Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Who should get more blame for this loss?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from fishers5. Show fishers5's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    If you can watch replay of game....look at #'s 44..50..24...27.. 93...95... and see why there was such a sad sad performance...  talk about seeming lost...!!!!!!

    The evaluation process seems to be slipping....

    I had to turn it off and watch teams where the defense seems to know what they were doing and fun to look at...

    Sorry but a defensive coordinator is needed to change what the team is doing...PLZZZZZZ  no more prevent defense from 1st quarter till the fourth quarter,,,

    Rather get beat playing one on one that the soft zone that i watched....thats it guys....stay back 10 yards and then turn and run...maybe the Qb will make a mistake..

    other than Mccourty and chung.....they suckkkkkkkkkkkkk

    Other than Mayo and Spikes....all are maybe at best good reserves

    Shame on the evaluators...BB and coaches...
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from quasi1981. Show quasi1981's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?:
    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss? : This has nothing to do with play balance.  The offense should execute whatever plays are called. And you don't just say ... hey, we are going to run only or pass only. IF the Steelers are putting men in the box like they were most of the first half today you run a PA fake, and break a play over their head. That will back them off of the run realy quickly.  They didn't execute.  Passing the ball a few more times wouldn't have likely changed the outcome unless those passes worked better than the other ones before them. 
    Posted by zbellino

    Brady was on the radio last week and was asked about different formations and how we see them on tv, and TB laughed when they said the same thing you were saying about loading the box, you know the D is trying to stop the run.  TB said, which is so obvious, that maybe they are getting set to blitz!!

    We think we know the game and all it details, yet we know little.
      
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?:
    Let's face it. We just don't have the players. We have nobody on D who scares the other team and has to be accounted for. We have no deep threat. We have a hundred mediocre running backs. We're still good because of a few good players, mostly on offense. But how the hell do we win a SB with this?
    Posted by BabeParilli


    This seems right to me.  Just go by unit:

    Secondary--Chung and McCourty are the only guys who might be legitimate NFL starters, but even they look more like back-ups recently

    LBs--Ninkovich and Guyton as starters?  Not exactly world beaters there.

    DL--Wilfork, Carter (old), and a bunch of JAGs

    RBs--I love Kevin Faulk, but when a 35 year old just off the PUP is your main guy, you are in big, big trouble

    WR--Welker, then Branch (who would be an excellent number 3) and then who?

    OL, TE, QB--there is good quality on these units, but you can't win with Brady throwing to Gronk, Welker, and Hernandez every play on offense and no pass defense whatsoever . . . 



     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from threejak. Show threejak's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    Try thinking less about the "blame"  and more about the fix.....
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from MuellerTime19. Show MuellerTime19's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    3RD AND 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. 

    IT DOESNT MATTER.


    1ST DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from JayShizzle45. Show JayShizzle45's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    This is just simply a case of the stats holding true to their numbers.

    The Steelers have the #1 pass defense and it showed.

    The Pats have the 32nd ranked Pass defense, and they def. played to their stats today...

    This front running team has shown that if we get down, most likey we wont get back up. We have to play with a lead and even then we give it up most times. We still have no identity and our defense is now a worn out speed bump.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?:
    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss? : The Ryan brothers play aggressive man coverage more than anyone else. In fact, Ne had good success last time they played the Jets because Ryan tried to act like LeBeau and was running zone exchanges.  This week, LeBeau was in bump and run. And no, it's not called, man zone. A play where some drop back into zone and others rush is called a zone exchange, unless you are sending more than five rushers, then it is a zone blitz. This was agressive man coverage, mostly cover one shell, with very little actual "blitzing" as they were primarly only sending 4 guys, with some five man rushes mixed in. Of course, it doesn't really matter. They had their safety up at the line and their corners at the line. Defenses aren't called "run" or "pass." If you have ten guys close to the LOS, with your safety cheating in, you are essentially daring the other team to pass it over your head. 
    Posted by zbellino



    Which is exactly what I said. The Jets defensive fronts looked the same. The Cowboys had 7-8 bodies at or near the LOS but then would rush 4 at the most, lots of times 3 only. CB's are bumping and LB's even DE's are dropping back in the zone and putting their hands in the air.


    No matter what  the particular defensive set is it is called the results were the same. 7-8 bodies covering 4 receiving options, yet we threw it anyway.

    The pics you showed are pre-snap, when those plays develop as you said there is no blitzing. They drop back. We were throwing into a crowded field. All of this without 3 of the best defensive players against the run. Farrior,Harrison and Woodley going down in the 3rd.

    We were never down by 20. We cannot be one dimensional, and we were.....again.Our only td till the 2 min warning in the 4rth came because the defense picked off Ben inside the 20. Terrible.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from JohnHannahrulz. Show JohnHannahrulz's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?:
    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss? : Hog, that is what I'm saying. At the same time, big bad Gronk and Hernandez need to win some of their matchups. NE DOES need a physical WR or two. But they still need to execute.  Slandering the 49ers, though, doesn't make much sense. They basically owned the NFL with a finesse offense. The difference was that they had much, much better WRs than NE.  Jerry Rice, John Taylor, et al, is better than Welker and Branch by a mile stretch, and it gets uglier when you get past those two. About the onside kick. They work about 10% of the time in those situations. The defense had been terrible for most of the day, but I would like to think that there is a greater than 10% chance that they stop the Steelers deep. Even if they take six downs and the 2 minutes to stop them, it gives you waay better field position than your own 20 to get the TD. Kick it out of the back of the endzone. Stop them on the thirty. Get a decent return. You have 30 seconds to get 60 yards in stead of 30 seconds to get eighty yards. H-e-c-k if you repeat the same sequence, the Steelers are punting out of the end zone, and you maybe get the ball at the 50 or Steelers' 45. 
    Posted by zbellino



    They could have exploited the missmatches with Gronk and Hernandez more, but I think Hernandez was nicked up (injured). The point is the Patriots used to be the team that dominated the line and played physical pass defense against finesse teams (Manning-led Colts)and now they are a finesse team that everyone with decent defense plays physical. Sorry for bringing up the Niners, however, the Niners also made use of screens to Roger Craig and quick slants to negate the pass rush. Something the Patriots don't do often enough.O Brien or BB had to find a way to answer the Steelers . They didn't adjust well enough and lost.

    Granted the D played better in the 2nd half, but I don't necessarily see them pinning the Steelers deep and forcing them to punt from the end zone. That is pretty optimistic. The Steelers had a close to ideal gameplan to beat the Pats; Keep Brady off the field, play physical and confuse Brady with blitz packages, exploit the Patriots weak secondary on offense and have time-consuming drives. The Steelers O was on the field for what, 40 minutes of game time. Huge TOP. Awfully difficult to win a game when the other team takes up so much clock.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from profootball. Show profootball's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    First is the coaches.  No adjustment in second half.  Coaching in this game is D-
    In Response to Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?:
    not too hard to figure it out. the players and coaches
    Posted by BubbaInHawaii

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from MichFan. Show MichFan's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    Has't anyone figured out a trend here?  With the way the draft is structured eventually the bad teams get better and the good teams get weaker.  Not to long ago the Lions were 0 -16 and the Colts and Pats were unbeatable.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from dbeach48. Show dbeach48's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    its Halloween in NE but the horror story was in Pitt..
    team looked old and tired..no heart..
    no adjustments by bb or coaches

    they came ready to lose and it showed on the first pitt drive  for a td and the first ne drive of 3 plays for nothing..
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from beavis. Show beavis's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    I blame the Steelers for playing one of their best games all year! They could have beaten any NFL team Sunday.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from diablotin. Show diablotin's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    I felt like the D played well enough for us to have a chance to win yesterday.  The offense couldn't stay on the field and did not capitalize when they had the chance.  As bad as the defense looked from a yardage perspective, they kept the game close and only allowed 23 points... if we put our usual offensive point production forward, we kill the Steelers.  The Steelers played with high intensity and the Patriots looked flat, and that was much more obvious when the Pats O was on the field.  I didn't see the defense hanging their heads at any point even though they were outmatched, they played hard through the game and did their best.  The offense did NOT play their best game yesterday.  PICK IT UP, O!!!!
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from beavis. Show beavis's posts

    Re: Who should get more blame for this loss?

    Offensive line got manhandled. Where was the rushing game?
     
Sections
Shortcuts