Re: A Better Understanding of Value: Depreciation
posted at 12/22/2012 2:52 PM EST
In response to Softlaw1's comment:
Bogaerts is in the "bottom" of the top 100 in BA at #58
Bogaerts is not "in the bottom". The bottom is in the 80 and 90's and good ole #100
Ellsbury is not in bottom 100
Ellsbury's draft compensation is not in the bottom 100
Anyone catatonically engaging in a narrative that the garbage traded for Dumspter is at or near the same level as Ellsbury and draft compensation and Bogaerts couldn't beat the resident corpseman at a game of checkers.
Repeat your offer for Anderson, stooge.
Ellsbury's draft compensation will be a sandwich pick between the first and second rounds. You figure that to be top 80 in BA's top prospect list?
Then, by that definition many of our prospects are not "farm scraps":
24 Marrero (#24 is better than a sandwich pick)
31 Brian Johnson (sand pick)
37 Pat Light (sand pick)
26 Swihart (sand)
36 Owens (sand)
40 Bradley (sand)
I feel so better now that the great and powerful softy has projected 7 of our prospects to be top 80 in BA.
I told you not to answer, or you might hurt yourself. You should have listened to sound advice.