Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Where do we begin with this, Phat Rex/MCCheaters? So much to dispel here from you: 1.  How many athletes have supposedly "groped" women? If this was actually a real charge and conviction, the entire 1970 Bruins hockey team would have been in jail, not to mention many ahtletes through the years. 2. You're telling me reckless speeding or a DUI is intentional and on the same level of torturing domesticated animals with drowning, electrocution, and inhuman chambers for entertainment?  Yeah, and the sky is brown, too. LMAO 3. I think Haynesworth overreacted when he stomped on Gurode's head. As stated REPEATEDLY here, no one is defending it, just like when Eddie Shore almost decapitated Ace Bailey of the Maple Leafs in the 1930s....Or....Or....Or... There is a laundry list of ON FIELD antics that MANY players across all sports regret from their heat of the moment actions. You trollish idiots comparing those to Vick's Nazified dog concentration camps is a an embarrassment for you. Absolutely pathetic.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    I use to find you amusing Rusty but now your going into an area of dangerous to society.

    1) Groping women is not a "real" crime?  Wow, maybe if actually knew a real women, and she was groped you could ask her if she thought it was a crime.

    2) Driving reckless and DUI is not intentional???  Wow again.  Your going 100 mph in a 30 mph and its NOT intentional?  Your drunk and you get behind the wheel and its not intentional???  Again, maybe if your driving home some night and you get slammed by a drunk driver, "intent" will be driven home to you.  Reckless driving and DUI leads to HUMAN LIFES LOST.  So yea I consider that on the same level of dogs being killed, gee maybe even higher.

    Nazified dog concentration camps. LOL, that one goes in the classic Rusty quotes file.  To bad they didn't have a Hogan's Heroes type German Shepard to help them tunnel out and escape.  Starring Rusty Can as Sargent Schultz --- "I saw nothingggg" "I know nothingggg" 
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from PhllyPhn1967. Show PhllyPhn1967's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : It was a dirty hit and Tatum knows it.  He was notorious for being dirty, too.  Complain? It was a dirty hit in a preseason game, geek.  Totally unnecessary. His lack of sympathy or remorse afterwards was also a disgrace. Go back to Philly if you love that smelly NJ border city dump so much. 
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    And so ripping off a guys helmet and stepping on his head causing 30 stitches is not unnecessary and a violent crime of which the most sever suspension in NFL history was levied? WOW, dude you are over the top.




     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : And so ripping off a guys helmet and stepping on his head causing 30 stitches is not unnecessary and a violent crime of which the most sever suspension in NFL history was levied? WOW, dude you are over the top.
    Posted by PhllyPhn1967[/QUOTE]

    That post is out of bounds Philly.  You can't use common sense or logic when dealing with Rusty.  He has no concept of either.
     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from CaptainZdeno33. Show CaptainZdeno33's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    Russ, I think Patsman3 is in love with you

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rocky. Show Rocky's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    Why is a Eagles troll talking trash here...The Eagles have made it to the SB how many times in the last 11 years?  I think he/she has Patriots envy?  Or he/she just needs a place to vent his/her anger? Too bad so many trolls here have BPD... : (  I actually feel bad for them.....
     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from N2thaIzzo. Show N2thaIzzo's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : He's entitled to his opinion much like we are to make an opinion on him. You can't say leave the man alone and then claim everyone is entitled to their opinion. It's not like we are going up to his door and saying this we are giving our opinions on a forum which is as much our right as his to his comments. I can't stand when people say, he didn't do anything to you. Well technically Hitler didn't do anything to me either (not comparing him to Hitler just taking it to an extreme). A lot of criminals didn't do anything to any of us yet they get criticized and rightfully so. It's not just about you it's about everyone and the fact that he hurt people when he took their family pets off their yards and feed them to his fighting dogs to give them a taste of blood is well disturbing to say the least. Having many family dogs in my life should I not feel disgust when I hear stories like that? Yes he did his time, that doesn't mean I have to like the guy. Since, he came out with these comments I like him even less. I'm not going to say put him back in jail but at the same time I think he should be rightfully criticized if he shows that he is not very sorry for his unlawful actions when he keeps trying to come out and revive his imagine by making speeches about how bad dog fighting is. Esp, considering it sounds like he doesn't think it is wrong to begin with
    Posted by PatsEng[/QUOTE]

    The problem is people are making allegations based on this interview.  Who's to say he isn't remorseful?  Did he say he wasn't sorry?  Did he say he wished he was still doing it?  People are just way too sensitive. 
     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : 1. Yes, afterall a he said/she said crime is really a felony, especially when it comes to peopel with money as the accused. I am very concerned with "groping" claims. 2. Speeding is not always intentional, no. I do it everyday as do millions of Americans. Anything else or aree you going to explain the differences between the word "intentional" and "unintentional"? LMAO Good thing you compared "groping", speeding and reckless driving to a person who spent his free time hoarding dogs in order to torture them. You sure are a bright guy, Phat Rex.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    LOL speeding is not always intentional because you do it every day.  I see so if he was having dog fights everyday then it wasnt intentional.  If other people were doing it then it wasnt intentional.  To quote Inigo Montoya "I dont think that word means what you think it does" 
     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : 1. Yes, afterall a he said/she said crime is really a felony, especially when it comes to peopel with money as the accused. I am very concerned with "groping" claims. 2. Speeding is not always intentional, no. I do it everyday as do millions of Americans. Anything else or aree you going to explain the differences between the word "intentional" and "unintentional"? LMAO Good thing you compared "groping", speeding and reckless driving to a person who spent his free time hoarding dogs in order to torture them. You sure are a bright guy, Phat Rex.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    peopel?  Is that new word Rusty.  Boy your so quick to spellcheck everyone else but not yourself.  Shame on you Rusty....

    aree?  another new word? You must be in a real lather over there typing so fast, making mistakes, not spellchecking.  Deep breath Rusty, calm down!!!!
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sam-Adams. Show Sam-Adams's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    IMO he's not really sorry for what he did. I never got that from him at anytime during this entire ordeal. He's sorry he got caught, I'll guarantee that but he's not sorry for the dogs.

    He tells the public what they want to hear....what Goodell needs to hear but you can hear it in what he says that he's not sorry. Blaming his neighborhood and family situations is crap. Does he want us to believe his family didn't have money for clothes or food but they did to raise dogs for fighting?

    If Karma truly does exist I hope he breaks his leg Theisman style the first play of every season he plays.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]Oh, and BTW, I ran over a chipmunk last weekend and I did not try and swerve to miss him. Should I report my crime?
    Posted by PhllyPhn1967[/QUOTE]

    I'm just sayin', You didn't try to swerve at ALL?  I mean, it's a common reaction, not to just needlessly WANT to run something over, isn't it?  I guess it's the "want" factor, I'm perturbed with.  Really, there were times on busy roads, or just realizing that at that last second, you're more in danger of doin' something st#pid by crossing a bit too far over on that other side of the lane, in terms of killin' yourself, but on a slow wide open road...No swerve whatsoever?  Just even a speck minor one, then you go, "Oh, Aggh=cr#p (kaplunk dead chipmunk)."  But not even THIS?!?!

    But oh yea, IF I could get away with it (and no, not directing this to ANY-one)...  Yea, I'd surely kill some humans rather than needlessly torturing some small domesticated animal...haha, no doubt, no doubt-a-rooskie.  Animals just want your pureness, they read (human oriented ones moreso even) your intentions, the depth of pureness in your motives & emotions.  Linking and bonding with this, and their love when they sense you're "good" or whatever way you wanna define it, This gives alot of us crazy folks, that small touch of Eden that we seem to have lost.
     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Listen to yourself. Millions upon millions of people speed, thousands drive poorly or recklessly. I am not defending those people, as it's not a good idea. But, to compare into a context of long term, established interstate crime (felonies), with secrat campuses of dog torture chambers, makes you the worst wannabe lawyer on earth. And a full fledged dipsh*t. Not hard for you, though, Phat Rex.
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    secrat?  Another new word.

    I compared sexual assault, road rage assault, reckless driving and paralyzing a guy and stomping on a guys head with dog camps.  How you then twist that is your problem Rusty.

    I just enjoyed watching you make all these ludicrous arguments to defend your point.  Truly entertaining Rusty.  Or should I say TexasPat3.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : I don't use spellcheck. Actually, I work for a living, unlike yourself. Get a degree sometime. lmao PS We still await your definition of intentional and unintentional. Thanks, Pats Fans with IQ's well above 80
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    Because you work you can't use spellcheck? LOL.  Well based on your posts you really should start.
     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rocky. Show Rocky's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    Fireman Ed, Leon, Phat Rex, and McCheaters.....A guy or girl with Multiple Personality Disorder issues....
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from CommChairman. Show CommChairman's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

     "I totally agree he hasnt learned nothing and dont understand why he was convicted".

    And what have you learned?
     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Are you ever going to define "sexual assault"? Or this "groping" claim? I don't; see that anywhere for Haynesworth or Vick. I do see restraining orders against Vick, though. lol How is it "ludicrous" to ask you to explain how a misdemeanor is the same as a felony or how intentional as the same as unintentional? YOu still haven't articulated how they are the same either. Exposed. You seem to have a problem knowing basic English words, Phat Rex. Like I said, don't apply to law school. Your application will end up as the laughingstock of the pile. Finally, I am not twisting anything. We have 3 trolls all on one side, some strange person asking us to leave Vick alone and then everyone else agrees with me. You idiots are comparing torture of animals as a hobby as the same thing as a one off mistake or some other minor poor behavior antics that millions of American are guilty of, yet pretend they are on the same level. Pathetic!
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    Ok I will try to enlighten you Rusty Stump:

    1) Yes groping is sexual assault.  I don't have to define it, it is the LAW. Go look it up Einstein.

    2) You don't see that anywhere for Haynesworth. LOL he goes on trial for it next week.  Stop looking at the gay porn and read a newspaper.

    3) Intentional the same as unintentional? I never said they were the same.  What I said was everything Haynesworth did was INTENTIONAL.  Clear enough for you yet?

    4) Leave Vick alone?  I never said that.  Go back to my first post, I congratulated you for your stand on Vick.  All I asked was you apply the same standard to Hayesworth.  Since then you have made me laugh with YOUR defense of Haynesworth.  I mean only you Rusty could categorize sexual assault and reckless driving (paralyzing a person) as "minor poor behavior antics".  I am not defending either, I think they BOTH belong out of the league.

    Unlike you I am not a hypocrite who bases my opinion on which team the player is on.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Patsman3. Show Patsman3's posts

    Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting

    In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Vick Comments on Dog Fighting : Don't forget Bralon and Patsman3. Bralon is a Giants fan, apparently, and has 2500 posts in 16 months. Pretty hard to racthet up that many posts as a Giants fan on a Pats board. LMAO
    Posted by RidingWithTheKing[/QUOTE]

    Don't forget RidingWithTheKing.  I am convinced he is actually all of them and is arguing with himself.  Dude puts Sybil to shame...

    Oh my God that means I am really Rusty.  Pulls out gun..BANG!!!!!
     

Share