Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Should Chris Culliver apologize?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to ricky12684's comment:

     

    "your country". So does that me the USA is not your country? are you even American?

     

    BTW, our current socialist administration gives over 20 billion dollars a year in foreign aid to those peaceful muslim loving nations  that are so freindly to us, and gives israel about 3 billion.

    and it's not our country's fault if people don't want to get up off their azzes and get a job. i can understand if they are disabled, but this is the land of opportunity and equality-shouldn't be a problem nowadays to keep themselves from starving 

     

     



    no need to keep this going you're not convincing anyone. when i want your opinion i'll turn on fox news.

    [/QUOTE]

    there's your mistake, the only thing Fox news has is a bunch of hot babes. their news is nobetter than the news from the athesists on MSBNC

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    Unfortunately, MSNBC (and many other news outlets) tends to report factual information. The same can't be said for Fox News. 

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

     I have more knowledge of history than you could ever begin to dream of, kiddie.  You're a religious freak who is also a homophobe. I am not the one with these problems. It's you.

     




    Yes, your historical knowledge has been stellar in this thread.  let's see - you:

     

    1.  Claimed that separation of church and state was constitutionally mandated.  Nope WRONG.

    2.  Made the claim that Jefferson wrote the constitution - nope WRONG.

    3.  Lied about claiming that Jefferson wrote teh constitution and then said the wall of separation of church and state drove founders.  Nope WRONG - state established religions were in place after the constitution was ratified.

    4.  Claimed that Jefferson came up with the wall of separation - nope WRONG

    5.  Claimed that the wall of separation was to "keep Baptists in check" nope WRONG - it was an idea from the Baptist Roger Williams.

    but you have compared people to Hitler, called people Homophobes, and corrected people's grammar. 

    Compelling!

     

     




    You forgot that he says SOCAS means individualscan't vote based on their religious beliefs.

     

    Hitler was gay.

    And persons disagreeing with him are like serial killers.

     




    1. I said you could vote on religious beliefs, but I'd also call you a cuckoo.  The very reason you admit to doing that proves you have no understanding of what the 1st amendment means.

     

    2. Hitler absolutely may have been gay. It was widely speculated at the time.

    3. People are crazy, are proven wrong repeatedly unwilling to accept defeat, will be compared to serial killers, yes.

     

     




    1. Wrong.

     

    2. Wrong.

    3. Wackjob.

     




    1. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

     

    2. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

    3. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

     




    You're supreme goofiness never ceases to amaze junior. You spend page after page after page championing the gay cause....

     

    Then use being gay to try and insult me. HOF stupid!

     

     



    Actually, the joke is on you.  You're the one has an issue with you, yourself being gay. I am not "insulting" you at all. You are who you are.  You just happen to be incredibly annoying.  I welcome diversity, all creeds, ethnicities, etc.

     

     

     




    You are irrevocably dense junior. I have no issues with gays. I just won't act to help them have the right to be married. Let them knock themselves out with their gayness. I've never had sex with a man. But I suspect you may not be able to say the same.

     



    Absolute nonsense, Babe. You're homophobic colors are shining bright.

    You tell us how you have no issues with gays... you simply don't want them to be married for some unfounded reason or another. That's all... right? 

    Wrong.

    In the same breath you use the act of being gay as an insult/personal attack. Anything you've said thus far in this thread has completely lost credibility. 

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    Unfortunately, MSNBC (and many other news outlets) tends to report factual information. The same can't be said for Fox News. 

     




    I doubt any of them have a shred of integrity at all.

     



    Integrity is one thing... reporting factual information is another thing. Integrity can be influenced by how such a news station reports facts, but they aren't synonymous. 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    Unfortunately, MSNBC (and many other news outlets) tends to report factual information. The same can't be said for Fox News. 

     




    I doubt any of them have a shred of integrity at all.

     



    Thank you babe.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:


    You are irrevocably dense junior. I have no issues with gays. I just won't act to help them have the right to be married. Let them knock themselves out with their gayness. I've never had sex with a man. But I suspect you may not be able to say the same.

     




    LOL. Babe thanks for putting that in the proper pespective. On a side note how can any man want to have sex with another man? How does that happen?

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     


    You are irrevocably dense junior. I have no issues with gays. I just won't act to help them have the right to be married. Let them knock themselves out with their gayness. I've never had sex with a man. But I suspect you may not be able to say the same.

     

     




    LOL. Babe thanks for putting that in the proper pespective. On a side note how can any man want to have sex with another man? How does that happen?

     



    Via some kind of developmental oddity during the time that the child is growing the womb. I do wonder if there is some genetic component -- some kind of DNA mutation... not sure.

    Sorta like how some people are incredibly stupid and dense... developmental oddity, genetics, mutation. Who knows!

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

     

    In response to RockScully's comment:

     

     I have more knowledge of history than you could ever begin to dream of, kiddie.  You're a religious freak who is also a homophobe. I am not the one with these problems. It's you.

     




    Yes, your historical knowledge has been stellar in this thread.  let's see - you:

     

    1.  Claimed that separation of church and state was constitutionally mandated.  Nope WRONG.

    2.  Made the claim that Jefferson wrote the constitution - nope WRONG.

    3.  Lied about claiming that Jefferson wrote teh constitution and then said the wall of separation of church and state drove founders.  Nope WRONG - state established religions were in place after the constitution was ratified.

    4.  Claimed that Jefferson came up with the wall of separation - nope WRONG

    5.  Claimed that the wall of separation was to "keep Baptists in check" nope WRONG - it was an idea from the Baptist Roger Williams.

    but you have compared people to Hitler, called people Homophobes, and corrected people's grammar. 

    Compelling!

     

     




    You forgot that he says SOCAS means individualscan't vote based on their religious beliefs.

     

    Hitler was gay.

    And persons disagreeing with him are like serial killers.

     




    1. I said you could vote on religious beliefs, but I'd also call you a cuckoo.  The very reason you admit to doing that proves you have no understanding of what the 1st amendment means.

     

    2. Hitler absolutely may have been gay. It was widely speculated at the time.

    3. People are crazy, are proven wrong repeatedly unwilling to accept defeat, will be compared to serial killers, yes.

     

     




    1. Wrong.

     

    2. Wrong.

    3. Wackjob.

     




    1. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

     

    2. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

    3. Wackjob old man and possibly gay himself with a bible.

     




    You're supreme goofiness never ceases to amaze junior. You spend page after page after page championing the gay cause....

     

    Then use being gay to try and insult me. HOF stupid!

     

     



    Actually, the joke is on you.  You're the one has an issue with you, yourself being gay. I am not "insulting" you at all. You are who you are.  You just happen to be incredibly annoying.  I welcome diversity, all creeds, ethnicities, etc.

     

     

     




    You are irrevocably dense junior. I have no issues with gays. I just won't act to help them have the right to be married. Let them knock themselves out with their gayness. I've never had sex with a man. But I suspect you may not be able to say the same.

     

     



    Absolute nonsense, Babe. You're homophobic colors are shining bright.

     

    You tell us how you have no issues with gays... you simply don't want them to be married for some unfounded reason or another. That's all... right? 

    Wrong.

    In the same breath you use the act of being gay as an insult/personal attack. Anything you've said thus far in this thread has completely lost credibility. 

     




    Spare the masses your bucketloads of BS. Junior accuses me of being gay as an insult while he's a great "defender" of gays and I say the same to him and you accuse me of hypocrisy.

     

    Doesn't get any more head up your rump anal than that chump.

    In case you have been unable to grasp this because of pure denseness; I find homosexual behavior to be immoral. I haven't made that a secret. The extent of my desire to act upon that is to not assist in gay marriage being achieved. Other than that I could care less and wish them peace and prosperity. No, they're not on my most admired people list. Live and let live, but don't expect my assistance in justification.

    But goofballs like you come along and tell me I want something other than that which I have stated. And that makes you a walking talking joke.

     



     

    I didn't see where Rusty said such a thing, but I can tell you right now that I'm not a fan of him.

    And why you find homosexuality immoral is beyond me... 

    Bible, right? I don't suppose you never shave or get a haircut, or that you never swear, right?

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    .

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to dreighver's comment:

    And why you find homosexuality immoral is beyond me... 




    C'mon man, really? What's moral about it?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    And why you find homosexuality immoral is beyond me... 

     




    C'mon man, really? What's moral about it?

     



    What's immoral about it? That's the better question.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to dreighver's comment:

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

     

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    And why you find homosexuality immoral is beyond me... 

     




    C'mon man, really? What's moral about it?

     

     



     

    What's immoral about it? That's the better question.



    It's sick dude. The Russians and the muslims have it right when it comes to that sick act of abomination.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from dreighver. Show dreighver's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

     

    In response to dreighver's comment:

     

    And why you find homosexuality immoral is beyond me... 

     




    C'mon man, really? What's moral about it?

     

     



     

    What's immoral about it? That's the better question.

     



    It's sick dude. The Russians and the muslims have it right when it comes to that sick act of abomination.

     



    And that's simply your opinion.

    A lot of people used to (and still do) think that blacks are the devil incarnate, or that interracial marriage is a sick, abominable act. 

    Just you it's your opinion doesn't make it true.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTS. Show BostonTS's posts

    Re: Should Chris Culliver apologize?

    "I could care less if two consenting adults, who are homosexual, live their lives who they want to live them. It's none of my business telling them how to feel or what to do in their life."

    Rusty been taking issue with you for a long time it seems but I'm gonna pull back here for your strong and well-informed stand on these issues. Well said man. You seriously surprised me, in a good way. Made my day actually. Well done.

    As for Culliver, the niners should keep him away from a mic or any speeches on social issues or any niners PR for that matter. The apology he owew most of all is for his crummy play yesterday...

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts