Re: The search for the Holy Grail.
posted at 2/11/2013 4:15 PM EST
In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:
In response to 42AND46's comment:
In response to BabeParilli's comment:
In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:
In response to BabeParilli's comment:
In response to pezz4pats' comment:
Not much talent?
Here is where their starters in the secondary have been picked since 2007:
Merriweather #24
Chung #34
Butler #41
McCourty #27
And you wonder why people call people like yourself, irrational?
Do trolls and irrationals ever make sense? It'd be fine if their premise actually had somethinig remotely normal behind it, but there never is anything.
^^^^^^ Nothing but a LIAR and an IDIOT. Proof positive right there.
This twerp tries to lie his way out of it every time when people call him out on saying these suckball players are good. Here he touts 4 stiffs who are suspect to downright bust draft picks. LMAO@Rustytroll
Good find Pezz!
How is anything that was written "a lie"? lol
All of those players were picked right where they were slotted to go in those drafts. In those drafts, those players represented talented NCAA prospects. Some were average here, one was a bust and one is a very good young player after being All Pro as a rookie in 2010.
This is what I mean. You're all irrational. You will do anything to find the NCAA prospect on D who didn't morph into Deion Sanders, Mike Haynes or Ed Reed to mask Brady's awful postseason performances since 2007. You lost. Pretending BB needed to draft future HOF players with every pick to replace the borderline HOF caliber players he lost is irrational.
Not every draft pick is going to be a star.
We've been over this. PCMIV posted Ozzie Newsome's picks in recent years for context and its as bad or worse as BB's yields.
It's embarrassing that a small few here think they're a better coach or GM than BB. Take your middle aged and elderly anger to a community center and take up cannasta or something.
You tout these stiffs as talent junior. That's lying because their talent sucks since three of them were/will not retained within their rookie contract and the other is a very suspect 1st round pick.
"Not much talent?
Merriweather #24
Chung #34
Butler #41
McCourty #27"
You can't even admit your spin when you're caught red handed.
remember babe: mccourty is better than revis!
McCourty was All Pro in 2010. Revis was not. So, yes his rookie year blew away Revis's.
Add in what their contracts are and I'll take McCourty all day, everyday moving forward.
But, I never said a first year player was better than any player who had already put in a few seasons, so you lying won't work.
Note how trolls say I said that. Liars never win.
Queenie, you are pathetic! McCourty was NEVER an All-Pro, just like Greene was not drafted in the second round, as you claimed yesterday. STOP LYING. The only legitimate All-Pro rating is PFWA. The others are not recognized. Just like the Pro-bowl.
And if anyone needed any more proof of what a fool you are, here it is. " I'll take McCourty all day" over Revis. And what will you get? The same thing you've had since McCourty was drafted. A bottom 5 pass defense.
