Tate Group

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Tate Group

    why is it that all these players with the last name Tate(Golden&Ben) are all amazing players and are all linked to the pats? i say we draft both of them to have the Terror Tate Trio. 2 at WR and 1 at RB, theres a reason why we drafted Brandon, and thats to have an army of Tates

    GO TATES!!!!!
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsNut5480. Show PatsNut5480's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    I assume your last name is TATE?
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Pats7393. Show Pats7393's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    I agree both would help the o, I'm more on selecting B. Tate than G. Tate.  I think for value where Golden needs to be picked there are a couple of other players Andre Roberts who fill the same role and use the 1st round on a DE or OLB rather than G Tate.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    not sold on golden-why waste a pick on a short WR, but i am sold on brandon
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1r3d12. Show m1r3d12's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    not sold on golden-why waste a pick on a short WR, but i am sold on brandon
    Posted by kansaspatriot


    Yeah, like Welker?
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    In Response to Re: Tate Group : Yeah, like Welker?
    Posted by m1r3d12


    that's what i mean we already have two slot receivers, welker and edelman
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    not sold on golden-why waste a pick on a short WR, but i am sold on brandon
    Posted by kansaspatriot


    You're sold on Brandon who has minimal experience at the WR position but not on Golden who was dominant for the last two years with defenses scheming to stop him?
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from ben-umass. Show ben-umass's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    Desean Jackson is not a tall reciever, and thats worked out pretty good for Philly
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking103. Show harleyroadking103's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    Here are some numbers that I just want to throw out there.....
    games played~192
    receptions~557
    yards~6366
    tds~31
    rushing att.~29 for 178 yards
    punt returns~252 for 2625 yards 3tds
    kickoff ret. 87 for 1862 yards
    3 interceptions
    12 fumble recoveries 1td

    career numbers for a relatively short wide reciever.....5' 10" Troy Brown
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    Here are some numbers that I just want to throw out there..... games played~192 receptions~557 yards~6366 tds~31 rushing att.~29 for 178 yards punt returns~252 for 2625 yards 3tds kickoff ret. 87 for 1862 yards 3 interceptions 12 fumble recoveries 1td career numbers for a relatively short wide reciever.....5' 10" Troy Brown
    Posted by harleyroadking103


    what can one say, troy brown was a phenom. i think tate is ovverrated. shipley from texas would be better
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from akius. Show akius's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    Guys what was the reason why we got our hyines handed to us by all grade A teams last season???
    Lack of Pass Rush.
    and we have to have to use the first round pick to fill that spot, if we can't do that get ready for a repeat.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking103. Show harleyroadking103's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    kansas~ you are right on about TB and Shipley, I confess I know little about Tate.
    I would be happy to see the Pats draft Shipley.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    But think about the confusion that can occure when the defense huddles up and the D captain says ok you cover Tate and I want you to cover Tate and I want you to watch Tate and if he swings out then you cover Tate
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from harleyroadking103. Show harleyroadking103's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    they would have really consenTATE because that TATEnt easy
     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    I assume your last name is TATE?
    Posted by PatsNut5480

    no its Thompson, but it does start with a T lol (X
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    I agree both would help the o, I'm more on selecting B. Tate than G. Tate.  I think for value where Golden needs to be picked there are a couple of other players Andre Roberts who fill the same role and use the 1st round on a DE or OLB rather than G Tate.
    Posted by Pats7393

    True, i could see us taking him with our 2nd second round pick if we move up for him, he should be gone by early to mid second, and with ben tate rising we could probably get him with our 3rd second round pick, if hes there
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    not sold on golden-why waste a pick on a short WR, but i am sold on brandon
    Posted by kansaspatriot

    its not a waste, he was an amazing vertical and blazing speed to burn anyone on the defensive sign
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    kansas~ you are right on about TB and Shipley, I confess I know little about Tate. I would be happy to see the Pats draft Shipley.
    Posted by harleyroadking103

    Shipley would be another Welker clone, Tate is Shipley with more speedy quickness
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    In Response to Re: Tate Group : Shipley would be another Welker clone, Tate is Shipley with more speedy quickness
    Posted by TateGroup


    I don't see BB picking a domer, but i can see KC picking him up, i'm sure wiess would love to have him
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Low-FB-IQ. Show Low-FB-IQ's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    In Response to Re: Tate Group : that's what i mean we already have two slot receivers, welker and edelman
    Posted by kansaspatriot


    yeah like steve smith, deion branch, tory holt, lee evans, derrick mason, etc.


     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from NoBS14. Show NoBS14's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    interested to see what Brandon Tate will do this coming season, since a lot of you are hyping him up.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from patsfaninsatx. Show patsfaninsatx's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    Golden Tate is a stud and to say that Brandon Tate is better would be an incomplete assesment.  If I was to choose between the two I would choose Golden Tate without hesitation.  I seen him play this past year and I was very impressed with him.  He his strong, physical, good hands and fast.  He will be a great NFL player.  Mark my words.  Brandon Tate needs to stay healthy then we can talk about how good he is.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsNut5480. Show PatsNut5480's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    not sold on golden-why waste a pick on a short WR, but i am sold on brandon
    Posted by kansaspatriot


    Golden is 5'11 and Brandon is 6'0.  Not much difference there.  Why are you sold on Brandon?  Golden has better college stats than Brandon did and he did it in a pro style offense.  Golden looks to be a bit more physical also.  Brandon barely got a few touches last season and you're sold on him?  I'm not saying Brandon is a bum he does have potential to be a really good receiver.  Both Tates could be very good receivers in the NFL and selecting Golden would not be a waste.  He has a pretty good college resume.  Oh and he did it under Charlie Weis.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from TateGroup. Show TateGroup's posts

    Re: Tate Group

    In Response to Re: Tate Group:
    In Response to Re: Tate Group : I don't see BB picking a domer, but i can see KC picking him up, i'm sure wiess would love to have him
    Posted by kansaspatriot

    good point, i could see KC taking them with there 2nd round pick being that its the 4th pick of the second round, but u never know, hes played in our type of offence and had great succsess if BB sees a chance at him i think he'll take him
     
Sections
Shortcuts