Vincent Jackson

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    Yeah there must be something in place because this would be insane. After a big road win, you don't blow up your team. Moss I'm sure is a nut job and would never get a long term deal here after the season, but you don't trade away the little talent that we have 4 games into the season.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from aidenj2005. Show aidenj2005's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    In Response to Re: Vincent Jackson:
    Yeah there must be something in place because this would be insane. After a big road win, you don't blow up your team. Moss I'm sure is a nut job and would never get a long term deal here after the season, but you don't trade away the little talent that we have 4 games into the season.
    Posted by mthurl


    it makes sense to go out and get jackson now while we are on bye week so we can get him some work with this offense lets just hope we got something big in the works if not i hate how we just stock pile draft picks we need a running back now we need a deep threat
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Spetznaz24. Show Spetznaz24's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    What would it take to get Jackson?  Would 2 2nd rounders be enough?
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    I don't see Jackson coming. To much money when we already have a plethora of WR's. Tate looked great this past game and they have been steadily increasing his looks while reducing Moss's so it makes sense they feel Tate can replace Moss. Normally I would say that wouldn't be possible but with Hernandez needing a S to cover it takes care of doubling up on either Welker or Tate. Then of course you still have Edelman as a 3rd WR (like Welker in his first year). They are also very high on Price and Woodhead might have proven he could be that receiving/draw back. With all these players showing promise the offense might go back to the 01-05 offenses with a couple good #1's but no real elite receivers.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from aidenj2005. Show aidenj2005's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    i believe a 2nd and a 3rd is what chargers are holding out for
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1023us. Show m1023us's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    LOL!  The Pats will be fine without Moss.....They don't need him.....
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from jbolted. Show jbolted's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    Jackson is NOT going to New England. You guys apparently don't know AJ Smith that well.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from btownteamsrking. Show btownteamsrking's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    the SD GM has issues. this wont happen
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from TSWFAN. Show TSWFAN's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    In Response to Re: Vincent Jackson:
    LOL!  The Pats will be fine without Moss.....They don't need him.....
    Posted by m1023us


    m1023 .... You persist in confirming your lack of knowledge.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from 49Patriots. Show 49Patriots's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    Won't happen. Tha Chargers hate the Pats, they won't help us get better. 
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1023us. Show m1023us's posts

    Re: Vincent Jackson

    In Response to Re: Vincent Jackson:
    In Response to Re: Vincent Jackson : m1023 .... You persist in confirming your lack of knowledge.
    Posted by TSWFAN


    And that is your comeback?  LOL!  nice knowledge you got there!
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share