Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Artist-Frmrly-Knwn-As-NickC1188. Show Artist-Frmrly-Knwn-As-NickC1188's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    UD6....I feel your pain on the colts season. about Jbolt not surprised he was awol after that loss he and Jints are two peas in pod... a couple of frontrunners.
    Posted by Harleyroadking-11


    true - i can live with constantly debating the meaning of pass interference and I've always respected UD(6) for taking it and dishing it right back.  Jints and PhllyPhn and JBolt all
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from jbolted. Show jbolted's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Statements by Tex, that I agree with:

    The Colts without Manning are the worst team in the league.

    The Colts' OL is mediocre at best.

    DEs Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis are on the down-sides of their careers, as are TE Dallas Clark, and WR Reggie Wayne.

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Hey jbolt don't step too far out on that limb to agree with tex. 

    The only thing that may be incorrect is that the colts are worst without manning, but if true that truly does make manning probably the best ever.  I could care less about rings if what tp says is true. 

    oline has been mediocre at best for about 4 years. 

    At the age of 30 yrs + for freeney and mathis and to quote mellencamp once again -

    there's less days in front of the horse Than riding in the back of this cart.

    They are definitely getting older but they are currently still very good.
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Really tex, really?  I have no idea what you are talking about.  I guess this is just another effort of yours to be civil, right?

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from teegee. Show teegee's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    The Colts should win this one. That's why they keep a loser like Caldwell around. The only people that would stick up for him are the Colts fans themselves.
    Posted by Rerun85

    No, they shouldn't, game is at Tampa.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes : No, they shouldn't, game is at Tampa.

    Posted by teegee

    I agree, this is the first prime time TV game for the Bucs in years, and their first sellout in almost as long.  They'll be plenty motivated.  Moreover, they have more talent than Indy especially at QB.

    Don't rule out the Rams for the #1 pick.  They wouldn't take Luck but they'd sure get a king's ransom for the pick, and they're suitably inept.  I still favor KC though.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from nZone. Show nZone's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Andrew Luck is the next David Carr.  Good Luck!
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
         Colts and Dolphins appear to be the main contestants in the "Suck for Luck"  sweepstakes....     
    Posted by TexasPat3


    Luck is still a junior and to my knowledge he hasn't declared he's leaving Stanford.  I'd like to see one of those teams tank their season and "win" the first pick only to have Luck decide to go back to school.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from natesubs. Show natesubs's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    let's say i am the Kansas City GM and they do end up with the #1 pick, i would trade the pick being that i have cassel who performed really well last season and this season he is without all of his top weapons and has a terrible OL.  you could easily get two-first round picks and 2 second round picks and maybe a 3rd for the best QB to come out of the draft in the past 5 years.  (see julio jones trade up) they could reload on OL/DE/OLB/C/S/RB all for the price of a QB who could be better than the proven guy you have.  (leaf was supposed to be good, so was Carr, so was jamarcus russell) plus next season they will recieve all of their top offensive weapons back from IR next season. 
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from p-mike. Show p-mike's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    The more I watch them play, the more I am convinced that Minnesota is determined to suck beyond all previously plumbed depths of sucking.

    Oh . . .  and nate, if you really think anybody is going to go all Mike Ditka to get Andrew Luck -- trading their entire draft for a guy who might or might not be able to play in the NFL -- I would suggest you level the dosage a little bit. More power to whoever gets the pick if they can pull of such a stunt . . .  I just don't see it happening.



     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from jbolted. Show jbolted's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes :      I could see that happening, if KC were to get the #1 pick. We'll soon see if this is a realistic scenario, as the Chiefs go  to Indy to play the Manning-less Colts, this Sunday. Needless to say, this will be a huge game in the "Suck for Luck" sweepstakes. 
    Posted by TexasPat3


    Time to burst the bubble, Cassel sucks. He'll never have playoff success of any shape, form, or fashion. 

    Have you noticed how the Clots have been in every game and then manage to choke right at the end EVERY week (except for opening day @HOU, which was handwritting on the wall time)? Peyton is NOT hurt, it's a shame. Why is #18 in the coaches box, instead of down on the field? Because, he knows Painter won't be there next year, Luck will be. Out of the kindness of his heart, old horseface doesn't want to give Painter false affirmations, so he's avoiding the issue altogether -with Irsay's approval- in the coaches box, not down on the field, like every other non-arrogant QB would do. THE COLTS WILL NOT WIN A GAME UNTIL EVERYBODY ELSE DOES, period. 
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from p-mike. Show p-mike's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes : Time to burst the bubble, Cassel sucks. He'll never have playoff success of any shape, form, or fashion.  Have you noticed how the Clots have been in every game and then manage to choke right at the end EVERY week (except for opening day @HOU, which was handwritting on the wall time)? Peyton is NOT hurt, it's a shame. Why is #18 in the coaches box, instead of down on the field? Because, he knows Painter won't there next year, Luck will be. Out of the kindness of his heart, old horseface doesn't want to give Painter false affirmations, so he's avoiding the issue altogether -with Irsay's approval- in the coaches box, not down on the field, like every other non-arrogant QB would do. THE COLTS WILL NOT WIN A GAME UNTIL EVERYBODY ELSE DOES, period. 
    Posted by jbolted


    I like this post.

    Given the reactionary nature of some (many?) people on this board, and the persitent presence of the once-and-future underdogg(gggg), I'm surprised this thread has turned into a full-fledged "The Fix Is In For The Colts" thread.

    I'm not really sure how the NFL determines who sucks more if there isn't one, clear worst record, but I can guarantee you this right now: If this thing comes down to some kind of coin-flip situation, the Colts are going to win it.



     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from jbolted. Show jbolted's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes : I like this post. Given the reactionary nature of some (many?) people on this board, and the persitent presence of the once-and-future underdogg(gggg), I'm surprised this thread has turned into a full-fledged "The Fix Is In For The Colts" thread. I'm not really sure how the NFL determines who sucks more if there isn't one, clear worst record, but I can guarantee you this right now: If this thing comes down to some kind of coin-flip situation, the Colts are going to win it.
    Posted by p-mike

    How come we're not getting major media updates on Peyton's supposed next injury? Because he doesn't have one. We knew he didn't have a spine, it's kinda ironic that the Clots chose the neck as his culprit, and not the lacking backbone. BTW I'm thoroughly disappointed in TEX for not including a poll in this thread.  
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    If my Mom named me Sage, she would be off my Xmas list.
     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from shenanigan. Show shenanigan's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    You have an unhealthy obsession with the Colts. They blow this year so can we just enjoy not having to hear about them and Manning for once in the last 15 years. Eventually all the king horses and all the kings men will put Gomer back together again and then we can all get back to talking about the Colts, Polian, and Brady vs Manning. As for Luck, until he does something in the NFL he is just another overhyped prospect in a long line of them who were going to change the league (Reggie Bush?). I don't care who gets him, he doesn't guarantee future success to any team.
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Lucks a junior isnt he? last year he didnt declare cause he knew the panthers would have the first pick. Maybe he wouldnt want to play for the clots and come back for his sr year. Its not like it'll effect his salary. One year cause the wage scale. He will wait till the end of the season and see where he could go. That shoud be decided by dec. He's going to have to be the savior like Newton is being. Might aswell go where you want to play.
     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Artist-Frmrly-Knwn-As-NickC1188. Show Artist-Frmrly-Knwn-As-NickC1188's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:
         Dolphins are coming on strong in the "Suck for Luck" sweepstakes. They could challenge the Colts and the Rams for the league's worst record: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/07/searching-for-hope-in-miami/
    Posted by TexasPat3


    I'd like to see Luck out of the division

    I haven't seen too much spectacular from him, but just in case.  I think he'd be great in Minnesota with Harvin and Peterson.

    I also think a healthy Moaeki, Bowe, and a healthy Jamaal Charles would be a good fit for him in Kansas City, but they won a game.  Maybe they'll lose to the Colts this week...
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Thesemenarecowards. Show Thesemenarecowards's posts

    Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes

    Big showdown this weekend between KC and Indy.

    I say it comes down to MINN vs. MIA.  Those teams both play in tough divisions, where as KC gets DEN twice.  Maybe Denver is dark horse.... Luck hands off to Tebow.

    I couple people mentioned Cinci?  They already have 2 wins and a pretty light schedule, I'd be surprised if they don't win at least 6. 
     
Sections
Shortcuts