Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from pats-fan-2007. Show pats-fan-2007's posts

    Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-06-06/super-bowl-prediction-packers-to-repeat-given-the-chance

    Agree on their thoughts that the offense should be even better this year (assuming Mankins plays).

    Just think about it....we had a great offense last year.

    This coming year we get contributions from the likes of:

    1) Eddelman
    2) Price
    3) Tate
    4)Vereen
    5) Ridley

    Not to mention that Hernandez will be healthy. And I'm not even including Cannon and Solder on the OL.

    Scary offense.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from WelkerRules. Show WelkerRules's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    That same article also picked the packers to win that SB. I think NE will play in Indy and not only play but WIN. It is time for the Pats to win another SB.

    Packers won't repeat again. Neither will the Saints.

    Go Pats!
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from JulesWinfield. Show JulesWinfield's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    It never matters who any of these magazines pick...
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from arodrambone. Show arodrambone's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    I freakin wish we had drafted a 4-3 de, even Romeus.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from anonymis. Show anonymis's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    I really don't see why they would be favored. Are they good? yes. Certainly a very good regular season team as of late, but not playoff prime time. They still have a pretty weak pass rush as they've had for the past 3-4 years - and their running game certainly improved vs. the year before - but only because of the TE corp.  It'd be kewl to see them add a back that can gain some tough, short, north-south yardage. They could certainly control the clock a lot better with a premier-type back  all around back that can run AND catch. 

    At times last year, I thought they would move away from predictable play calling (i.e., spread offense in the shotgun), but then it would just creep back in.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    I hope they are wrong. A SB loss is not something I want to see. I also think the Packers will be very good, but I don't see a repeat.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    We can't beat the Packers, we can't touch Aaron Rodgers. Unless we get a pass rusher in her we'll win no rings. 

    I doubt we can beat the Colts, Eagles or Chargers. In fact, I doubt we can beat any elite QB. 
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from digger0862. Show digger0862's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    In Response to Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB:
    We can't beat the Packers, we can't touch Aaron Rodgers. Unless we get a pass rusher in her we'll win no rings.  I doubt we can beat the Colts, Eagles or Chargers. In fact, I doubt we can beat any elite QB. 
    Posted by 49Patriots

    Huh? We beat them all last year. What has changed?
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from NYPat. Show NYPat's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    we can't beat, we can't beat, we can't beat, I am about to start crying.
     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from bluefox70. Show bluefox70's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB



    The Sporting News just lost ALL credibility!!!   The Pats haven't even won a playoff game in 5 years and got smoked by a team that got smoked in the playoffs!

    This is not the old Pats. This team is mediocre at best!
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    A different sporting news article was recently brought up with many suggesting that it was a hack website/magazine.  I wonder if those who hate on the magazine's other article are ready to give it credence now.
     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Paul_K. Show Paul_K's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    Green Bay and New England are pretty much alone and on top of my power ratings, with New England in the lead. 
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from dmcpatsfan. Show dmcpatsfan's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    I love the Patriots but untill they turn it up in the POST season this prediction means absolutly nothing....

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    In Response to Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB:
    We can't beat the Packers, we can't touch Aaron Rodgers. Unless we get a pass rusher in her we'll win no rings.  I doubt we can beat the Colts, Eagles or Chargers. In fact, I doubt we can beat any elite QB. 
    Posted by 49Patriots


    Wake up. You were dreaming. It isn't the early 90's anymore. THis team beat every elite QB they faced last year and that was most of the elite QBs in the league.
     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from apdynasty23. Show apdynasty23's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    Simply put, I'll take Belichick's decision-making over anyone here because it's: Belichick 5 Super Bowls and All of us Combined: ZERO.
     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from garytx. Show garytx's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    In Response to Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB:
    In Response to Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB : Remember the irrational troll level on here last summer and early Fall in preseason when the D looked like it hadn't progressed? bawhaha I was banned for the first time then, I believe.  All because some didn't want to hear logic. The Jets pass rush was no better than NE's last year.  Give me a healthy D Line, sign a FA and continue to develop what you have.  As stated many times, this team's pass rush will come from a group effort as much as it will be a guy like Dwight Freeney or clay Matthews coming off the edge.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing


    Your banter was pretty harsh at times so it didn't surprise me when the ban happened. 

    The troll level was high as well as the "jump off the wagon" crowd.  Belichick was a stooge.  Still is to some here.  What a mess.  I hope it's not as bad this year.

    As far as the rush goes the drafting of Ras-I is suppose to help out.  Chung had to be used more in pass protection and was not able to do a safety blitz.  The opposing offense had fewer people to worry about.  Looking to see how this plays out.  Cunningham is a year wiser too.   
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from digger0862. Show digger0862's posts

    Re: Sporting News Picks Pats for SB

    The whole defense is a year wiser. Belichick must be getting anxious to teach his young guys more of his defensive schemes.
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share