Notice: All forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at

2013 v. 2014, Ellsbury v. Bradley

  1. This post has been removed.

  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Joebreidey. Show Joebreidey's posts

    Re: 2013 v. 2014, Ellsbury v. Bradley

    In response to chetgnat's comment:

    some people have no vision. they probably opposed the 2012 house cleaning as well, because they aren't able to accept short-term losses for longer-term success. just can't do it. not capable. incapable. uncapable. not able. unable. can't do. just whine. waaaahhh... ellsbury... waaahhh....  LOL. just s.t.frackup.

    [object HTMLDivElement]

    It made no sense to re-sign Ellsbury in the off-season.  With 3 months in the books, it would've made even less sense.  You never try to outbid the NYY for a player, especially when you have a good substitute.

    An absolute no-brainer.