SB 46

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to RockScully's comment:

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to PhatRex's comment:

    The only thing better than watching you losers cry about how it's Brady's fault you gave up 28 points to the great Joe Flacco a couple of weeks ago is watching you blame Brady for giving up a 90 yard drive to lose the superbowl LAST YEAR.  Get over it you flippinfags.




    flacco had 11 td and zero int's this postseason. the pats defense isnt the only defense he had success against. he actually scored 6 points more on the niners defense than he did on the pats defense....but all we hear is how bad the pats defense is?

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: SB 46

    Are we trying to change history bringing this game up AGAIN??!!  Let it go!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to AZPAT's comment:

    In response to mthurl's comment:

     

    In response to AZPAT's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

     

    "Ball was high and to the outside. It turned him to the outside." - Analyst, Scott Zolak

     

     



     

     



    ROFLMFAO!!!   STILL!!!!!

     

    Babe, this play was NOT in the end zone. Yet, you keep devining that IF he caught the ball they WOULD have scored a TD. Just admitt that teh GMen played teh entire 60 minutes BETTER than the Pats did, AGAIN. But, if this Welker "drop" issue is true, then we'll put blame on the SF loss right where it needs to be... Vern Davis. Do you recall the wide pass he dropped inside the 30 yd line? Most assuredly, THAT drive would have ended up as a TD and the ultimate game winner, lights out or not.  And, the timing of the play in regards to the game clock is inconsequential, could be 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Qtr, or in the final minute of play. A drop is a drop, is a drop.....

    Just let it go...... 

     



    Well let's say he catches the thing - it's a first down around the 20? 30? I can't remember. Now let's say we get the ball at the 25 and drive down to the 5 before not getting in (could happen, I know), but what definetely would of happened at that point is we would of taken more time off the clock. The Giants ended up getting the ball back on their twelve yard line with 3:46 and one timeout. Now let's say they get the ball at the twenty yard line with 1:46 seconds and no timeouts...do they still beat us? With our defense the answer is probably, but I like our chances a little better with less time and less timeouts. And who's to say that we don't score when WE get into that redzone after Welker catches the ball (that he dropped)? 

     

     



    Ah, if only wishes were fishes, we'd be up to our arses in haddock. Sorry, can't devine a "possibility" of what COULD have happened. Facts is before and after that drive, only twice did they score TD's on drives. Look at official stats. You'll find "points for" and "points against", but no "Gee, if this hadn't of happened..." category. Why stop with what you'd PROBABKY think the Pats would have done, and add if the Giants defense all got leg cramps withina  3 play sequence,a nd they ended up with their punter playing DB? Or, if a lineman, two LB's, and a safety blew out their knees on the same play? You know, as long as we're playing that Could Possibly Happen Game. Who's to say that Brady was NOT going to toss an INT on an ill conceived pass into strong coverage? or a tipped ball? or a pass the bounced off a receiver? What about a good catch, a step, and then a fumble by the receiver? Where does that figure into your dream like wish?  Naw! That would NEVER happen! Impossible! Couldn't! Right? 

     



    If you really feel this way, why are you bothering posting in this thread, let alone on this forum at all?

    If everything is what it is, and nothing can be done (and therefore discussing it is worthless), why do you even bother posting?

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to RockScully's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

    i wonder why?

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    and yes the ravens got an interception, kaepernick threw it right into ed reed's hands...i could have caught that one.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!




     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     


    Giants fan? Oh I see. That explains EVERYTHING. Thanks for clearing up your agenda. Well, I guess not all opposing fans are as objective as jints.

     

    Have a nice day.

     




    Jints is a useless troll.  The vast majority of his posts consist of reminding us that the Pats didn't win those SBs or trolling Rusty.  He is about as objective as UD6.

     




    I completely disagree! Jints is a genius!

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 98 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????  yes or no

     




     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     



    how hard would it be? it would be easy for them if brady was throwing against them in tight windows, but they were playing against flacco who was playing well.....applauding the ravens defense for their effort is just laughable....did the ravens deserve to win? yes, they outplayed the niners, but on that last drive....i mean cmon, its not hard to stop a receiver from scoring if you are bearhugging him his whole route.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     

     



    how hard would it be? it would be easy for them if brady was throwing against them in tight windows, but they were playing against flacco who was playing well.....applauding the ravens defense for their effort is just laughable....did the ravens deserve to win? yes, they outplayed the niners, but on that last drive....i mean cmon, its not hard to stop a receiver from scoring if you are bearhugging him his whole route.

     




    Flacco didn't score a TD in his last 7 possessions.  His ST sure did though.  His passes were all over the place and his recievers went up and got them.  He also got a big gift when the SFD forgot to touch the guy who got up and scampered to the ez.

    Quit making excuses for the other teams.  Just answer the question, yes or no.

    BTW, if the Pats D didn't blow the lead TWICE in the first Balt game, they wouldn't have even been there.   So you could say the Pats D lost the  SB 15 games earlier.

    Yes or no?

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     

     



    how hard would it be? it would be easy for them if brady was throwing against them in tight windows, but they were playing against flacco who was playing well.....applauding the ravens defense for their effort is just laughable....did the ravens deserve to win? yes, they outplayed the niners, but on that last drive....i mean cmon, its not hard to stop a receiver from scoring if you are bearhugging him his whole route.

     

     




    Flacco didn't score a TD in his last 7 possessions.  His ST sure did though.  His passes were all over the place and his recievers went up and got them.  He also got a big gift when the SFD forgot to touch the guy who got up and scampered to the ez.

     

    Quit making excuses for the other teams.  Just answer the question, yes or no.

    BTW, if the Pats D didn't blow the lead TWICE in the first Balt game, they wouldn't have even been there.   So you could say the Pats D lost the  SB 15 games earlier.

    Yes or no?




    that last sentence is just ignorant because you dont know that the pats would be in the super bowl anyway.

    also, yes they would have won if the defense scored a td, but thats so easy to say in any close game. what is ridiculous is the fact that our offense couldnt score for the final 20 minutes of sb 46 and for the whole second half of the ravens game....and its not like the ravens defense were world beaters out there against the 49ers....kaepernick abused them in the second half. you see, kaepernick is a first year starter, and he showed more balls than brady did, and brady has been in the league since 2000. how can a first year starter be more comfortable in a big game than tom brady?

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     

     



    how hard would it be? it would be easy for them if brady was throwing against them in tight windows, but they were playing against flacco who was playing well.....applauding the ravens defense for their effort is just laughable....did the ravens deserve to win? yes, they outplayed the niners, but on that last drive....i mean cmon, its not hard to stop a receiver from scoring if you are bearhugging him his whole route.

     

     




    Flacco didn't score a TD in his last 7 possessions.  His ST sure did though.  His passes were all over the place and his recievers went up and got them.  He also got a big gift when the SFD forgot to touch the guy who got up and scampered to the ez.

     

    Quit making excuses for the other teams.  Just answer the question, yes or no.

    BTW, if the Pats D didn't blow the lead TWICE in the first Balt game, they wouldn't have even been there.   So you could say the Pats D lost the  SB 15 games earlier.

    Yes or no?

     




    that last sentence is just ignorant because you dont know that the pats would be in the super bowl anyway.

     

    also, yes they would have won if the defense scored a td, but thats so easy to say in any close game. what is ridiculous is the fact that our offense couldnt score for the final 20 minutes of sb 46 and for the whole second half of the ravens game....and its not like the ravens defense were world beaters out there against the 49ers....kaepernick abused them in the second half. you see, kaepernick is a first year starter, and he showed more balls than brady did, and brady has been in the league since 2000. how can a first year starter be more comfortable in a big game than tom brady?




    Flacco and kaepernick both have teams that can cover their azzes when they falter.  They BOTH faltered for a half, flacco in the second and Kap in the first.  What did they both score in those halfs?  6 points?????

    Well guess what TB scored 7 in his half of his SB and nobody had his azz, whereas in the SB years, he always had help.

    Balt would not have won the SB if the D didn't blow TWO, TWO SCORE LEADS in the first game.  There's no guarantee the Pats would have won it but the RAvens sure as he11 wouldn't have.  That's for dam sure. 

    They are the team that knocked them out you know.  Couldn't have done that if they weren't there.  RIGHT?

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxfan94. Show redsoxfan94's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pezz4pats' comment:

     

    In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to pcmIV's comment:

     

    Why the f are people still talking about this game?  Jesus christ it was 2 years ago.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.




    I was comparing it to the SB played the other night.  I was noting how well our D played, holding to 13 points with Edelman at CB, Moore at lead CB, etc, and how impressive that actually was, as they waited for our offense to do anything, even get a FG.

     

    I hadn't seen the highlights put together by NFL Films until yesterday. When seeing the SB Sunday night, with each D being absolutely toasted and each praised by the media, I sytarted the thread. Zolak's on air comments about Welker's catch also mirror my analysis and I have a lot of respect for Zolak's opinions.

    Also, Babe started saying that Welker is a "gimmick" player as a way to deflect from Brady's high, poor throw to the wrong shoulder.

    It's to show how our D didn't lose that SB last year. It wasn't two years ago either. Last year is last year.

    I am VERY proud of how that 2011 D played in SB 46. It would have gone down as one of BB's most masterful coaching jobs, and we know how long that list is.

     

     

     




    agreed, what the pats D did against that powerful giants D to keep it a game, was nothing short of incredible.

     

     



    Yup those zero 3 & outs and Zero 6 & outs and zero turn overs and 5 minutes on the field on average for their 8 possession game was nothing short of miraculous.

     

    So much so that no Defense in the history of the NFL has ever done that before.

    Glad u  & useless liked it.

     

     



    Post Brady's AFC title game stats since 2007.

     

    Thanks.

     




    Don't need to, because I'm sure the sorriest Defense to ever be carried in a NFL championship game, was much much worse.

     

    Did you see the Ravens D get a pick to help their QB get 7?

    Did you see the special teams score 7?  Instead of giving the O one of the worst starting averages in NFL history.

    Did you see the goal-line stand to preserve the narrow lead, after Flacco couldn't score in the second half, and win the game?  Their second half that just happened to have 1 less possession than the Pats O had in the whole F"N SB......  BOTH F"N SB's??????

    That's what a championship D does, they help their O.

    That's what a championship TEAM does, they help each other.

    If you add up all the zero's the Pats D had, you still get zero.

    You seem to be very confused. 

    Flacco didn't win that game, he had a whole lot of help.

    TB didn't lose those games, he had a whole lot of help.

    Would the Pat's have won with a pic and a KR to the house and or a single GL stand?

    Would they??????   Answer the question.  It requires a yes or a no and doesn't require you talking about any pink things or any ones education or job or how much money they make or ball washers. 

    Just answer the question or STFU because if you can't honestly answer that EASY question, you are nothing but a Brady hatin troll.  Case closed!

    Same goes for you, crusty jr.

     




    hmm, you didnt post the stats

     

     

    i wonder why?

    Your BFF already has many times and the stats just support what I just said.

    It's not on one man and if you and your BFF, FB  can't see that then you just can't see anything.

    How many picks did the D get in the SB yrs again?  How many returns to the house?

    How much help did they give TB and the O?

    Where has that been for the past 6 years?  HMMM???

    Answer the question or shut it!  Easy question.  "Would the Pats have won both SB's with a pic or fumble recovery, KR to the house and an ending drive gl stand?"  All they needed was ONE of those.   Flacco got all three.   Total failure!

     




     

     



    yea flacco got an int from his defense because kaepernick threw the ball right to reed, and lamichael james was just begging for that ball to be punched out. as far as jones goes, yes hes a freak and the pats could use a returner like him obviously....but all the pats offense had to do was score ONE td in the final 20 minutes of the game and they would have won, just ONE td in more than a quarter from an offense as dynamic as the pats? that should have been easy. they didnt score, so they lost.

     

     




    Just answer the question?  Would the Pats have won with a fumble recovery, pick, a st return and or a gl stand?  It's not hard.  You can do it.  Yessssssssssss or nooooooooo?

     

    How many points did Flacco score in the WHOLE 7 Possession half?

    How many did TB score in the WHOLE 4 possession half?

    Should have bee MORE easy for FLacco with 3 more tries?  Guess he sucked too.

    Should have been easy for the Pats D to get one flippen t/o, they averaged 3 a game.  1 pick is one play, not 92 yards and 12 plays.  Easy Peazy!

    So, yes or no?

     




    you are literally too dumb to respond to. you just said its easy to force turnovers in a playoff game....little do you know that not every qb is out there forcing throws into tight windows and risking int's all the time like brady does in the playoffs. eli was playing well at the time last year and the defense kept him in check for almost all of the game and kept giving the offense chance after chance after chance to build the lead and they never did. as far as the afc title game this year goes, the offense might as well have stayed in the locker room at halftime, because they did absolutely nothing in the 2nd half

     

     




    UMMMMM.. you just said it was easy to score TD's in a play-off game.  Which is harder a single pick or a 90 yrd TD?  

     

    Flacco's old and tired D got a goal line stop, a pick and a fumble recovery.  How hard could one of those be for a young, totally rebuilt, and exiciting D?  (finger in mouth gagging)

     

      Will you ever answer a question????????/

     

     



    how hard would it be? it would be easy for them if brady was throwing against them in tight windows, but they were playing against flacco who was playing well.....applauding the ravens defense for their effort is just laughable....did the ravens deserve to win? yes, they outplayed the niners, but on that last drive....i mean cmon, its not hard to stop a receiver from scoring if you are bearhugging him his whole route.

     

     




    Flacco didn't score a TD in his last 7 possessions.  His ST sure did though.  His passes were all over the place and his recievers went up and got them.  He also got a big gift when the SFD forgot to touch the guy who got up and scampered to the ez.

     

    Quit making excuses for the other teams.  Just answer the question, yes or no.

    BTW, if the Pats D didn't blow the lead TWICE in the first Balt game, they wouldn't have even been there.   So you could say the Pats D lost the  SB 15 games earlier.

    Yes or no?

     




    that last sentence is just ignorant because you dont know that the pats would be in the super bowl anyway.

     

    also, yes they would have won if the defense scored a td, but thats so easy to say in any close game. what is ridiculous is the fact that our offense couldnt score for the final 20 minutes of sb 46 and for the whole second half of the ravens game....and its not like the ravens defense were world beaters out there against the 49ers....kaepernick abused them in the second half. you see, kaepernick is a first year starter, and he showed more balls than brady did, and brady has been in the league since 2000. how can a first year starter be more comfortable in a big game than tom brady?

     




    Flacco and kaepernick both have teams that can cover their azzes when they falter.  They BOTH faltered for a half, flacco in the second and Kap in the first.  What did they both score in those halfs?  6 points?????

     

    Well guess what TB scored 7 in his half of his SB and nobody had his azz, whereas in the SB years, he always had help.

    Balt would not have won the SB if the D didn't blow TWO, TWO SCORE LEADS in the first game.  There's no guarantee the Pats would have won it but the RAvens sure as he11 wouldn't have.  That's for dam sure. 

    They are the team that knocked them out you know.  Couldn't have done that if they weren't there.  RIGHT?



    the niners covered kaepernick's a.zz by allowing 21 points by halftime?

    and no, the ravens couldnt have knocked them out, but how do you know the pats would have beaten the broncos? you dont.

     

Share