Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.
posted at 7/24/2012 12:58 PM EDT
In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.
[QUOTE]What do you call someone like Babe who posts this repetitive drivel, gets owned by others with stats and facts and still argues his point even though he is wrong and has been proven wrong time and time again? Insane. Insanity is doing something over and over again expecting a different result. The 2012 season can't get here soon enough.
Posted by DoNotSleepOnThePats[/QUOTE]
Where is he wrong? When was he proven wrong?
He wasn't and can't be because everything he lists is the truth.
However where he does go wrong, is his failure to list Brady's short comings as a result of trying to defend him. It's unfortunate it's come to that, but it has.
Babes tactics are not uncommon in here.
You have poster's thinking the Pat's should run more to become diverse. That's an understandable premise and they often present facts to back it up. The problem is they see that as the only problem and scoff at other ideas, not unlike Babe.
Then you have the all out antagonist who think Brady is the devil's spawn. Again they CAN present what they feel are relevant facts but dispute and insult all others. They also make up crap to support their premise. As as result, folks can either ignore it or dispute it.
Why is this any different than what you accuse Babe of? (cept I don't think he makes up stuff)
Time and time again they are given facts to refute what they insist is the cause for the fall of Rome, even though it hasn't fallen. It's merely faltered.
So any one calling out Babe at this point, really should examine their own self.
Can you be antagonistic or insulting or unyielding or defensive or are you trying to prove a point? If so, you are no different than the person you scorn.
My self included.
Isn't that usually the way it is?