Re: 2012 Sox Payroll and Big Decisions
posted at 8/9/2011 8:34 AM EDT
Moonslow, lying for you is like Clinton. I never said the Rays would " go away" in 2010. You are lying to save your own embarrassment
Part I was a direct respinse to your position. Lie away. We all know the truth..
As for leadoff, you make a big deal about it. It's not a bid deal. A player only leads off, for sure, one time in a game. Career numbers are not wide enough to be meaningful at all. You're now in a mode where you simply lead a herd of idiots. At one time, you weren't as inclined to ape all the time. Now, becuase you are so clueless on so many issues, you feel the need to protect your ego by arguing for the sake of saving face
You made a big deal about Jake's numbers at leadoff. Now, when Jake is exploding, it suddenly doen't matter? Plus, it's not just about being up 1st in an inning, it's about being on base in front of Pedey, AGon, Youk and Papi all game long..
"No one has been more wrong than" is intellectually shallow hyperbole. In fact, few have been more out to lunch than you
Your recent record reads like a horror story.
Popularity is important to you. It means nothing to me. Unless most posters are angry becuase of a comment I've made, I would be a liar. Like you
I suppose this makes sense
I was not popular with my No Manny - No Rings thread, my position on not signing Crawford, my position on platooning Crawford, my position on sitting Papi vs most LHPs for 2010 and at the start of this year, and much more Your rant is going off track badly.. .
Fact is that Kemp and Crawford is greater than Ellsbury and Crawford. And the fact is that Ellsbury and Crawford are the same type of player. You catonically saying otherwise is a complete reversal. Absurd to pay Crawford 142M if true intention was to extend or sign Ellsbury as a FA. It won't happen now, that's for sure
Your Jake for Kemp deal is as big a fantsasy as your Jake & Jed for AGone dream. It makes no sense to either team..
NL isn't AAAA. See Giants and Phillies
"AAAA" was your position, not mine. Again, lies to cover lies.
As for Kemp, this stupid board was claiming AGon wasn't going to be trade over the spring because of ticket sales. You are the same dimwit who claimed Twins coudn't afford Mauer. Don't even talk to me about trades. You don't have a clue who was on the table in past trades. And you don't have a clue about Kemp's availability
Again with the diversions and misrepresentations.
Bottom line, danny isn't scared to agree that a star slugging young Rh bat would greatly improve an OF that has zilch in that department
Of course a big RH'd bat would help. Taht's why I was for getting Holliday (at a much lower cost than Crawford ended up costing: you said he was not an elite hitter. His recent year numbers blow Kemps away and we'd still have Jake and the prospects. Get over it, LA does not want a Bora$$ client for Kemp. Why woulkdn't they just extend the younger Kemp? Why would Kemp want to come to what you call "racist Boston"? .
If you want to disagree for the sake of attracting a fan club, don't bother insulting my intelligence
There's no sign of intelligence.
And knock off the juvenile delinquent "clown" name calling. You are a dim wit who has never done anything but seek crowd approval
I'd call you better names, but then I'd be banned like you. You are a silly clown: the name fits, wear it..