posted at 12/31/2013 6:40 PM EST
In response to TrueChamp's comment:
Eng, You can't really call my logic off, as I am just stating that the system has worked. We have the most wins in the LG in BBs time as team builder. I pointed out the steelers, ravens, and gints all being former SB winners with the same GM, the same QB and the same coach and they are not even in the playoffs. 2 of them also have HOF QBs like we do. That isnt logic, ot is a fsct.
So for the 3 or 4 guys on this forum who say Brady and cosching are the only reasons we have been so dominate, I say good one. We have had top 5 defenses, top 5 offenses, top 3 passing, top 3 rushing, at all different times in BB's control. You cant have a talented enough team to go to super bowls every other year but then not have any talent because we lost 2 SB's in the last 2 minutes. Backwards thinking. It just doesn't make sense.
And speaking of flawed logic, how can you sit here and possibly criticize the amount of probowlers we have had during BB's reign( which I would guess is the most in the entire nfl) when it is probably as good as it gets. Thats like saying the Rothschild family was the richest family in the world but they could have made more money so they really didn't do too well!!!
You don't think Brady had a little to do with having a top end run game (when D's concentrated on stopping him), and a top end passing game? For the D I agree when we actually spent resources to make it that way. Seymour, Wilfork, Harrison, Washington, Cox all didn't come as value they came from spending resources and all were major players in making it a top 5 D. Where has the D been since 08' when value at CB and along the line were taken instead of spending resources?
btw you failed logic was that value was the only way to go and it works so don't change it while BB himself has changing that logic from time to time essentially saying he was wrong at those times but you don't acknowledge his shifts from value after years in which the value system failed.
Please point out where I said that. What I said is you don't find probowlers as low cost FAs or UDFA's and that the probowlers we did have came from early round draft picks and spending resources aquiring them. I also said it's better to spend a little extra resources to get higher level talent (like probowlers) instead of getting 10 guys and hoping one can be a starter. So where is the flaw in my logic as it turns out the vast majority of our probowlers can from spending that little extra or with higher draft picks.