ok guys.
colts confirmed for #1 pick
chances they dont use the pick?
don't need the colts having 2 full 12' draft picks and maybe even a 2nd 2013
rather have them take anyone including luck than make out like this.
Suck for Luck Sweepstakes
-
Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes
posted at 11/17/2011 6:40 AM EST
- bredbru
- Posts: 12461
- First: 2/11/2011
- Last: 4/23/2013
-
Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes
posted at 11/17/2011 6:41 AM EST
- bredbru
- Posts: 12461
- First: 2/11/2011
- Last: 4/23/2013
In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes : Let the Colts get him. They still won't win. They have to get rid of Caldwell and the Polians in order to properly rebuild.
Posted by TexasPat3yes im taking my consolation in this -
Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes
posted at 11/17/2011 7:54 AM EST
- Davedsone
- Posts: 4361
- First: 8/9/2008
- Last: 5/16/2013
In Response to Re: Suck for Luck Sweepstakes:Hi folks, Forgive Q, he's had a few too many pops today and all of the sudden is showing his manhood by opening his mouth AFTER a colts loss. Q, if you want to be a real man (since this seems to be topic you like to discuss), then admit what is being proven - that Manning isn't only the best QB of his time, but ever.
Posted by UD6Stop talking crazy. Hardware alone says NO. Not as good as Montana. Not as good as Brady. Not as good as Aikman. Not even as good as Roethlisberger. Seems all he got was ONE championship. If that is because the team couldn't afford better talent, THAT is also his fault. As time washes away some of the gaudy stats, he will fade.Unfortunately for the Clots, you can't turn losing on and off. Suck for Luck will become Suck With Luck. Peyton will attempt to play next year and not be able to do it. Luck will take over. The Clots will end Manning's tenure the worst possible way, and continue with Luck in the worst possible way. Bad team, decent run, now over. Buh-bye, CLOTS.