ posts nonsense in declarative tones all the time, never admits mistakes or being wrong and rarely makes anything fun

    his reputation and behavior makes the above funnier than ever



  • the differene is this; at least Rusty is a Patriots fan and belongs in this forum. Your a Gints fan trolling here. You dont have the right to judge Rusty or anybody else in here.  



    No doubt, come Saturday Rusty is a Pats fan.  Gunty, meadowland moron, bustchise etc are all haters rooting for the Colts.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    In response to glenr's comment:

    About half the media 'experts' were wrong on all their picks last weekend so at least rusty has plenty of company.



    I went 3-1. Jamal charles avoids a concussion and i go 4-0.  I do not see how that is being wrong.

    Your argument is just lame, it really is. 

    That would be like me saying that if the Bengals scored more points they would have won and I would have been 4-0. 

    You have to be the biggest excuse maker on the forum.  My question to you is... Do you really believe the trash you post here or is it all just an act?  I really hope you are just trolling most the time because nobody can seriously be as big of a homer as you are.  Your biggest faults are you can't admit to ever being wrong and you can't be objective.  My gosh, the garbage you spew here most the time is just plain ridiculous.  I gotta bet it's just a big act because really, you have something wrong with you if it isn't all an act.


     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from bgreenuws. Show bgreenuws's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    [/QUOTE]

    Kid, look..Do your homework. You're young, but some advice: Do your homework first.

    [/QUOTE]

    I see you got kicked off the forum (again), DeadAhead, and had to re-register under a new name "DeadAhead2". I do commend you for keeping things transparent. Here is some homework I did a couple weeks back to prove who the trolls on this forum really are, in case anyone missed it:

    Daily Comment Analysis of the 22 users who have posted to this thread:

    Half of the users submit less than four Posts-per-day (PPD) to the various forums on Boston.com. Ten more submit approximately 5 to 12 PPD. Those 21 people average 4.9 PPD. Then, all alone, way out on Pluto of statistical outliers, is DeadAhead, who has averaged over NINETY posts per day! (90.92 to be exact). That is 19 times more than the avergae user, and 8 times more that the 2nd most-frequect poster!

    Consider the total amount of time it takes to submit 91 posts per day. The reading of the thread, the reading of other peoples comments, the time to write your own thoughts, etc. We're clearly talking about a person with a lot a time available to dedicate to anonymous bulletin board trolling and hate-baiting, with little-to-nothing else better to do in life:

     

    Rusty, you average 91 posts per day. That is a FACT. Most regular users here average 4-12 posts per day. Put it this way: The average male probably urinates 4 to 12 times a day. But Rusty, you take a leak all over these message boards 91 times a day! If you saw a guy at your office, getting up from his desk and going to take a leak 91 times per day, it is completely normal to say: "Hey, I think there is something wrong with that guy". Not only that, I'd think "Wow, 91 times a day. Forget about whatever problems are causing that guy to urinate 91 times a day, just think of the amount of time used to take 91 pisses in a day?" It's a lot of time, Rusty. A LOT of time.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from bgreenuws. Show bgreenuws's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:

    Sounds great, Bustchise.   Anyone comparing taking a leak to typing a word or a letter into a thread on the interwebs, might be considered clinical, which clearly you are.

    I am still chuckling at you calling me "Rusty" being so new here. You have no idea what it means or in no way could have any backstory to be so involved here.

    Exposed, Bustchise.



    RUSTY!

     
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from ccnsd. Show ccnsd's posts

    Re: RUSTY'S BEST YET???

    In response to bgreenuws' comment:

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:



    Kid, look..Do your homework. You're young, but some advice: Do your homework first.



    I see you got kicked off the forum (again), DeadAhead, and had to re-register under a new name "DeadAhead2". I do commend you for keeping things transparent. Here is some homework I did a couple weeks back to prove who the trolls on this forum really are, in case anyone missed it:

    Daily Comment Analysis of the 22 users who have posted to this thread:

    Half of the users submit less than four Posts-per-day (PPD) to the various forums on Boston.com. Ten more submit approximately 5 to 12 PPD. Those 21 people average 4.9 PPD. Then, all alone, way out on Pluto of statistical outliers, is DeadAhead, who has averaged over NINETY posts per day! (90.92 to be exact). That is 19 times more than the avergae user, and 8 times more that the 2nd most-frequect poster!

    Consider the total amount of time it takes to submit 91 posts per day. The reading of the thread, the reading of other peoples comments, the time to write your own thoughts, etc. We're clearly talking about a person with a lot a time available to dedicate to anonymous bulletin board trolling and hate-baiting, with little-to-nothing else better to do in life:

     

    Rusty, you average 91 posts per day. That is a FACT. Most regular users here average 4-12 posts per day. Put it this way: The average male probably urinates 4 to 12 times a day. But Rusty, you take a leak all over these message boards 91 times a day! If you saw a guy at your office, getting up from his desk and going to take a leak 91 times per day, it is completely normal to say: "Hey, I think there is something wrong with that guy". Not only that, I'd think "Wow, 91 times a day. Forget about whatever problems are causing that guy to urinate 91 times a day, just think of the amount of time used to take 91 pisses in a day?" It's a lot of time, Rusty. A LOT of time.



    It doesn't really matter what name he uses. He is pretty easy to spot. He can be recognized by his constant Brady and Mankins bashing. Watch your spelling around him. When he wants to get out of an argument he knows he is losing he goes after your spelling.  

     
  • Sections
    Shortcuts