Vernon Gholston UPDATE

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from LawDawg94. Show LawDawg94's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE : I don't know what the point of that is.  A 9-2 team is just that.  The fact that they didn't beat the Ravens or the Packers is secondary.  Both games were one play away from winning with a minute reamaining.  It didn't happen, so what?  Beating teams that have a lower combined win total can not be considered a negative in any way, regardless of how or by how much.  However, losing big to a bad team can.  A much better assesment is the win percentages of the teams you have lost to, not the teams you beat.  This is very basic stuff. 
    Posted by PhatRex[/QUOTE]


    Rex, you're contradicting yourself in every post...  The Pats is 9-2 also.  You guys laid an EGG vs Packers (9-0), so it was like 2 plays away really.    Please elaborate on just how it would be a better assessment to use the win % of the teams you've lost to...  The 9 wins Pats have provides a more body of work to judge their overall play then to use the 2 losses.  This is very basic don't you think?  Of all the common opponents we've beaten so far, we've beaten them in a far more dominating fashion on Offense.  Sure we didn't play well for 2.5 qtrs yesterday, but we got in sync after having very little time to prepare for the game.  Jets on the other hand had 2 wks to prep for GB and laid an EGG.  If you're saying 9-2 is 9-2, then it's irrelevant how bad Pats' D is playing, because the standing isn't based on defensive stats.  Jets are in a position to win every week, but so are they for losing.  You still have to play the game no matter how bad the other team appears to be.  The Pats learned their lessons along the way.  We changed our offensive philosophy by trading Moss and since we were humbled by Browns we've been playing mistake free football.  Did your parents not give you any pat on the back growing up, so you don't know how to just compliment other teams' success?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Gulo. Show Gulo's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    I KILL FAT PEOPLE
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    In Response to Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE:
    [QUOTE]And the Pats put a 45 spot on the Lions a team you barely beat and needed the Lions to screw up to help you.
    Posted by harleyroadking1[/QUOTE]

    hahahahahahahah

    The Pats looked WAY better beating a Bengal's team opening night (that felt they were playoff bound this seasonand was actually playing for something) than the Jets looked sqeaking by the Lions.

    Then the Pats looked far better crushing those fiesty Lions in the 2nd half yesterday than the Jets looked letting a season team whose season is over hang around into the 3rd quarter.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatFanInBA2. Show PatFanInBA2's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Hey Fat Rex..if you are so enamored by the Jets and confident, why are you spending so much time on OUR boards?



     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from mojobag101. Show mojobag101's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Man, I was ONE yr old the last time the Jets won a SB..............Sad!!!!!!!
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from SilverSun. Show SilverSun's posts

    Re: Vernon Gholston UPDATE

    Phatty, we are going to give Rex the Mouth and all the Jesters a BEAT DOWN real soon.  Get your excuses ready and....... LET'S PARTY!!
     

Share