In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:
"Dude, it's Jay Mohr. Christ, I've stood next to the guy at a concert before"
Tell us more man, that sounds incredible!!!!!
Did he smile at you or was he more focused on what Supertramp was playing?
In fairness to you, you've been calling out Denver for a while for transgressions, seems you are orbiting closer to being right on that point.
You're actually right a lot of the time in here when you aren't trolling on Brady.
The urban dictionary has a revealing section on trolling. Here't their list of points on when trolling is successful:
*Your victim screaming in all-caps at you.
*Personal attacks (Calling you a ret##rd, idiot, etc).
*Being an Internet Tough Guy.
*Making a crude remark, before quickly logging off before you can retort.
Sounds a lot like you, no?
Congrats. Please tell me again how Brady cost us two Super Bowls, it's been like three hours since your last regurgistation.
As for TFB, no idea why you give him such a hard time.
OK, he went off the rails after his hero Welker didn't resign. But it seems he recovered pretty well. He actually largely moveed on from that topic, something you could learn from.
I think he's a good dude and a welcome contributor here, whether I agree with him or not.
That said if Denver ends up being a crummy team this year a lot of folks are going to owe you an apology. Of course you'll owe most of them an apology for being so insufferable but at least it will go both ways.
You do a terrible job of taking me on. Seriously. You call yourself a troll spanker and then watch the trolls come in and out of here to troll.
As for me being at a concert with Jay Mohr, I wasn't saying it to impress anyone, I was saying it because Jay Mohr, you or my opinion on Von Miller's PED tests don't really mean anything.
Weed and ectsasy via Jay Mohr on a radio show is pointless to this conversation. It's not just weed that Miller is testing positive for. Duh.
We've heard every excuse in the book. Weed, ectasy, he missed his test, etc. But, at the end of the day, that tool tested positive for amphetamine in 2011 and was never punished for that.
Now, he's so entitled, he thinks Denver will pay off someone again and get him off the hook. Sorry, born at night, not last night.
6 games minimum and maybe more if they are looking into his 2011 amphetamine positive test, otherwise they would not have said "6 for sure, maybe more".
Finally, TFB12 has NOT moved on from that Welkie topic at all. He just started a troll thread about Amendola being given a day off on a Monday, which is normally film day anyway, and the irony is Welker is the one who got hurt this weekend!
So, you lose there, too.
You call me insufferable, I call it me defending myself simply because I've been right so many times here, it's become hilarious that people claim I am wrong or so off base as much as they do.
I can make a list of things here where I've been in a debate with a premise, stuck by it under attack, and then been correct when the dust settled.
I don't care what the topic is. Drafts, who will win the lockout, cap levels, cap hell teams, Jets debacle and why they were doomed to fail, other teams that are rivals who actually have made serious mis-steps off the lockout, Tommy Kelly outplaying Seymour in Oakland in 2010 and 201(and 2010 since Seymour got hurt) and the hilarity of Kelly now coming here because of the Raiders cap hell.
Oh wait! Mt Hurl tells us there is no cap hell and all NFL players can easily be replaced like in Baltimore with two HOFers leaving and Mike Huff and a rookie named Arthur Brown taking over for some guy named Ray Lewis. Sure. Easily replaced, right Troll Spankie?
Basically, when I get mocked, I know I've won. That's pretty much it in a nutshell. I said my main worry was Brady in the 2011 AFC title game. Our D was really good, Brady sucked. Right again.
I could go on and on and on about it, so stop pretending I don't have the right to defend myself.
Within the last month RKrap and his losers were following me around saying Miller did not test for amphetamine in 2011. In fact, RKrap edited an article which said he tested for weed and amphetamine. That's how sneaky he is.
They'll try to tell you, me and whoever else that 2+2 = 5 until they're blue in the face, but they can't change the fact it's 4.
But, you keep giving them a leg to stand on, Troll Spankie. You're part of the problem enabling them.
Finally, I never said Denver would be "crummy". I said they're completely overrated by the media. A big part of it is the media trying to paint BB like a bozo in walking from Welkie. IMO, do not expect Gomer to have the same chemistry with Welker as Brady did. Two different QBs and styles.
As much as the Brady/Welker binky relationship basically cost us 2 SBs and numerous playoff games we should have won by running more and being smarter in game management, Brady has an uncanny knack for putting the ball where only Welker could get it. Manning likes seam routes with his slot guys. Welker didn't run a ton of seams here. In fact, when he did, they usually didn't work because he's so small.
Basically I think anyone who would read through all this (of what I'm sure is crap), is a fool. What I do know is that you and TFB are having a little fight - so let me step in and solve it. TFB wins!! You can continue on as the village idiot...a laughing stock of sorts...an embarrassment to all Patriot fans and New Englanders alike. Hey as a consolation prize, you can disappear or head on over to the Bruin's forum where they despise you even more. Congrats! Keep up the good work!