SB 46

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: SB 46

    I believe he said '99/100', but who's counting. I truly believe that when TB saw the safety going to cover, primarily because of the blown coverage by the up man who went to cover Hernandes instead of Welk who was running free and wide open. That forced Tom to throw to his left shoulder, which in turn, had WW to contort his body and compromised his ability to make the catch. Of course he'll say that he should have caught it. He's a proud and disappointed professional and a good guy to boot. The blown coverage and the Gents fortunate abililty to have a safety surveying the field and probably watching TB's eyes made that play much more difficult to execute than people think. My 2 sense.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: SB 46

    Hurl, it's going to get worse. SF have 14 picks this year and they are already deep and stacked. This could be a 3 to 4 year run and I can't really see anyone stopping them except themselves. Let's just hand them 4 Lombardi's and watch their wrath in the near future.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from danemcmenamin. Show danemcmenamin's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to RockScully's comment:

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    Just watched SB 46 highlights:

    To think this D allowed  1 TD in the first half and 2 FGs total in the 2nd half, with the offense not doing anything else after the Hernandez TD, it's stunning that some here still think what we saw yesterday in the SB was better from either D than our own.

    Wilfork just up and down the sideline "saying make em kick FGs, fellas".  Yep.

    NE had the momentum until the Brady INT, and finally the Welker drop.

    "How about a 7 minute drive and end it on out terms." - Tom Brady

    "Ball was high and to the outside. It turned him to the outside." - Analyst, Scott Zolak

     

     

     



    This is absolute BS Rusty, you may be right but it doesn't matter it's been too long ago for you to bring it up now. Put simply putting this up is the behaviour of a troll by definition. I can't believe you put this up over a year after the game. And Rusty what is the purpose of this thread....it's to prove you were right, this is why I think you take more joy in Brady underperforming than the Patriots winning because while everyone here wants them to win including yourself you don't get to say your piece unless they lose and Brady plays bad. See there you win it was all Brady's fault, is that what you want from the forum. Do you want Rusty ball washers?? Man you're so much a troll you don't even realise it anymore, you think you're an avid fan well i'll tell you something, avid fans don't bash the best player on the team at any oppourtunity and avid fans don't hope their team will lose so they can have fun on their forums 

     

     




    I'm a realist. I knew why we wouldn't win a SB as soon as Week 3 in Buffalo last year. And yes, I was right. I am still right.

     

    Me admitting what needs to happen is nothing more than me seeing something you can't see for yourself or don't want to admit.

    Is it possible that you're a little immature, a little too googly eyed over Brady, and don't want to admit that he's actually a huge part of the problem these last 2-3 years in the postseason?

    How many more AFC title games do you need to see?  1? 2?

    Only Brady can make Tom Brady play better in the postseason.

     

     



    Rusty...I opened the post with you may be right as in my admittance to you being right, I don't want to lose another as I said last week i wouldn't care if Brady was told what to do on every play of every series for the rest of career as long as we win. It doesn't change the fact that you're trolling this board coming out with nonsense like this a full calender year later and taking the exact same pleasure in bringing up. Look Rusty if you're an intelligent man ( I don't know you however you constantly commend yourself on your intelligence i've noticed)  then you would have realised long ago that your attempts to change everyones opinions to yours is futile and yet you've continued to do it for 3-4 years. That's called being a troll Rusty, do some reading as you would say and you'd realise what you really are on this forum

     

     



    Me having a consistent opinion that proves to be right, is not me trying to change yours. You have the right to lesser opinion that isn't right.

     

    Personally, I can't believe we're watching this same kind of finesse, lacking offense 5 years removed from its failures in SB 42.

     



    This we agree on, it's been long enough. We need a better defensive backfield though whether you care to believe it or not. When Talib went out this year they were well below par and Flacco carved them up, no other way to put it really. Even if Brady was playin well it would have been tight no doubt in my mind. At the end of the day there has to be a certain level of talent and that back end needs an upgrade.

    Have you ever noticed by the way that it seems to be the non-BB types who make the best WR and CBs you know what i mean the really loud braggy generally bad character guys, makes me wonder if he should take a gamble on someone like that this year against his own theories. Obviously I know next to nothing about football compared to BB but I think he needs to realise that the locker room will do the hard work in bringing guys like that round.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from TripleOG. Show TripleOG's posts

    Re: SB 46

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to GEAUX-TIGRES' comment:

     

    I believe he said '99/100', but who's counting. I truly believe that when TB saw the safety going to cover, primarily because of the blown coverage by the up man who went to cover Hernandes instead of Welk who was running free and wide open. That forced Tom to throw to his left shoulder, which in turn, had WW to contort his body and compromised his ability to make the catch. Of course he'll say that he should have caught it. He's a proud and disappointed professional and a good guy to boot. The blown coverage and the Gents fortunate abililty to have a safety surveying the field and probably watching TB's eyes made that play much more difficult to execute than people think. My 2 sense.

     




    Funny how people pick and choose what quotes are really meant by a player and those  that aren't. LMAO

     

     

    Welker dropped the Lombardi. Just live with it. Brady placed the ball perfectly between 3 defenders and Wes simply...

     

    http://cdn.wegotthiscovered.com/wp-content/uploads/patriots1-articleLarge.jpg

     

    http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/the-huddle/2012/02/07/welkerx-large.jpg




     

    Why cant people admit that Welkers hands has always failed him in the clutch?  He is a chest catcher who clamps on to the ball and he catches 80 % of his balls this way, only when he cant jump high enough to catch with his chest, does he drop these balls with his suspect hands but the proof is there. Go watch a highlight reel and you will see almost no catches with his hands. He is like the kid in the BK commercial who couldnt eat the whopper cuz his hands were too small. God love him but the guy is limited.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: SB 46

    Babe. You have to get a close up of where the ball is, and it's obvious he would have to be Wilt to catch it. Please Google. Neither Welk nor Samuel have catchable balls. These dead horses have been beaten so badly, the buzzards won't come near them.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from GEAUX-TIGRES. Show GEAUX-TIGRES's posts

    Re: SB 46

    'In the numbers'? How many Jacks did you have that day? Just told Babe to see an up close shot of where the ball was. I said Wilt may have had a chance to catch it. Enough said. This is five years ago. This must have ruined your life. I honestly feel sorry for you.

     
Sections
Shortcuts