Re: A total rebuild was the better long-term option
posted at 12/16/2012 4:58 PM EST
In response to Joebreidey's comment:
Softy's big mistake is wanting to assign blame to Ben C. for everything including the Babe Ruth deal. As usual, he marginalizes everything he says with his extreme positions.
It's the sign of a lack of discipline. A first-rate mind clearly denlineates between what works, and what doesn't. And assigns blame accordingly. You can see that in a lot of the posters. It is impossible for them to say Theo, or Ben, or Tito, or BV, did these three things wrong, and these four things right. With many of them, they have so little confidence in themselves, they simply say 'everything so-and-so did was wrong'.
Exactly Joe! A sign of a very weak mind!!! A mind only capable of looking at one side of a debate, whether it be MLB, RS, or socio-political. These weak sisters can only see the facts that back up their bias. They simply ignore or, more likely can't even process facts that conflict with their own preconceptions. VERY WEAK MINDS!!!!
Take the shooting in Conn. I am a VERY fiscally conservative & socially moderate Republican. This BLOWS softy's little pee brain. I am also PRO-2nd Amendment!!!!!!
BUT!!!! Who, IN GOD'S NAME, needs an assault style automatic or semi-automatic rifle?
Handguns to protect oneself? Absolutely!!!
Hunting rifles? Buy as many as you want!!!!!!
The 2nd Amendment was passed to protect us from our own tyrannical government? YES!
There should be ZERO LIMITS ON THIS 2nd Amendment? Are you FFFF'n kidding me?
*** One would clearly need tanks, F-16's, & perhaps Nuclear weapons to do so, ipso facto this is an absurd line of reason. An assault weapon would not protect anybody if our government were to become tyrannical again. Anybody got a nuclear sub???? We will need one off the Cape, you moron Softy!
So...... We already have limits on the 2nd Amendment, for the SANE who already know this. Softy is already lost in the complexity of this argument.
SO WHO IN GOD'S NAME NEEDS AN ASSAULT WEAPON?
Expand concealed carry????? YES! ( there I go.... lost a bunch more mindless ideologues with the soft one) In schools? YES! Now I'm really blowing his freaking mind with the possible contradiction!!!!!
How many violent crimes are committed by legal concealed carry citizens each year????? NOT MANY YOU FLAMING IGNORAMOUS soft one! But wait. Softy agrees with this part, so what does he do??????
VERY RIGOROUS SCREENING!!!!!
The last bastion of the pathetically ignorant IDEOLOGUE! DEMAGOGUERY!!!!