Re: What should BB have done about the WR position.
posted at 9/16/2013 11:08 PM EDT
In response to pcmIV's comment:
In response to pezz4pats' comment:
Count again,... Einstein, threw in Woody for good measure. Replaced by and injured, Ir'd player who is not playing. So who gets his catches? BRANCH< LLOYD< WELKER< FELLS . Who the hell gives you the right to just drop Branch? He was a vet receiver for the NEP.
True or false?
3 rookie receivers replaced 3 vet receivers. Correct?
1 rookie uda fa TE replaces a Vet TE. TE's play catch too. Correct?
What part of this s hit don't you get?
The top 5 receivers from last years team were Welker, Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd and Woodhead. Fells and Branch weren't even major contributors for this team and barely saw the field. Of the top 5 guys that actually made up the passing offense we only chose to dump 3 of them and two were replaced with vets. Lloyd is the only one that they were counting on the rookies to replace. Vereen was supposed to replace Woodhead and Amendola/Edelman were supposed to replace Welker. Last time I checked Edelman is still healthy and has 20 catches through 2 games so Welker hasn't been replaced with a rookie. Sudfeld is replacing Hernandez not Gronk. Hooman is replacing Gronk because he is the superior blocker. Sudfeld wouldn't be playing if Hernandez was on the roster.
You keep blasting BB for dismantling the record setting offense and replacing them with rookies and then two of your examples were barely involved in the record setting offense. Branch and Fells scored zero TDs and combined for under 250 yards receiving last season. The offense wouldn't be any better if those two guys were on the roster. Of course this is all bs because your original premise was that BB is an idiot for using rookies when in fact he had vets lined up to replace 2 of the 3 the guys he actually dumped (Woodhead and Welker) and now you are shifiting the goalposts trying to include injured guys after I exposed you for the liar you are.
My origional premise was rookies and injured players, big boy. Been saying it all week. No need to lie but you may want to improve your reading comprehension before you get squished like a bug again.
Fact, 3 rookie recievers , replaced vets,
Fact, 1 rookie UDFA, TE replaced 3 vet TE's. Injured Gronk out, (surprise) Fells gone, Hern gone
Fact, and oft injured player replaced a seasoned vet Welker>Amadola Not playing (surprise)means rookies are taking snaps, because that's all they have.
Fact, an oft injured Vereen replaced a versatile and reliable Woody,, Not playing,(surprise) which means rookies are taking snaps, because that's all they have.
1 Rookie UDfa TE who was always injured is also injured leaving 1 TE and some guy from the rubbish heap. Not playing, which means rookies are, because that's all they have .
Do you understand because of BB, (Thank you BB), they are playing and they are not ready to be playing, because that's all they have? Do you get it yet?
#1, record setting O is a now pile of dookie, and may not make the play-offs.
I'm bashing BB because he was ill prepared for the inevitable ( injury prone players get injured) with no plan B or C or D. NOTHING BUT ROOKIES. Because that's all they have.
DO YOU GET IT YET?
I bash BB because he had a top 10 D or better, for years and made them a bottom 5 or worse, after the talent left. Do you get it yet?
You questioned me when I said 9-7 for this team this off season. You still questioning it, or do you get it yet?
Big, tough boy, with BB's face, photo shopped. Huh? Are ya?