Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from PMacPatFan. Show PMacPatFan's posts

    Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

    Here's an older article that talk about how effective Tommy Kelly could be with a good nose tackle to partner with.....aaah, like our boy, Vince.

    It was written when he was in Oakland. A good read....Kinda gets me a little excited.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/327021-oakland-raiders-its-time-to-get-tommy-kelly-a-partner-in-crime-at-dt

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

    good read but that was 3 years ago. The 3 years does make a pretty big difference. It would have been amazing to see both line up next to each other when both were 29, still should be interesting to see them line up next to eachother now but Oak's priorities were Byrant, then Seymour, then Kelley for a reason. In limited situational reps though he should provide a better pass rush then either Love or Deadrick and could be used as a bridge to give a year for Armstead or Forston to develop.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from rkarp. Show rkarp's posts

    Re: Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

    In response to PatsEng's comment:

    good read but that was 3 years ago. The 3 years does make a pretty big difference. It would have been amazing to see both line up next to each other when both were 29, still should be interesting to see them line up next to eachother now but Oak's priorities were Byrant, then Seymour, then Kelley for a reason. In limited situational reps though he should provide a better pass rush then either Love or Deadrick and could be used as a bridge to give a year for Armstead or Forston to develop.



    based on that logic lets resign Branch, Stallworth and Milloy...problems solved

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

    In response to rkarp's comment:

    In response to PatsEng's comment:

     

    good read but that was 3 years ago. The 3 years does make a pretty big difference. It would have been amazing to see both line up next to each other when both were 29, still should be interesting to see them line up next to eachother now but Oak's priorities were Byrant, then Seymour, then Kelley for a reason. In limited situational reps though he should provide a better pass rush then either Love or Deadrick and could be used as a bridge to give a year for Armstead or Forston to develop.

     



    based on that logic lets resign Branch, Stallworth and Milloy...problems solved

     



    except Kelley is still functional and better then our current alternatives. Branch would have a hard time beating out Jones at this point and Stallworths legs can't get him 10 yrds before he might pull up. Milloy though..... nah still to young lol

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Action-Jackson. Show Action-Jackson's posts

    Re: Vince Wilfork & Tommy Kelly

    .

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share