Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rocky. Show Rocky's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Don't forget Bralon and Patsman3. Bralon is a Giants fan, apparently, and has 2500 posts in 16 months. Pretty hard to racthet up that many posts as a Giants fan on a Pats board. LMAO
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    Too many personalities.....I forgot!  Hard to keep up with a person with personality disorder.....They are constantly going back if forth between their different personalities
     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : No. We want you to define the term and explain where Haynesworth was convicted of "sexual assault".  "On trial"? How about, let's wait to see if there is even any shred of evidence that makes that claim legit. If we wanted to look it up, we would. We already know what the term means. You don't. That's what WE know. This was like when Moss was supposedly abusing his gf the week before the SB. It was compeletely made up. Only YOU would imply that Haynesworth tried to partially paralyze someone by speeding, and then compare that to a decade long+ hobby of kicking back with your buddies torturing dogs in your free time. Yes, those are equivalents!  lol Only YOU would compare Mike Vick's felony interstate crimes to a car accident from speeding, or an on-field incident that any number of former or current NFL players could be guilty of. The only one who has some issues here is you, Phat Rex/Patsman3. You are what Jeffrey Dahmer was before the internets.  Lonely, lost, bittern, angry and likely into little boys and torturing animals. Consdiering you defend the torture of animals, you must be a Dahmer fan.  lol You live with mommy, create names here and probably have your own gay porn collection you can't get enough of. Seek help. It's not too late.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    You sure do use the "We" alot.  Thanks for confirming the multiple personality disorder. 

    I truly do love the world you live in.  I said Vick was wrong, should be out of the league and in your world that's "defending" him.  You make me laugh so hard its not funny.
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    So far, what I'm gathering is that- Vick's actions were O.k. because any of the following:

    Dog torture is better than child molestation and/or rape.

    Phillyfan likes to run over chipmunks on the road, and/or he doesn't actually trully "like" to run them over, but he does anyway...And he's not 1 bit sorry.  So neither should be Vick.

    Electrocuting dogs is sorta like going 5 miles over the legal speed limit at times:  We all do it, right?

    The Philadelphia Eagle Fan thinks that The Pats Fans have a biased agenda against The Eagles own, Michael Vick.

    You can kill and/or torture animals, but not humans.  This includes chipmunks, and even though I forget the correct moral stance on pigeons, Humans are included too, IF they're on motorcycles riding side by side down a road.

    They do c#ck fighting in Mexico, and it's not about the torture or animal cruelty, It's about Gambling...  In otherwords, Hanging dieing dogs by nylon cords/body-slamming losing dogs on the ground & hitting them with a shovel=A-O.k..  Largely this is because there was money riding on the prior action, and because South Carolina is a culture somewhere in that "grey" area between Mexico and The United States.

    "Leave Michael Vick ALONE!!! Because he is Awesome (I hope he sees this phone cam pic of me)." 


    I believe there was another... Oh:  Dogfighting/torture=Keepin' the poor black man from the South, down.  Everyone who's ANYone has pitbulls.  They sorta WANNA fight each other, ya know?  And so, you can let'm tear at each other for a bit, and if they're on leashes and you refer to it as "bumping", then Michael Vick=Sportsman of the year <also, you can do the same w/ your child as a pedophile...IF you call it "bumping", and IF you're a certain color/creed/ and or reside somewhere but not limited too, East of Shianne, South of Nashville, West of Biloxy, and North of Jacksonville (but not including Jacksonville itself).  
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from PhllyPhn1967. Show PhllyPhn1967's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : As oppose to Suh ripping off two QBS helmets and throwing them to the ground, doing it? We see nasty after the whistle or unnecessary plays happen all the time. How many unnecessary hits or dirty plays can we point to in the history of the NFL? Dozens? Hundreds? How many Heirich Himmler "how-to" dog camps can we find in the history of the NFL? The other difference his, Haynesworth was embarrassed and apologized for that. Vick just told us he did nothing wrong because he grew up around it. Game, set and match.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]



    Steve Deossie claims he went to a dogfight when he was in the NFL, does this not mean he is not also a dispicable criminal and loves violence against animals?
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Steve Deossie claims he went to a dogfight when he was in the NFL, does this not mean he is not also a dispicable criminal and loves violence against animals?
    Posted by PhllyPhn1967[/QUOTE]

    Took part in electrocuting the losing dog in the fight, by throwing him in a 20 gallon bucket of cold water, and sticking a live electrical cord in it, then watched it squirm & twitch til death...?  If so=Then maybe, not the most admirable of human beings.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from PhllyPhn1967. Show PhllyPhn1967's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : I'm just sayin', You didn't try to swerve at ALL?  I mean, it's a common reaction, not to just needlessly WANT to run something over, isn't it?  I guess it's the "want" factor, I'm perturbed with.  Really, there were times on busy roads, or just realizing that at that last second, you're more in danger of doin' something st#pid by crossing a bit too far over on that other side of the lane, in terms of killin' yourself, but on a slow wide open road...No swerve whatsoever?  Just even a speck minor one, then you go, "Oh, Aggh=cr#p (kaplunk dead chipmunk)."  But not even THIS?!?! But oh yea, IF I could get away with it (and no, not directing this to ANY-one)...  Yea, I'd surely kill some humans rather than needlessly torturing some small domesticated animal...haha, no doubt, no doubt-a-rooskie.  Animals just want your pureness, they read (human oriented ones moreso even) your intentions, the depth of pureness in your motives & emotions.  Linking and bonding with this, and their love when they sense you're "good" or whatever way you wanna define it, This gives alot of us crazy folks, that small touch of Eden that we seem to have lost.
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]


    If I had the oportunity to run a biker riding two-four abreast on the back roads of Lincoln, Concord, Westford, Bedford into a pricker bush I would do that too. Does this really make me a bad person?
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from PhllyPhn1967. Show PhllyPhn1967's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Took part in electrocuting the losing dog in the fight, by throwing him in a 20 gallon bucket of cold water, and sticking a live electrical cord in it, then watched it squirm & twitch til death...?  If so=Then maybe, not the most admirable of human beings.
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]

    Read the transcripts of the hearing, Vick never admitted to electrocuting, torturing, or killing dogs but providing the house of which an operation did so. And dogs do not last long when electrocuted, nor do any animals, or humans for that matter.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from PhllyPhn1967. Show PhllyPhn1967's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Listen to yourself. Millions upon millions of people speed, thousands drive poorly or recklessly. I am not defending those people, as it's not a good idea. But, to compare into a context of long term, established interstate crime (felonies), with secrat campuses of dog torture chambers, makes you the worst wannabe lawyer on earth. And a full fledged dipsh*t. Not hard for you, though, Phat Rex.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    And if you do so repeatedly, and get caught while intoxicated, it means negligence. It is not that hard to understand, unless you have a dog in the fight so to say.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from PeaceLaur. Show PeaceLaur's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    Parts of this article just make me feel ill. Especially this excerpt:

    "For a while, it was all 'Scold Mike Vick, scold Mike Vick, just talk bad about him, like he's not a person,' " he says. "It's almost as if everyone wanted to hate me. But what have I done to anybody? It was something that happened, and it was people trying to make some money."

    He doesn't even get it. I was hoping, after all the work he had done with the Humane Society, that he understood his actions were wrong. But I guess he still sees it as just "something that happened."

    I'm starting school in a pre-veterinary program right now, and people like Mike Vick terrify me. He obviously still sees those pit bulls who were drowned, beaten, and electrocuted as means to an end. They were just a way for him to make money, and the only hitch was that he had the misfortune of getting caught. When he speaks about it, I notice it's always in relation to how it messed up his life & career -- never anything about the animals' suffering.

    I'm not religious, but if I were, I would pray to God that he is never allowed to own a dog again.
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from patsfaninpa420. Show patsfaninpa420's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    Ha ha,  Mike Vick duped the NFL and Philly. Alot of people thought he was the model of a second chancer making the most of it. It's obvious now that he learned two things in prison- jack and sh!t.
     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxxcrwn. Show xxxcrwn's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    You'd have to be a moron to believe Vick when he said he'd learned what he did was wrong. He said that to get a lesser sentence & to get back in to the NFL. He is only sorry he got caught. Goodell was his usual incompetent self by letting him back in to the NFL. No player has a right to work in the NFL. It's a privelage that too many of the players take for granted. If the NFL wants to make a statement they need to have a policy in place that if you go are convicted & go to jail you are out for good. No second chance, gone forever. As far as blaming a criminal culture for his actions, that's a sorry excuse by a weak minded individual to try to justify what he did.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]You can kill and/or torture animals, but not humans.  
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]

    Unless you're Dick Cheney, Laz.  
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from lippa. Show lippa's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

       Vick needs to learn to keep his mouth shut,wheres dungy to back him up out of this hole he dug for himself.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : The problem is people are making allegations based on this interview.  Who's to say he isn't remorseful?  Did he say he wasn't sorry?  Did he say he wished he was still doing it?  People are just way too sensitive. 
    Posted by N2thaIzzo[/QUOTE]

    I have a simple rule. Say what you mean and mean what you say. Are you trying to tell me that his direct quotes can't be taken anyother way then he only feels bad because he got caught and it wasn't his fault?

    " But what have I done to anybody? It was something that happened, and it was people trying to make some money"

    read that statement and how can you not take it as 'I did nothing wrong. It just happened because I wanted to make money' Does that sound remorseful at all to you?
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]You just spent 3 pages pretending Mankins punching a guy in the nuts or Haynesworth stupidly kicking a guy in the head are the same thing as Vick's discreet little concentration camp hobby for dogs. lol So, please explain how on field antics are the same as felonies. WE as in "edcuated Pats fans" who aren't stupid. You know, like yourself. You'll notice all except one Pats fan agrees with me.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    I spent 3 pages pretending Mankins punching a guy in the nuts was the same as Vick???  I never mentioned Mankins, YOU DID.  OH wait, i am you so I guess i did but not me really, you pretending to be me.  Did i get that right???
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from CaptFoxboro. Show CaptFoxboro's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]So far, what I'm gathering is that- Vick's actions were O.k. because any of the following: Dog torture is better than child molestation and/or rape. Phillyfan likes to run over chipmunks on the road, and/or he doesn't actually trully "like" to run them over, but he does anyway...And he's not 1 bit sorry.  So neither should be Vick. Electrocuting dogs is sorta like going 5 miles over the legal speed limit at times:  We all do it, right? The Philadelphia Eagle Fan thinks that The Pats Fans have a biased agenda against The Eagles own, Michael Vick. You can kill and/or torture animals, but not humans.  This includes chipmunks, and even though I forget the correct moral stance on pigeons, Humans are included too, IF they're on motorcycles riding side by side down a road. They do c#ck fighting in Mexico, and it's not about the torture or animal cruelty, It's about Gambling...  In otherwords, Hanging dieing dogs by nylon cords/body-slamming losing dogs on the ground & hitting them with a shovel=A-O.k..  Largely this is because there was money riding on the prior action, and because South Carolina is a culture somewhere in that "grey" area between Mexico and The United States. "Leave Michael Vick ALONE!!! Because he is Awesome (I hope he sees this phone cam pic of me)."  I believe there was another... Oh:  Dogfighting/torture=Keepin' the poor black man from the South, down.  Everyone who's ANYone has pitbulls.  They sorta WANNA fight each other, ya know?  And so, you can let'm tear at each other for a bit, and if they're on leashes and you refer to it as "bumping", then Michael Vick=Sportsman of the year <also, you can do the same w/ your child as a pedophile...IF you call it "bumping", and IF you're a certain color/creed/ and or reside somewhere but not limited too, East of Shianne, South of Nashville, West of Biloxy, and North of Jacksonville (but not including Jacksonville itself).  
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]

    Way to some up the debate Laz ... priceless.

    I for one do not subscibe to the "I do not wish physical harm onto opponents" sports mantra ( when it comes to degenerates like Vick anyways )

    Maybe James Harrison will seperate Vick from a body part in tonghts preseason action ?

     Even though it would be next-to-unbearable to witness - I'd rather see sexyRexy hoist the Lombardi trophy than see T U R DS like Vick and Phllyphn1967 be allowed to bask in championship glory . 
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Harleyroadking-11. Show Harleyroadking-11's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : If I had the oportunity to run a biker riding two-four abreast on the back roads of Lincoln, Concord, Westford, Bedford into a pricker bush I would do that too. Does this really make me a bad person?
    Posted by PhllyPhn1967[/QUOTE]

    try it I'll put a bullet in your head
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share