In response to TrueChamp's comment:
No we wouldn't, because he played behind 4 players who were better. Because our team has good depth at the position doesn't mean that a player is bad. Its a good situation to have a guy like that as your #4, that is reality. If the guy came in and sucked with his given opportunities then you could label him as a "bad player".
Do you see the difference, or is this just another fallen on deaf ears type of conversation?
Well when you put your fingers in your ears saying "lalala every player who was ever signed to the Pats is a good player" I guess you can call that deaf ears.
True saying he's a bad player doesn't mean he's a bad person. He's a JAG nothing more nothing less. JAGs are not good players and are easily replaced. If you make so little and end up being cut because another JAG can replace you that means you are bad because not only were you easily replaced but that they would cut you because even as a 4th RB there are better options. Then again you still believe A. Wilson was a good signing so your idea of good is skewed into outer space somewhere.