The Super Bowl for Dummies.

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hetchinspete. Show Hetchinspete's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:

    Posted by TFB12


    You win the best post of all-time award!!

    Hetch
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from antibody. Show antibody's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies. : If only we could. But we still have dummies that don't understand what transpired.
    Posted by BabeParilli


    What transpired?

    The Giants won.

    The Patriots lost.

    You'd have to be pretty dumb not to understand that.

    Oh, yeah. It's Babe.
     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In response to "Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.":
    BEST THREAD EVER! Had this thread up sportin' these 4 beautiful grey horizontal page breaks...nice.  Groomed my cat who hopped up on me, and threw it down funny in a few spots on here afterwards- Babe, babe...Babe-  I was absolutely wrong about you.  This was a series of very pleasing looking posts.  Easily, your most positive and openly productive ideas that I've ever seen forwarded...  Never thought'cha had it in you.  Thank you, I've never gotten more from you-   This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium
    I see about 20 of these a thread, I actually don't even notice anymore.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Pats-bilbo. Show Pats-bilbo's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    I am so confused by the conflict between you two. Frankly I don't care about it. My life is the same either way. However have either of you considered that you are both right. Our offense could have done better and our defense could have done better. What you are arguing about is whether or not the defense is 60% to blame or the offense is 60% to blame.

    There is no doubt about it, we need a deep threat and running game to make defenses worry about more things and not sit on a short-middle passing game. With these are offense is better.

    There is no doubt we need a few playmakers and more pressure from our defense. Other than Sterling Moore's amazing swat, when has our defense stepped up in a key game to help us win?

    I remember that when the game was on the line, Rodney, Law, McGinnis, Bruschi or Seymour would make a play and help seal a win. Brown or Branch would make a Catch and Vinitari would kick the game winner. With a running game and deeper threats the offense can easily get back this attitude and ability, they are not far off.

    With Jones, Bequette and Hightower we should get more pressure and hopefully with better safety play the cornerbacks start making some plays on the ball. They need to stop worrying about giving up the big play and try making a play once in a while. Is this coaching or ability?

    By why use common sense in this argument? If you are half the "expert" you claim to be then you know that football is a team game and it is difficult to win if you don't have both a play making defense and offense. You need both, one of these alone gets you far and maybe luckily win a Superbowl, but to be dominant in the Playoffs you need both and we need work on both sides of the ball

    I think we have made strides in the off season to address both sides of the ball and am so stroked and excited to see this team come together and believe that they can be a top performer, better than last year. This gives them a real shot at the superbowl and I want to see them go for it. They have a much better chance of winning the next superbowl then they do about beating the giants in last year's superbowl or the one from a few years ago..... Can we at least agree on that?
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    BEST THREAD EVER! Had this thread up sportin' these 4 beautiful grey horizontal page breaks...nice.  Groomed my cat who hopped up on me, and threw it down funny in a few spots on here afterwards- Babe, babe...Babe-  I was absolutely wrong about you.  This was a series of very pleasing looking posts.  Easily, your most positive and openly productive ideas that I've ever seen forwarded...  Never thought'cha had it in you.  Thank you, I've never gotten more from you-   This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli This post is hidden because you are ignoring BabeParilli Stop Ignoring BabeParilli
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium

    The best part is I can knock booob without even having to read his tripe, welcome back to sanity Laz... well kind of.



     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from DoNotSleepOnThePats. Show DoNotSleepOnThePats's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    What do you call someone like Babe who posts this repetitive drivel, gets owned by others with stats and facts and still argues his point even though he is wrong and has been proven wrong time and time again?  Insane.  Insanity is doing something over and over again expecting a different result.

    The 2012 season can't get here soon enough.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    No lazzie. Just because
    Posted by BabeParilli


    Babe, why are you responding to Laz? He already mentioned he has you on ignore so he isn't going to see anything you say.
     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from shenanigan. Show shenanigan's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    There was a time when this forum discussed more than the Patriots run vs pass percentages. Over the past year or so it's enveloped 90% of discussions here. I participated for the first 6 months or so but I don't know how anyone has the energy left to keep rehashing the same old stuff. I can say one thing though- nobody won, no minds were changed and they never will be. I'm ready for football season so something can maybe change the subject.
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from antibody. Show antibody's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies. : Brilliant observations. Post more great stuff like this.
    Posted by BabeParilli


    Hey, I dumbed things down for you and you still don't understand. Not surprised.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    What do you call someone like Babe who posts this repetitive drivel, gets owned by others with stats and facts and still argues his point even though he is wrong and has been proven wrong time and time again?  Insane.  Insanity is doing something over and over again expecting a different result. The 2012 season can't get here soon enough.
    Posted by DoNotSleepOnThePats


    Where is he wrong?  When was he proven wrong? 
    He wasn't and can't be because everything he lists is the truth.

    However where he does go wrong, is his failure to list Brady's short comings as a result of trying to defend him.  It's unfortunate it's come to that, but it has.
    Babes tactics are not uncommon in here.
    You have poster's thinking the Pat's should run more to become diverse.  That's an understandable premise and they often present facts to back it up.  The problem is they see that as the only problem and scoff at other ideas, not unlike Babe.
    Then you have the all out antagonist who think Brady is the devil's spawn.  Again they CAN present what they feel are relevant facts but dispute and insult all others.  They also make up crap to support their premise.  As as result, folks can either ignore it or dispute it. 
    Why is this any different than what you accuse Babe of?  (cept I don't think he makes up stuff) 
    Time and time again they are given facts to refute what they insist is the cause for the fall of Rome, even though it hasn't fallen.  It's merely faltered.
    So any one calling out Babe at this point, really should examine their own self.
    Can you be antagonistic or insulting or unyielding or defensive or are you trying to prove a point?  If so, you are no different than the person you scorn.
    My self included.
    Isn't that usually the way it is?
     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from antibody. Show antibody's posts

    Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.

    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies.:
    In Response to Re: The Super Bowl for Dummies. : Right. keep up the good work stooge.
    Posted by BabeParilli


    Tongue Out
    Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.
     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts