A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from .....BABE...... Show .....BABE.....'s posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    How do you guys blame salty for dice k's horrible outing last night but when dice k got bombed in cleveland it wasn't tek's fault?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    The sarcasm also was brimming as well.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Sox are snake bit tonight.
    Now they have to look forward to facing Price. I do hope all available RH bats will be utilized.            
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Tito/Theo won't pigeon-hole Beckett. Not for long. He/they didn't learn their '09 lesson. And the same mentality that went with VMART as a full-time receiver in 2010 has put Salty in the same position for 2011.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    bump
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from BaseballGM. Show BaseballGM's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Is Cash working at a fast food joint? He was very bad.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    All that really matters to me is games behind the Yanks and how many games are left to play.

    It's not as bad as it looks. (4 games back with 155 to go)
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Undecided
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from dannycater. Show dannycater's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

     my apologies, moon, my comment should have said surefire 100-win team, WS champion is a crapshoot once playoffs begin. Which was predicted by way too many bandwagon publications and media type.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Boomerangsdotcom. Show Boomerangsdotcom's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Moon, Harness and the rest of you, we should all join this exclusive option as it enables us to archive our work and enhance our postings a little. I'm even thinking of maybe pointing a domain name to it so we can go right there quickly. We can have individual blogs there. There are lots of reasons why not to do a sports blog that way but at least it's easy and we are here anyway! We can maybe use what we create in some manner in the future.  

    I think they are thinking of this as a value added forum with a little more personal identity. Think of it as maybe 20% facebook, 80 % Boston.com forum. Very crude analogy but we can enhance our stuff a little better with the power they appear to be developing, and maybe it's just a start. FYI.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Disagree; he's still an innings eater. Also, Harness, he could pitch the 6th and 7th when Dice-K pitches his 5.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    That was one game, and that game was over at that point. If Wakefield is as effective as he was last yr, that would be good enough for a long man role. Not everybody can be Koufax.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BaseballGM. Show BaseballGM's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Wakefield is a burden on the active roster. One pitch is an unnecessary burden on the bullpen.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Problem is: NIBBLER form means 5 IP - 100 pitches, and an unnecessary burden on the BP.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BaseballGM. Show BaseballGM's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Wally could be an innings eater. The last outing, after DiceK's meltdown, Wakefield threw softball batting practice. "Innings eater" means nothing. It's "quality innings" that count.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    According to Peter Gammons, he's got 4 more starts to straighten out. Considering the nibbler he's been, that game was shocking from a pitch location/selection POV.
    He needs to revert to nibbler form, which is what he was when he went 18-3. RSN will just have to get over his high Pitch counts per IP in this mode (About 20).
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from BaseballGM. Show BaseballGM's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Take a look at Wakefield's numbers from 2010. He needs to go, but clings like a teflon Don.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    It's unfortunate what measures BDC has taken to deter bumping issues.
    This forum has no history now. Just two pages.
    Two lousy pages...it's like a cyberspace lobotomy.
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    We'll see who does better and maybe will end up with Wally before the season's over.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    In Response to Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II:
    We'll see who does better and maybe will end up with Wally before the season's over.
    Posted by moonslav59



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMk208Op1Jc
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from fenwayjack2. Show fenwayjack2's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    In Response to A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II:
        The season is finally here. The long winter is over and the roster and rotation is set for now. No major surprises this spring. Let's keep this thread troll free, softy free, and abusrd free. Use the game threads to discuss play by play action, and let's make this a thread about season issues, theory, philosophy, and direction.     Softy has pledged to stay away, so that alone makes this a much less hostile place for rational debate and ideas.      I'm sure a few topics will come up again:        1) Line-up debates        2) 5th starter/bullpen issues         3) Tito's decisions        4) Baserunning and Catcher throwing        5) Fielding and sub rotations/platoons        6) Later, trade talks     Let's keep it "real". Let's keep it clean. Let's keep it all about the Sox and Sox-related issues.     Let the games begin. Let the rings be ours!    
    Posted by moonslav59


    You must really regret posting that.  Lol.  Like last year this team will again miss the playoffs. 
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    My guess is nobody else we bring up will do much better than Wake, except Aceves.
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from BaseballGM. Show BaseballGM's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Your guess will be that everyone but Aceves will be teriible then, because Wakefield isn't going to be "better" than anyone unless they, too, are horrible.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from harness. Show harness's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Aceves can implode as well. Big difference between pitching a few mop-up BP innings as compared to starting.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: A Realistic Look at 2011: Part II

    Your guess will be that everyone but Aceves will be teriible then, because Wakefield isn't going to be "better" than anyone unless they, too, are horrible.

    Wake's already been better than lackey, Dice-K and Albers.

    Some are more horrible than others...
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share