Re: Vereen's Reward
posted at 1/21/2013 5:09 PM EST
In response to tcal2-'s comment:
In response to Low-FB-IQ's comment:
In response to NoMorePensionLooting's comment:
Sounds great! Ahh....except one minor detail...we were flat out stinkin' up da joint....
It was a ONE posession game at the time. Ridley had four carries on that drive before being knocked out two of them were for than 7 yards each. One for 8 yards and one for 9 yards. ...or 4 carries for 4.75 yards per carry on the drive.
What game do people watch. Holy Cow.
Well if that's ture then his previous 16 rushes went for a total of 41 yards or 2.56 per carry. Holy Cow, that's the game I was watching.
Then you would have been chasing your tail and it falls in line with exactly how you respond on this board.
I frankly was never sure if you were doing schtik and being funny or not cause you flip flop more than anyone on here. You love a guy one week, hate him and he's the biggest bum around the next. I mean you "always" do this but I just thought it was you being funny.
If you are serious I have no words.
That is not how you coach. The running game is not one man and there is never a reason to think your 2nd back would fare any better than your top back if you are going to continue the same game plan. Especially if you have different packages for each back and it's outside the gameplan you want to stick to. You do not panic and make whole sale changes when you are within one possession.
Ridley only had 1 other possession in the 2nd half, again for 5 yards.
in the 2nd quarter Ridley 6 for 27 yards. 4.5 yards per carry. I did not do the 1st quater but I will make an assumption and say the 1st quarter was the weakest.
That would mean he got stronger as the game went on and exactly why you stick with a game plan. So exactly what game where you watching?